|
Originally Posted by zook
Originally Posted by will641
you say its not as damning as it sounds, yet you say its not "twisting". just then what do you call it? fwiw, i never said twisted. my point is that a statistic by itself isnt very useful, and the whole goal of obama hammering this point is to make ppl think mccain=bush, and that is misleading, which is basically a politicians job. so no harm no foul.
Oops, not sure where the hell I got "twisting", sorry. I would call it statistic selection. Yeah, I guess I was arguing more with Neil than with you.
I think it's blatantly obvious that a McCain administration would be a hell of a lot more like a Bush administration than an Obama one would. I mean, McCain's a military hawk, he supports making the Bush tax cuts permanent, he has a huge number of Bush people on his staff... given all of that I think it's completely fair for Obama to use Bush's record against McCain.
idk, its just like, if you look at some of the things listed in my first post, those are some pretty big differences between mccain and bush. its not just a bunch of petty bullshit that congress votes for all the time. mccain opposed using torture for one. and of course his administration is going to be similar, he is a republican. the fact of the matter is that he would've used this tactic regardless of which gop member was nominated. not saying its a bad tactic, its good, he has 30% approval rate, which is still about 3x better than congress (ty very much ms. pelosi).
|