|
AKs UTG vs passive SB
Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $0.05 BB (7 handed) - Full Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
BB ($2.70)
Hero (UTG) ($5.05)
MP1 ($5)
MP2 ($5.05)
CO ($4)
Button ($6.72)
SB ($4.95)
Preflop: Hero is UTG with K, A
Hero bets $0.15, 4 folds, SB calls $0.13, BB calls $0.10
Flop: ($0.45) 6, 9, A (3 players)
SB bets $0.45, BB calls $0.45, Hero raises to $1.50, SB raises to $4.80 (All-In), 1 fold, Hero folds
Total pot: $3.90 | Rake: $0.26
Opponent is very passive, 18/2, but this is only over 36 hands. Donk bet on flop suggests strength. Hands that he would flat pre that beat me are A6s, A9s, 99, 66 though he is passive so there is maybe an argument to include AA in his range. He suddenly got very happy to stack off which is why I folded, this could have been with AK, AQ, AJ, AT but I reckon these would c/f rather than shove to a re-raise. The question is then was this a bad re-raise on the flop?
The answer must certainly depend on the mediocre to monster ratio of his range on the flop, the shove suggests that I walked into the monster part. So then the question is would he make a pot size bet with his Ax hands on the flop?
I am fairly sure making the fold after the shove was the best move. Would you have called or flatted? As far as acting after the initial flop raise folding was not an option I considered as I could still have the best hand and I did not want to go three way to the turn and let people draw so I resolved to raise. I am just scratching my head trying to figure out if this bet was +EV or -EV. Maybe I am being too results oriented.
I would like to think he is a competent player and would not shove an Ax hand but you never know... ahhh the frustration of the micros...
Thanks in advance!
|