With top pair weak kicker? That would be balls.Originally Posted by ttanaka
02-07-2004 01:24 AM
#76
| |
| |
02-07-2004 01:24 AM
#77
| |
| |
02-07-2004 01:24 AM
#78
| |
| |
02-07-2004 06:42 PM
#79
| |
|
Ah, thank you very much man! I will read the group 5 recommendations right away :P |
02-07-2004 06:42 PM
#80
| |
|
Ah, thank you very much man! I will read the group 5 recommendations right away :P |
02-07-2004 06:42 PM
#81
| |
|
Ah, thank you very much man! I will read the group 5 recommendations right away :P |
02-07-2004 06:42 PM
#82
| |
|
Ah, thank you very much man! I will read the group 5 recommendations right away :P |
02-07-2004 06:42 PM
#83
| |
|
Ah, thank you very much man! I will read the group 5 recommendations right away :P |
02-07-2004 06:42 PM
#84
| |
|
Ah, thank you very much man! I will read the group 5 recommendations right away :P |
02-10-2004 04:03 PM
#85
| |
Re: your section on group 5 hands and domination. Caro disagrees. | |
02-10-2004 04:03 PM
#86
| |
Re: your section on group 5 hands and domination. Caro disagrees. | |
02-10-2004 04:03 PM
#87
| |
Re: your section on group 5 hands and domination. Caro disagrees. | |
02-10-2004 04:03 PM
#88
| |
Re: your section on group 5 hands and domination. Caro disagrees. | |
02-10-2004 04:03 PM
#89
| |
Re: your section on group 5 hands and domination. Caro disagrees. | |
02-10-2004 04:03 PM
#90
| |
Re: your section on group 5 hands and domination. Caro disagrees. | |
02-10-2004 04:31 PM
#91
| |
I listened to the Caro discussion, I didn't hear any disagreement between his commentary and the Group 5 essay. He mentions that domination is not that profound a subject, and that is true, big cards are better than low cards... bottom line, simple enough. He mentions to play profitable hands (regardless of fear of domination), like KJ, which I do and recommend (1st hand in my Group 5). | |
02-10-2004 04:31 PM
#92
| |
I listened to the Caro discussion, I didn't hear any disagreement between his commentary and the Group 5 essay. He mentions that domination is not that profound a subject, and that is true, big cards are better than low cards... bottom line, simple enough. He mentions to play profitable hands (regardless of fear of domination), like KJ, which I do and recommend (1st hand in my Group 5). | |
02-10-2004 04:31 PM
#93
| |
I listened to the Caro discussion, I didn't hear any disagreement between his commentary and the Group 5 essay. He mentions that domination is not that profound a subject, and that is true, big cards are better than low cards... bottom line, simple enough. He mentions to play profitable hands (regardless of fear of domination), like KJ, which I do and recommend (1st hand in my Group 5). | |
02-10-2004 04:31 PM
#94
| |
I listened to the Caro discussion, I didn't hear any disagreement between his commentary and the Group 5 essay. He mentions that domination is not that profound a subject, and that is true, big cards are better than low cards... bottom line, simple enough. He mentions to play profitable hands (regardless of fear of domination), like KJ, which I do and recommend (1st hand in my Group 5). | |
02-10-2004 04:31 PM
#95
| |
I listened to the Caro discussion, I didn't hear any disagreement between his commentary and the Group 5 essay. He mentions that domination is not that profound a subject, and that is true, big cards are better than low cards... bottom line, simple enough. He mentions to play profitable hands (regardless of fear of domination), like KJ, which I do and recommend (1st hand in my Group 5). | |
02-10-2004 04:31 PM
#96
| |
I listened to the Caro discussion, I didn't hear any disagreement between his commentary and the Group 5 essay. He mentions that domination is not that profound a subject, and that is true, big cards are better than low cards... bottom line, simple enough. He mentions to play profitable hands (regardless of fear of domination), like KJ, which I do and recommend (1st hand in my Group 5). | |