Table is loose passive.
My opening range from MP looks something like
55+, A8s+, KTs+, QTs+, JTs+, T9s+, ATo+, KJo+, QJo+
This is 14.8%, 196 combos
Stacks:
UTG ImSavy ($2) 100bb
CO Player3 ($4.68) 234bb
BTN Player4 (
$0.22) 11bb
SB Player5 (
$2.69) 135bb
BB Player6 (
$4.57) 229bb
Pre-Flop: (
$0.03, 5 players)
ImSavy is UTG
ImSavy raises to $0.06, Player3 calls $0.06,
3 folds
Standard raise size is 3bb, on a table like this I think I should maybe up this to 4bb as my range in spots like this is going to be value heavy.
Villain is 43/5/4.8 (42 hands), positionally unaware and has called 3/3cbets.
SPR = 12.93
Flop: (
$0.15, 2 players)
ImSavy ?
As villain is loose passive and is calling a very high % of cbets and not attacking our checking range, I think my cbet range should be heavily weighted towards value whilst checking all my weaker hands. There is nothing to suggest he will attempt to exploit this strategy.
As our SPR = 13 this would allow us 3 pot sized bets.
After blockers on the flop we have a possible 186c (15.82% possible hands)
Value betting all Ad9d+ (5), AdJ+ (9), A8s (3), 55+ (51), T9s (4), JdTd (1), KdTd+ (3), AK (12), QdTd+ (2)
This is 90/186 which is just over 48% which I think I should be betting the pot with.
This leaves me checking a lot of overcards which still have value if they hit the turn/river.