Couple weird things I have noticed:
right now PS has 1 table of $1/2 9 handed and 5 of $2/4?
Almost everyone at the 9 tables at either amount seems to buy in much shorter? There are some shorties at 6 max but not nearly as high a %?
08-20-2008 05:31 PM
#1
| |
6 vs 9 maxCouple weird things I have noticed: | |
08-20-2008 05:38 PM
#2
| |
I think at FR you can get a lot more of your stack in PF if there is an open and more callers PF. | |
08-20-2008 05:50 PM
#3
| |
interesting, I had not thought of pot size with limpers, good call. | |
08-21-2008 08:04 AM
#4
| |
slotbloom? or someone ahs an article/book on this. | |
08-21-2008 08:30 AM
#5
| |
|
you're thinking of Rolf Slotboom. Just posting it if anyone wants to search... Don't know if he wrote about this specifically, but he sure has a couple of books about Omaha, so it might be him. |
08-21-2008 04:12 PM
#6
| |
I was gonna use 2000FPPs to get his book from Stars, then I read the reviews on it and they were mostly mehhhhhhh. The book goes into detail about short-stacking a building stacks, which could be useful I think at like 5/10 and up, but like Miff said anyone with a club can buy-in full and beat the small-mid stakes games. | |
08-21-2008 04:24 PM
#7
| |
i just got it from FPP store today, I already have ciaffone, hwang and reuben so I figured may as well. I can't ever see short stacking but may as well learn how they are trying to play. It's a thick book anyway. | |
08-21-2008 06:29 PM
#8
| |
When I played at AP I would buy-in ~75bb and stay after I doubled, but there were a lot of players that would buy-in 150-200bb so I'd be playing with mostly their money. | |
| |
08-23-2008 09:59 PM
#9
| |
| |