|
Originally Posted by hangchiong
Scenario: 100bb effective stacks. You have 22 UTG and open for a standard raise. A normal TAGG on the button calls, everyone else folds. You should cbet these flops...
A K 4 rainbow
[ ] Never
[ ] Sometimes
[X] Always
J T 8 2- suited
[ X] Never (almost never)
[X] Sometimes
[ ] Always
A T 8 2- suited
[ ] Never
[ X] Sometimes
[X] Always
Avoid cbetting this against someone who's like 20/12 - the gap between VP$P and PFR indicates he calls with premium sc's and/or suited broadways.
6 5 4 rainbow
[ ] Never
[X] Sometimes
[ ] Always
A 9 8 monotone
[ ] Never
[ X] Sometimes
[X] Always
C-betting-to show that we have big pocket pairs or an Ace with a good kicker.i cbet my flop 90% of the time,im starting to cut it down,as you can the friggin red line is really bad( villain check raise me here a lot or flatcalls,and fire turn-i fold)
Yes,i raised my small pp to high pp in all position 90% of the time.Sometimes i limp to mix up my play or according to my mood or the players at my table.
Correct reasoning on what you're representing. Watch out for what they tend to call with. The TAGG's like 18/15 are only calling with small/med pp's. When the gap increases to 20/14 or so, think what they're probably adding into their flatting range. Ax(s) gets more likely along with big sc's and broadway hands. For both types of TAGG's, check 3betting. When it's >6, they might be 3betting 99 and are almost certainly w/ TT+. AQ+, KQs and A9s+ are good candidates, too. If you get flatted, you can eliminate some premium 3betting hands.
At 6m, I find it unprofitable to limp any pp's. I get 3bet, I fold, but even at 25nl it doesn't happen often enough to worry me. And they min-3bet enough that, with 100bb stacks, we can often call the min-3bets profitably. I can't imagine (m)any tables where I'd consider limping small pp's except in extremely weird situations. The big exception is the SB with a passive BB - just limping is fine, especially w/ 22 - 44.
|