dammit you guys, I had to buy out of the bet
I'd rather have sex with girl 1 but look like girl 2
|
09-06-2012 02:22 AM
#1
| |
dammit you guys, I had to buy out of the bet | |
|
| |
|
09-06-2012 02:27 AM
#2
| |
![]()
|
So what's going on here? Because the answers here don't necessarily correlate with that idea |
|
09-06-2012 03:06 AM
#3
| |
|
09-06-2012 03:22 AM
#4
| |
![]()
|
I think there are some interesting visual tricks going on here. There is a lot about #1 framing that looks sexier despite the potential that #2 girl might be prettier (or even hotter altogether) |
|
09-06-2012 03:47 AM
#5
| |
|
#1 for none specific reasons . . . . . |
|
09-06-2012 04:44 AM
#6
| |
Before reading any of the responses -- I have an immediate attraction to girl 1, and she does look less "made-up" than the second girl, which is a big plus. However, asking myself the question which would I rather make out with, 2 wins by a not insignificant margin. | |
|
| |
|
09-06-2012 04:47 AM
#7
| |
re Wuf's post going through the merits of the pictures and shit, that is pretty much true but I like to think that when asked to judge which one is "prettier" or "sexier", then most people build up a three-dimensional image of said women in their mind anyway, so that the angle in the picture becomes less important. The problem is how much the pictures actually reveal in terms of how good that image in our minds is. Does that make sense to anyone? | |
|
| |