Hmmmmmm

[Toadstool]

Is this correct or significant?

[griffey24]

I'm not sure if its significant.. but that might be cause I can barely read it!

[Toadstool]

Ah, basically it's just a theory that if you were a superuser then you would never call a bet on the river, so the better you are at hand reading, the less you call the river. (in a vacuum, if you knew your opponents hand, you would never just call the river, unless they went allin and you could only call or fold)

[griffey24]

I suppose in theory thats true. Though since Ivey isn't a superuser I'd imagine the graph should be slowly declining towards Ivey and then a huge spike down at superuser.

The superuser will obviously never need to call river. Ivey doesn't have perfect information, and there are just tons of spots where you could very well have the best hand but realize that no worse hands are calling a raise, so there isn't much value in raising. Or at least the probability of him calling a raise is so low that it outweighs your certainty of being ahead and you just call anyway.

[daven]

Nice observation. Add another line with W$WSD to make it even more interesting?

[aka_red]

i think its pretty interesting and probably significant. should defo not be a straight line tho needs to have a curve in it for sure

[Genitruc]

chuck liddell had me loling for sure, gsp def never calls riv unless it s for head-explosion factor with the nuts