2/4 deep: reverse clairvoyance

Originally Posted by nutsinho

he appears to not have a check/call range vs any reasonably sized bet. why tempt him to reevaluate?

I guess I never thought that a bigger bet makes a fold more likely against experienced players. I just try to make my bets as credible as possible. With TT/JJ I would want to tempt him so that's my bet with this hand as well.

I actually think something like $35 is optimal with TT/JJ so $120 is already clearly exploitative territory.

03-12-2010 07:43 PM #1
pocketfours View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message View Blog Entries Join Date Mar 2007 Posts 2,765 Location Lighting sweet moneys on fire.	Originally Posted by nutsinho he appears to not have a check/call range vs any reasonably sized bet. why tempt him to reevaluate? I guess I never thought that a bigger bet makes a fold more likely against experienced players. I just try to make my bets as credible as possible. With TT/JJ I would want to tempt him so that's my bet with this hand as well. I actually think something like $35 is optimal with TT/JJ so $120 is already clearly exploitative territory.

Reply With Quote

03-16-2010 01:12 PM #2
Silly String View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message View Blog Entries Join Date Jul 2005 Posts 1,914 Location KC, MO	Originally Posted by pocketfours I actually think something like $35 is optimal with TT/JJ so $120 is already clearly exploitative territory. $35 is optimal to induce?? It can't be optimal as a value bet b/c it is too little value for the risk, right?
	Playing live . . . thanks alot Bin Laden.
Reply With Quote

2/4 deep: reverse clairvoyance

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

Hybrid View

Posting Permissions