2/4 - Trip aces - 3bet pot

-UTG in this hand opens fairly wide around 23%
-CO in this hand has a lot 3bet around, 6.5
-BB squeezer in this hand has a squeeze of around 7.5 and a 3b of around 9, though most of his 3bets seem to be vs LP stealers
-is river a gross spot or is this a snap?

$2/$4 No Limit Holdem
5 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

Stacks:
UTG ($527.90) 132bb
CO ($396.80) 99bb
griffey24 (BTN) ($612.10) 153bb
SB ($396) 99bb
BB ($417.90) 104bb

Pre-Flop: ($6, 5 players) griffey24 is BTN
UTG raises to $12, CO calls $12, griffey24 calls $12, 1 fold, BB raises to $50, UTG calls $38, CO folds, griffey24 calls $38

Flop: ($164, 3 players)
BB checks, UTG checks, griffey24 checks

Turn: ($164, 3 players)
BB bets $50, UTG calls $50, griffey24 calls $50

River: ($314, 3 players)
BB bets $317.90, UTG folds, griffey24??

idk I'd just fold without thinking about it too much.

Definitely a very tough spot, I personally would've raised the turn (and maybe even bet on the flop) just because there's a lot of potential draws out there.

BB could easily have the final ace (significant 3 bet preflop). A 1/3 pot bet on the turn seems strange if they had a bare flush draw. I am thinking they have an ace and even if they do, who knows if the kicker is better than yours.

definitely a tough decision, I feel like a fold is the best play at this point

He can't have a flush though, so only AK/KK that slowplayed flop?

Originally Posted by Alexos

He can't have a flush though, so only AK/KK that slowplayed flop?

I don't think it's inconceivable people have a flush here. Suppose they 3b 78ss or something, and they don't want to bet and get shipped on the flop?

It's not a bad spot for a low FD to take a c/c line, when people would perceive a c/c range as having monsters in it here?

A c/c line makes no sense to me, nor does the fear of getting shipped on this flop when I have an 8hi FD! I'd pretty much always cbet 1/3 pot or so.

That said you rep like A9s+, 77, some FDs, so folding is probably correct.

Originally Posted by griffey24

I don't think it's inconceivable people have a flush here. Suppose they 3b 78ss or something, and they don't want to bet and get shipped on the flop?

If I had a flush draw on this scary board I am absolutely checking the flop. Trying to see if I can hit a spade...the villain could definitely have a flush on the river

Alright thanks for the feedback everyone.

The roles were reversed in this hand, and I was actually BB here and trying to see if my river bluff was good, or if LP with any Ax will be snapping.

Seems to be alright by the responses here so far. It was so long ago I don't even remember my hand, but they both folded. BTN folded after tanking a long time.

bb rerasie pf shows that he doesn't have suited cards but does he have a full house or a better ace is the question if you never seen him fold if he is nonaggressive and does't usually rerasie pf fold. If he is a loose caboose flatcall. thats my opinion

what did you end up taking this line with?

BB had fullhouse

Originally Posted by ChipEaterMan

BB had fullhouse

you shoudl read the thread, griffey was actually BB and was bluffing.

Goes to show that the line that doesn't make sense is a bluff, as is often the case. I would fold but I'm tempted to call because it looks fishy, and I more expect this to be for value on microstakes.

I saw a mate use a similar line for value yesterday (after losing a pot) and get a call so I dunno, atleast some people have a value range here.