Raise more PF.
Call Flop. Bad laydown.
Type: Posts; User: Iconoclastic
Raise more PF.
Call Flop. Bad laydown.
Paradise Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.25/$0.50
10 players
Converter
MP1: ($46.10 in chips)
MP2: ($75.15 in chips)
Button: ($65.90 in chips)
Hero: ($74.75 in chips)
Nah dude, it's 10 handed full ring. I just put in the 4 relevant stacks but it's not shorthanded at all.
As you can see this is a pretty tricky situation as the advice thus far has been quite different.
Any more comments before I reveal what happened?
Interesting. Why? And what is your substitute?
Well I'm getting few enough responses as is so I have to make a compromise somewhere between accuracy and sufficient sample size and 25k is reasonable
yea but again, i can't make a separate poll for...
Paradise Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.25/$0.50
10 players
Converter
MP1: ($46.10 in chips)
MP2: ($75.15 in chips)
Button: ($65.90 in chips)
Hero: ($74.75 in chips)
Please, please only vote if you are both 1) and 2):
1) Decisively either a pot-pot-pot bettor (keeps betting standard bet amount until convinced you're beat) or a slow down when encountering...
Is there a chat schedule? Otherwise I don't think there'll ever be enough of a critical mass to make it worthwhile to go there.
25NL to 100NL full ring...you raise preflop and get one caller, he has a 50BB stack and you cover...
...Villain just sat down so you have no reads...
...Board is rags, something like 853...
Somebody should do a Review for the front page
My question is more of a mathematical one than whether you want them to stay in the hand or not. Assuming that one does want them to give them poor odds, do I calculate it from MY point of view,...
So say normally if you have one opponent and you know he has a flush draw, you would bet to deny them implied odds, and you would bet a certain amount. But what if there were two opponents, say one...
It was omitted due to 1) I have seen him raise KK before 2) making it even less likely 3) to balance out a donk factor or a bluff
I was inspired to do a little math after the following hand:
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (9 handed) converter
UTG+1 ($46.60) Reads: raises KK PF and bets half pot with an overpair on...
Fixed it for ya
You raised for info, got reraised twice, and still stuck your stack in there???!!!!???[/quote]
Pokerstove
Board: Ah 4h 7s
equity (%) win (%) tie...
I decided to make a pot committing raise...
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (8 handed) converter
UTG+1 ($7.55)
MP1 ($89.05)
MP2 ($58.15)
CO ($34)
Hero ($49.25)
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (8 handed) converter
UTG+1 ($7.55)
MP1 ($89.05)
MP2 ($58.15)
CO ($34)
Hero ($49.25)
SB ($9.75)
BB ($108.50)
UTG ($33.05)
Against Tight players, this is optimal. Against looser players who will call without odds with two pair or set you should raise to as much as you think they'll call while giving them bad odds. You...
Its a tourney lol[/quote]
Whoops, it's been THAT long since I've played a tournament!
Is the maximum buyin less than 4k? It looks like almost everyone, including Hero, is shortstacked.
Well with the help from you guys and some number crunching in my PT database I've come up with a preliminary approximation for Full Ring:
15-25%. That means if they're below 15% I won't hesitate...
Why stop at 6 max? Heads Up seems to be even better for you.
I'm not sure what the one % means, is that High? Low? I was hoping for something along the lines of: range between X% and Y%, everything lower than X is Tightie and everything above Y is Loose
If you have pokertracker and are familiar with WtSD, what number would be considered "high" and what number would be considered "low"? What's a range for Full Ring?
I would like to use WtSD as...