Search:

It's both.

In my worldview, there are two parts to the profit motive. The first is the short-term in the sense of being able to provide for those needs that you listed earlier (hunger, thirst, shelter, etc.)....

I think the answer to both of those questions can be yes, and I think that it's also fun.

Not talking about anyone in particular in this thread (not even you, OngBonga), but I think it's funny when people act like "corruption" isn't completely natural.

Yeah if the welfare queens don't get their food stamps and weed money, then we're all in for a world of shit.

Capitalism in nature is a fun topic as well

And for any of you fucks who want to continue to shit on capitalism because you don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about:...

I mean if you're calling yourself a welfare queen, then that's your business.

Maybe this discussion should be reserved for people who aren't welfare queens.

On the above two points, I just want to point out that heavy taxation hurts charity in a major way.

Taxation is not voluntary by definition. No amount of trying to bend words will change that.

Excellent argument.



Or not.

Lawsuits Could Turn Chimpanzees Into Legal Persons:
http://news.sciencemag.org/plants-animals/2013/12/lawsuits-could-turn-chimpanzees-legal-persons

itt people who know more about sunshine and rainbows and poems about puppies and red velvet cupcakes than econ