I know, so was I. Case in point.
Type: Posts; User: CoccoBill
I know, so was I. Case in point.
What? That wasn't in reference to anything. At all.
Facial expressions and audible voice are physical phenomena btw so I guess we're on topic.
Yeah absolutely. Missing the visual cues (expressions) is one thing, also missing the auditory ones (tone of voice) just makes it worse. There's emojis to remedy this but they only go so far and are...
X like me, I think it's like '65-'80. I'm '74.
Phone calls are the last resort. The levels of aggression when seeking someone's attention go like this:
1. Email. Please respond when you have the time. Tomorrow or the day after are fine too....
Boomers. I use my phone for everything, except for phone calls. Obviously at home my pc is the primary device, but when on the move. I wouldn't watch a movie on it at home, but I've watched several...
https://twitter.com/MichaelSFuhrer/status/1689446900284764160
After the disappointment this was a nice wrap-up.
Also, this just in
https://twitter.com/Andercot/status/1686286684424691712?s=20
https://eirifu.wordpress.com/2023/07/30/lk-99-superconductor-summary/#sbtable
This (claims to be/)is ambient temperature and normal atmospheric pressure though.
https://twitter.com/Andercot/status/1684339092635496449
https://twitter.com/andrewmccalip/status/1684433849781202944
https://twitter.com/8teAPi/status/1684385895565365248
https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1684314237995286528?s=20
https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/breaking-superconductor-news
I'm sure this is gonna turn out to be a nothingburger...
From what I've gathered reading comments from people with impressive-sounding titles, it seems plausible, VERY interesting and likely a fraud.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12008
Damn ftr not working on mobile browser. Anyway, I was trying to say already hours ago, that the one you're linking at is about different scientists and different methods, paper released a couple days...
How legit does this sound:
https://twitter.com/alexkaplan0/status/1684044616528453633
In other words ong was wrong.
Exactly what I thought. I have no idea what you said.
Moon's mean orbital velocity: 1.022 km/s
GPS satellites move at 3.9 km/s.
Now someone calculate how much of the time dilation disparity is due to gravity and how much due to velocity.
Just checked that for gps satellites the adjustment is 45 microseconds per day. The difference between earth local - earth orbit - moon local doesn't sound intuitive considering gravity on the moon...
Yeah knew about gps satellite time needing to be adjusted, I seem to recall some tens of microseconds per day. Wonder what the difference is on the moon.
It's just a lazy hack in our poorly designed simulation.
Interesting read guys, thanks. Ong, stick to physics, political science isn't your forte. :heart: