Search:

Hmm, did they? How about that SCJ they refused to consider? Seems like a pretty big deal there.





I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say, based on your argument style, that that's probably...

Pretty sure if Obama had starting separating families on a regular basis he would have heard some criticism about it.

Also, this is overall a pretty lame argument. Obama got lambasted all the time...

I think he means there wasn't a refugee crisis during Obama's time. But now zomgcaravans are going to become a permanent occurrence at the border from here to eternity.

You're already admitted there's more cost effective ways to police the border than the Wall. Your main remaining reason for building it are so Trump can fulfill his promise, while simultaneously not...

Good that you added that in there for clarity. Otherwise I mighta wondered what the purpose of a hoax was.

Why do you insist he isn't if it doesn't matter?

You call it a 'coordinated media hoax', but it's really evidence.

Even Captain Retard knows he can't pass blatantly racist legislation. So saying , 'hey he's never changed a law to make it more racist' is kinda irrelevant.

Projecting again. It is YOU who wants him to be NOT racist. I actually would prefer he's not racist too; but I have the evidence before my eyes.

btw, all of Gardner, Grassley and Rubio (all Rs) openly challenged Trump's remarks.

At best what he said was stupidly inappropriate; at worst he was openly pandering to white supremacists.
...

How big a pile of evidence do you want?

I'm not saying everything on this list is blatantly racist, some of it is just stupid. But some of it definitely is.
...

Oh, and who was that guy that got sued in NY for being unwilling to rent to black people? Some non-racist I'm sure....

Wasn't that quote you referred to there Trump's second try at acting presidential. What did he say the first time again? I forget.

lol you're the master of cognitive dissonance. As soon as you start to lose an argument you either start hurling insults or change the subject.

So you're mad they reacted to this, but it makes sense that calling Christians "Easter Worshippers" is some kind of code for "non-victims".

Also, you're right Trump isn't racist. He just says...

Sure whatever.

I mean if they're really trying to promote such a narrative, why be so subtle about it that only paranoids will notice?

Why not just come out and say 'this attack on some people somewhere is bad,...

Ya i get the argument, I was just using shorthand rather than typing all that out.

And it's not 'everyone in the DNC' either, is it?

Someone noticed a coincidence in phrasing between two...

Jesus, next time read past the headline before you post something.



Like I said, this happens a lot.

Care to rephrase this?

That just went up, you twat. Sorry I'm not permanently linked to Fox News like you are.

Anyways I was talking (obviously) about the paranoid fantasy of people not using the C-word as a way to...

Omfg. There's a counter-conspiracy too!

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-40343485

You mean agree with your paranoid fantasy? No sorry I can't.

Even the Catholics have been in on it. Look, they used the word 'parishioners' in the title rather than 'Catholic parisioners'
...

Jesus, it started a long time ago. Why didn't anybody notice it then?

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/896191/christmas-terror-attack-police-warning-terrorism-security-check-churches-midnight-mass