If I "won" Quebec in a raffle, it'd be on eBay next day with an opening bid of 99p.
Printable View
If I "won" Quebec in a raffle, it'd be on eBay next day with an opening bid of 99p.
C'est folles.
Montreal has some of the sexiest women in the world. Fact.
I didn't know Montreal was in Japan.
Japanese porn has ruined japanese women for me.
The key is to watch lesbian Japanese porn.
I know what you mean though. I can't say I find it a turn on when they have "please don't touch me there" body language. I don't know if it's a cultural thing or if it's just something they do in porn because they think it's what people want to see, but it can feel a bit rapey.
It's for this reason I stick with solo and lesbian porn when it comes to Japan. Or cosplay. God fucking damn Japanese cosplay.
Japanese porn is like watching something from another planet.
Wtf is with the squeaky moaning the women do? It's like listening to a mouse get laid.
Wtf is with the pixellated genitals? You can watch all kinds of gore in Japan but god forbid you see what a vagina really looks like instead of it looking like hamburger.
Wtf is with all the incest? At least pretend it's a step-relation if you want to go that way. It's just fucking creepy watching a movie where some guy is supposed to be boning his own daughter.
And yeah, that's not an overall sexy race of women, sorry. No hips, usually no tits. All have the same hair and rarely are they very pretty. I'll take an Indian or Latina or white woman over a Japanese one pretty much every day. I only watch Jap porn when I get bored with proper porn.
I do have to admit though the Japanese have a much more creative approach to porn movie plots than we do. One thing I remember seeing was some race where there were five or six women on gocarts that had automated dildos fucking them while they raced around the track. Then they'd go in for a pit stop and get a crew working on them, oiling them up, and one guy would fuck them while they polished the go cart. Lmfao that was funny.
On another note, when someone says shit like this guy about wanting to throw someone off a bulding they should take him straight for an MRI of his brain. I bet 9/10 times they'd find a hole in his frontal lobes. Then they could say 'yeah sorry mate you got brain damage we can't let you wander around free'.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-513898...channel=social
Yep.Quote:
Japanese porn is like watching something from another planet.
I don't really have a problem with squeaky moaning. It's better than tennis grunts, and much more preferable to men moaning. Men in porn should be completely silent.Quote:
Wtf is with the squeaky moaning the women do? It's like listening to a mouse get laid.
If you're up to it, google > tubgirl. Warning, NSFW and very fucking gross. It's funny though, very funny. Basically, there's a woman in a bath tub with a stream of projectile diarrhea arcing from her arse to her mouth, but her vagina is pixellated to preserve her dignity. Classy touch.Quote:
Wtf is with the pixellated genitals? You can watch all kinds of gore in Japan but god forbid you see what a vagina really looks like instead of it looking like hamburger.
Not all Japanese porn is pixellated though.
This isn't the kind of Japanese porn I find.Quote:
Wtf is with all the incest? At least pretend it's a step-relation if you want to go that way. It's just fucking creepy watching a movie where some guy is supposed to be boning his own daughter.
The problem with Indians, Latina and white women is they too often shave their pussies. The Japanese usually have nice hairy bushes. That's a big plus. Also, them fucking eyes. It's not just the Japanese I like, it's all of them... Chinese, Thai, Korean, Vietnamese, all the slitty eyed girls are beautiful. It's a personal preference I guess, I've always had slightly strange taste in women.Quote:
I'll take an Indian or Latina or white woman over a Japanese one pretty much every day. I only watch Jap porn when I get bored with proper porn.
https://cdn2.stylecraze.com/wp-conte...-Yamashita.jpg
This bitch is a clear ten.
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/a3/00/5f/a...5156a89a60.jpg
Latina bitch - 9.5
https://cdn.cltampa.com/files/base/s..._pictures5.jpg
Kari from Mythbusters - 11
https://scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.net...c6&oe=5ED30A93
Ju Wenjun - 11
https://kyliesarse.files.wordpress.c...igue_30041.jpg
Kylie's arse - 10
Tell me you've googled tubgirl. It will amuse me to know I've inflicted that on someone.
When I was your age we used to play UT maps where every texture was tubgirl, and it made us stronger!
prn for ong
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ahrn-141vdA
^ They forgot to pixellate the tentacles.
I just surprised myself. Challenged to name ten people from the 15th century, I got six out of ten, with one answer being just two years out, and none being more than a century out.
Anyone fancy a go at beating me?
Here are my answers...
Spoiler:Henry VII - born 1457
Henry VIII -born 1491
Catherine of Aragon-born 1485
Anne Boleyn - born 1501 -FAIL
Walter Raleigh - born 1552 - FAIL
Galileo -born 1564 -FAIL
Christopher Columbus - born 1451
Richard III -born 1452
William Tell -legend dates back from 1307 -FAIL
Henry VI - born 1421
1400s, that's old. Most of these are guesses.
Spoiler:
Chris Columbus
Ponce de Leon (1500s?)
Charles of Spain
Charles's wife Isabella
Mehmed the Ottoman Guy
Oliver Cromwell
Guy Fawkes (1500s?)
William the Conqueror
Mary Queen of Scots (1500s?)
Robin Hood
Ivan the Terrible
Pope Pius and the other pope at Avignon guy
Edit:
Columbus - easy win
Ponce was born 1480s -win
It was Ferdinand and Isabella who financed Columbus, Charles became King in 1516 -1 for 2
Mehmet -born 1432 - win
Cromwell- b 1599 - way off
Fawkes - b 1570 - way off
Wiiliam the Conq. -11th century - lolbad
Mary - b 1542
Robin Hood - first mention in 1300s
Ivan - b. 1530
Avignon happened in 1300s. there probably was a pope pius in 1400s but not the guy i was thinking of
So I got 4. In my defense, my country has no history from this time period.
First two are good.
Third answer is out by a single year, and his wife was younger.
Fifth answer is way too ambiguous.
Sixth born 1599, just within a century.
Seventh was indeed 1500s
William the Conqueror is a really bad answer, he conquered England in 1066, a very famous date.
Ninth answer is 1500s, not bad.
Tenth is 13th/14th century according to wikipedia.
Eleventh born 1530
And the popes... There's a lot of Pope Pius', and the other one I can't figure out who you're referring to but it seems to be between the period from 1309 to 1376.
You did as well as I expected to. Half decent effort but no cigar.
I was somewhat lucky if I'm honest. My history is poor, but there's one battle I remembered well and it led me to five correct answers.
Nah, I knew who i meant. There's only one of them who's really well-known.Quote:
Fifth answer is way too ambiguous.
There was a thing where there was a kerfuffle in the Church and the French (I think) decided to have their own pope. That pope sat at Avignon. About all I know about it.Quote:
And the popes... There's a lot of Pope Pius', and the other one I can't figure out who you're referring to but it seems to be between the period from 1309 to 1376.
I have no idea who he is, but there's a lot of people who it could be from my ignorant pov. You'll have to check if you're right on that one.Quote:
Nah, I knew who i meant. There's only one of them who's really well-known.
Mehmet II. He's the one who took Istanbul from the Byzantines, which pretty much set off the Ottoman Empire. There was one Mehmet before him and a bunch after, but he was the one who's famous.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mehmed_the_Conqueror
That's a good answer then.
This is a question about the past, isn't it?
lol
I'm terrible with names and dates. I hated most history classes because the things I remember from any historical story are inevitably not the questions historians are interested in, mostly names and dates.
C'mon... just ask me the order of things, instead of pinning them to a timeline. I can tell you what happened 1st, 2nd, etc. most of the time.
How did none of you get Jeanne d'Arc?
... or Christopher Columbus. That should have been the most obvious.
Shame you didn't mock my Mom's age yesterday, it was her birthday yesterday.
Nope. They existed.Quote:
Kings are cheating btw.
Me and poop both got him.Quote:
...or Christopher Columbus.
I got lucky with the century, because I can only remember the dates of two battles... Hastings and Bosworth. The Battle of Bosworth was 1485, was won by Henry VII, and lost by Richard III. Henry VII was Henry VIII's father, and then there's the wives, of which I got one. And of course Henry VI was a complete guess. Five answers from one battle.
Columbus was my only other correct answer.
Walter Raleigh was a dumb answer of mine. I knew he was around during the Spanish Armada, and I knew that was the 16th century. But at least it's not as bad as poop's William the Conqueror answer, who won the Battle of Hastings, the most famous event in England's distant history.
What the hell was the Battle of Bosworth? Never even heard of it.
I think I was thinking William of Orange or some other William. Can't keep them straight. Really if it was a French king his name should have been Guillaime the Conqueror. Fucking historians messing my history knowledge up.
Joan of Arc was a good one too. Should have got her.
So if this game were played in 2500 and they were asking about the 20th century, who would get named? Here's my picks.
Hitler ldo.
JFK
MLK
Einstein
Stephen Hawking
Bill Gates
Fleming - Penicillin guy
Neil Armstrong
Winston Churchill
That Dyson vacuum guy
(Edit: haha, not serious about the vac guy. Freud I'mma go with, just for Oskar ... oh wait, Hitler was for Oskar - damn Austria's produced some fucked up dudes)
William the Conqueror was a Norman, and they were Vikings who invaded Normandy. William of Orange was born in 1650, but I didn't know that so I won't mock you for that one.
The Battle of Bosworth is famous because it's the last time the English throne changed hands as a result of battle. It was the most significant battle of the Wars of the Roses. Probably the second most famous battle in English history. I'll forgive you for not knowing this, seeing as I assume you were schooled in Canada.
Oh and wait I'm replacing Fleming in my list (mainly because I can't remember his first name) with Franz Ferdinand, or maybe Kaiser Bill.
Probably no-one will care about Bill Gates then either now I think of it. Imma replace him with Lenin.
Alexander Flemming. Father of modern antibiotics. Dude saved bazillions of lives. It came up in a recent conversation I had with a biologist. Not the kind of thing I'd remember.
These 2, though... I've committed to memory because they are probably among the most important people to make healthy, plentiful food available to damn near everyone in the world.
Norman Borlaug is probably the most influential person you haven't heard of from the 20th century. He did more to increase food production and quality in the last 100 years than anyone else I know of. His crops are probably the most relevant factor to reduction of famine and hunger on the largest scales in all human history.
He's right up there with Patrick Bell who invented the precursor to the combine harvester, but that was late 19th century.
I'd like to think my name will come up in future conversations about the 20th century.
The ones that I'd imagine will still be remembered are...
Hitler,
Churchill,
Einstein,
Hawking,
Lennon,
McCartney,
Mother Theresa,
Queen Elizabeth,
Fleming
JFK
What's Queen Elizabeth done that history will remember - aside from not die for a really long time?
She's probably the most famous woman alive today. Note that in my list from the 15th century, I had four kings. Ok I'm British, so our history it's more relevant to me, but she's the dominant monarch of the century, not just in England but across the world, and the only one people will remember. She might be the last queen here for a very long time, possibly ever.
Maybe people won't remember when she was alive, because you're right, it's not like she's done anything important. It depends really if the last century will be be remembered as a significant one, which is quite possible considering there were two world wars, and it was when we became technologically advanced. Nuclear weapons, electricity, General Relativity, computers, aeroplanes, so many important events that history will remember. I can see the 20th century being well studied in the future.
Yeah don't think QEII is being remembered 500 years from now. She's the dominant monarch is kinda just being dominant at being irrelevant. Not sure how memorable that will be.
I thought about Lennon and McCartney myself, and I think if Mozart is still being celebrated now, they could still be celebrated in 2500 AD. That said, its hard to know with art what will live on and what won't. Certainly they're the most famous musicians of the last 100 years.
Mozart is 18th Century.
QEII will be remembered, but perhaps not well enough to accurately date. People struggle to date Henry VIII, the only reason I have any idea of his time is because I know his father won a battle which I can date. So you're probably right.
Replace her with Thatcher then.
This isn't a popularity contest. Thatcher will certainly be remembered. So will Mao Zedong though, to be fair.
Actually fuck them both.
Richard D James, aka Aphex Twin. I can see his music living long after he's gone.
Thatcher brought massive economic changes to the UK. It's obviously impossible to tell if her policies will be considered significant in the future, but they're certainly still relevant today. If 20th century economics are studied in the future, then her name will be mentioned. She's more memorable than Reagan.
Nixon would probably be more memorable, in fairness, just because of Watergate. Trump might be too, and he counts as 20th century even though his term is 21st century.
I didn't give a list of ten British people, so this is an unnecessary swipe.Quote:
the world btw extends outside the UK
I don't think Brian Adams or Celine Dion will be remembered, it has to be said. Or even Justin Beiber.
Is there anyone else famous from Canada?
Matt Stone and Trey Parker. Legends.
Alanis Morissette... I quite liked her tbh.
Avril Latrine.
Paul Peschisolido.
Um...
A few wrestlers I remember when I was a kid were Canadian... , Roddy Piper, Bret Hart and Earthquake.
I've heard of the De Guzman brothers, both footballers.
And then of course there's Greg Rusedski, the tennis player who was British when he won, Canadian when he lost.
There must be lots of musicians I've heard of, can't be bothered to browse the list though.
I had a Canadian teacher at school who claimed to have been in the Highlander movies. Can't remember his name though.
poop can't count.
The problem with you poop is you're petty and argue about stupid shit.
Exactly the same problem as I have.
Nah.
Poopy's just looking for you to say dumb things, so everything you say seems dumb to him.
My problem is I like arguing about stupid shit. I really don't know why, I guess it's a form of entertainment. I enjoy talking shit. Sometimes I say dumb shit, sometimes I say smart shit. If I tried hard enough, I could just say smart shit. But that would be boring.
It would be fucking funny if they voted to remain in the UK a second time.
How?
What does British mean if living on the island of Great Britian doesn't mean you're British?
Argh. Great Britain, obv.
The term British usually refers to a citizen of the UK, but it can also mean someone from the island of Great Britain, so even if Scotland leave they are still British. Well, except for those on the islands like Skye and Orkney, they can stop being British.
These are abstract cultural, geographical, and political constructs, as I'm sure you know.
So yes, technically, if Scotland separated politically from the UK, they would still be part of the British isles. But they'd not identify as part of "Great Britain" and I suspect the people would stop referring to themselves as "British". Kind of like how Britain is geographically part of Europe but most Brits don't identify as "European."
Or apparently they never did. Same with the Welsh. Seems only the English refer to themselves routinely as British.
http://projectbritain.com/nationality.htm
Great Britain is the name of the island that the vast majority of Scotland occupies. There's no getting away from that. I mean they could call it something else if they really wanted to, but that's just getting petty.
The British Isles is the name of the archipelago, so that includes all of Ireland.
So like I said 5/10. Unlike some people, I respect the right of Fleming to identify himself as Scottish.
Fleming was British whether he liked it or not. Just like I am. If I want to identify as English, I'm still British.
Sure. And I'm "American" because I come from the Americas.
Everyone I've ever met from S. America loves to point out that they're Americans, too.
Mostly just to throw it in U.S. Americans face that the thing we say doesn't mean the thing we think it means to anyone but us, I think.
***
This seems like I just opened up a really boring conversation about words meaning multiple things, and people calling themselves whatever they want.
I regret.
I identify as Scandinavian and think we should leave the EU and join Iceland.
Anyone know where I can get one of these?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nj-Iwv5NJKg
At 2.30 he's like "so long, suckers!"