true, but you would have to be ignorant to not agree that ESPN and ABC are biased toward certain teams... Like Ohio State, USC, OklaQuote:
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Printable View
true, but you would have to be ignorant to not agree that ESPN and ABC are biased toward certain teams... Like Ohio State, USC, OklaQuote:
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
They're not here to be right, they're here to have people watch them.
I think it just shows how pathetic the BCS system is when Penn State could have easily been in the National Championship game if they were not so retarded and lost to Michigan State.
at least get the team right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Bigcity
hint: PSU beat MSU by 31
PSU lost by 1 at Iowa.
lol is this a joke?Quote:
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
Quote:
- On the same note, the big-10 gets screwed so badly on so many different fronts every bowl season. They have the longest downtime since their season ends early, and always travel south/west/southwest. Compunding this is the cold weather making it harder to practice and the rule limiting teams to 15 practices between the regular season and bowl season. And yes, I have tissues in hand.
:whistle:Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukie
Then don't watch. They'll change if people lose interest.
Check out my sticky at the top of this forum!Quote:
Originally Posted by Parasurama
wait so is the Big Ten 1-5 now with the OSU/UT game left?
Yep, and that one is gonna be a MAJOR ass kicking. Texas wins that one, big time.Quote:
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
And what a f'n joke this Rose Bowl has been. And WTF with the halftime pundits saying this will mess up the BCS/AP national championship? PLEASE SPARE ME. I almost threw my beer at the TV. USC is good, but they would have been middle pack in Big12 this year. 4th, maybe even 5th behind OK St.. USC ain't that great, and Penn St is NOTHING. They don't deserve a BCS bowl. I wish they would have gotten the Cotton Bowl against Texas Tech, and been exposed for the complete sham of a team they are.
The Grandaddy of them all, eh? Old man needs a new diaper, imo.
some people on ESPN said before the game that Penn State had a legit arguement for being in the National Title GameQuote:
Originally Posted by kb coolman
So I'm watching this Cincinnati vs. Virginia Tech game, and I can't help but think, who cares? This isn't even a knock on the perceived quality of teams playing in a major bowl game. Think about the winner though.. what do they get? A big ol' pat on the back?
Seriously, outside the championship game, what are all these bowls for anyway, to make people feel good?
To make their schools a lot of money.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukie
#12 v #19 in the Orange Bowl. Who gives a shit?Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukie
USC v Penn St. Texas vs OSU. Texas Tech v Ole Miss. It's like they tried to pair the worst match-ups possible.
Have you noticed that the stadiums have not been sold out? It's cause no one gives a shit. Give us playoffs. For the love of God, give us playoffs.
[KGB] I feel so unsatisfied. [/KGB]
Also bullshit. An 8 team playoff system would generate hundreds of millions. And they can still keep the boo-hoo whiney bitch bowl games no one else cares about.Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBobAA
How would you choose the 8 teams?
I would use the current BCS ranking system to determine the top 8 teams, with one change. I would introduce is that if you are a BCS competitor, you must surrender two weeks of your schedule to be determined by the BCS selection committe for inter-conference match-ups. Florida v USC. Penn v Oklahoma, etc. It gives a better guage for determining true conference strength, and balances the whole 'strength of schedule' debate. That's always such a bubble item, IMO. It also validates claims from teams like Utah, Boise St., etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBobAA
Not to mention, it guarantees some truely kick ass games during the regular season.
I'm not saying that's a bad idea as it's fine in theory, but it would never ever happen.
First of all, if you believe that the current BCS system is flawed when choosing the top 2 teams in the country, how can you rely on the exact same system to determine the top 8 teams in the country? Either you believe the BCS rankings are flawed or they aren't. If you believe they are flawed, then they should be done away with completely, if you believe they aren't flawed, then the current system is fine.
Secondly, the 6 BCS conferences would never agree on a system that did not guarantee that each conference would get at least one team in the playoff. If an 8 team playoff was implemented, you would have the 6 conference champions getting bids and then there would be 2 at large bids. So this year, the teams in the playoff would be Florida, Penn State, USC, Virginia Tech, Cincinnati, and Oklahoma. Then you would have to choose two teams from Texas, Texas Tech, Utah, Alabama, Ohio State, Boise State, etc. Basically, you would still have the same problems as we do now.
There just is no feasible 8 team playoff system that would eliminate all the problems we have now.
QFTQuote:
Originally Posted by WildBobAA
Why did the Giants play the Patriots last year? The Patriots were clearly the better team, and had already beaten them in week 16. I'm not arguing ranking systems, only highlighting their weakness. They cannot choose a champion, but they do give us a reasonable idea of who the best teams are. Line 'em up.Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBobAA
This is where the Whiney Bitch Theorum comes into play. Virginia Tech and Cinci should not be in the BCS this year. They don't deserve it. But but but...we won our conference!?!?!?! Whiney Bitch Theorum at its' finest.Quote:
Originally Posted by WildBobAA
It's simple. WIN ON THE FIELD AND EARN A SPOT IN THE PLAYOFF. Otherwise, go home and cry to mommy.
Plus-1 game is the best idea, still obv. has holes, but seems like a decent way to kill some controversy.
Why do a playoff with the top 8 teams if the system tells us who the top 2 teams are already? Why do we need one?
Are you levelling me?
Let's just have a 119 team playoff next year.
Generally the people who advocate an 8 team playoff are people that believe the current system is inadequate in deciding the best 2 teams in the country.
You apparently believe that the current ranking system is fine and want a playoff just for the sake of having one, which doesn't really make sense.
I think it's ridiculous that 1-game supposedly solves it all
How about a best of 5 series between UF and OU?
I agree, but that's football =/Quote:
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Sigh..that's not the case at all. Any ranking system is flawed when it comes to determining who is really #1. Why do we even play the season? We have pre-season ranking in place every year. And every ranking system is obsolete after one week. They are subjective. They favor earlier season losses to late season losses. They factor in 'quality wins' whatever the hell that means. What they DO show is which teams are likely stronger than others, so I think it's reasonable to expect that the 'best' team in the country would be ranked somewhere within the top 8. Let these teams line up for a 3 week playoff, winner takes all.
Tim Tebow plays Right Tackle for Cincinnati
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...TebowFox01.jpg
lolGrahamHarrell1ydlineaments
I never knew Tim Tebow also played Right Tackle for the Bearcats.
Hey Alabama, there's a football game going on.
Go Utah!
good game so far, a lot of speed on both sides and it looks like Bama wants to make a game out of it.
SHIP THE VICTORYQuote:
Originally Posted by WildBobAA
I finally won something on FTR, ship it bitches