2NL, Extreme Aggression, what to do

Villain is running 92/8 over ~60 hands and very aggresive post-flop in general. I was thinking this is just a fist pump insta-call situation but wanted to get some feedback from more knowledgeable people as a sanity check since this is the first time I've seen him go all in before the river except preflop. It made me pause before I acted at least.

Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $0.02 BB (6 handed) - Full Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

CO ($2.28)
Button ($3.09)
SB ($1.41)
BB ($1.41)
UTG ($2.59)
Hero (MP) ($3.48)

Preflop: Hero is MP with :ac: :5c:
1 fold, Hero bets $0.06, 1 fold, Button calls $0.06, 1 fold, BB calls $0.04

Flop: ($0.19) :3h: :6c: :2h: (3 players)
BB checks, Hero checks, Button checks

Turn: ($0.19) :4d: (3 players)
BB bets $0.19, Hero raises to $0.38, Button raises to $3.03 (All-In), 1 fold, Hero ??

instafold

he's got the nuts 100% of the time

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by daviddem

instafold

he's got the nuts 100% of the time

---

lol?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by daviddem

instafold

he's got the nuts 100% of the time

---

LAMO

:sarcasm:

villain obvious has T4 which is thevirtualnuts.

Seriously, it's not too crazy to even consider folding this. It's not too Welsh either. More Scot.

Also, raise more on the turn.

you said he is 92/8.... he will 3bet all in here any FD, set, 2 pairs , any 5 and sometimes yes. you will get beat by 75. but there are more combos that he will take this line and you beat then ones that beat you . so its a call.

Even if he only does it with 75, A5 and sets, it's still a call (not taking rake into account). Stove it and compare equity with pot odds.

http://www.flopturnriver.com/pokerfo...ll-173396.html

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by daviddem

http://www.flopturnriver.com/pokerfo...ll-173396.html

---

Just because spoon aint the mod anymore doesn't mean !Luck or I won't link this 1000 times if OP doesn't do it himself.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kmind

Just because spoon aint the mod anymore doesn't mean !Luck or I won't link this 1000 times if OP doesn't do it himself.

---

Right. And if OP does that, then the only relevant things to discuss are opp's range and Hero's play so far in the hand. This is the way it should be.

you've got a one-card straight, the second nuts, you've put in 22 blinds, and it's 132 more blinds to get to showdown. you could fold if you want because you don't have alot invested, but i like calling, think he does this with two pair+. calling should be very +ev even though he does have 75 sometimes. (you need 42%, i'd think you're more like 55%)

you can stab half pot on the flop here with a gutshot and over and bdfd, you'll take it down alot. raise turn bigger, you have a big hand, build the pot.

Next time you post one of these, put your opponent on a range of hands and stove your equity vs it first. Like I say, even if you're range sucks, you can get it critiqued and that's invaluable.

You can never fold here. Snap it up and be happy about it. You're usually chopping or crushing.

Villain is running 92/8 over ~60 hands

Man I hate people like this who keep me busy taking notes while I'm trying to roll a spliff. Easy call, if he has 75 then laugh, reload and wait, he'll pay it back with these beautiful stats. Don't forget to search him to see if he's multi-tabling, join queues if needs be, just sit at as many tables as possible with this guy. Tell him nh when he makes his draws, well played etc. This guy is your friend.

I guess the point of the post I was looking for (besides noting the awful turn sizing) was to work out how I can really put this guy on anything at all with stats like that. I mean he could have literally almost anything. This is where I fall down trying to work out what to do - it's a lot easier for me to put someone with tighter stats on a range, whereas I know in reality I should be able to make way more against a player like this.

For what it's worth I did call here, just wondering how good/bad a play that was and how you can really put someone like this on a range. I was 99.9% sure it was a +EV play (and have read the analyzing all in thread enough times that it's vaguely starting to sink in now).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by crazywelshman

I guess the point of the post I was looking for (besides noting the awful turn sizing) was to work out how I can really put this guy on anything at all with stats like that. I mean he could have literally almost anything. This is where I fall down trying to work out what to do - it's a lot easier for me to put someone with tighter stats on a range, whereas I know in reality I should be able to make way more against a player like this.

For what it's worth I did call here, just wondering how good/bad a play that was and how you can really put someone like this on a range. I was 99.9% sure it was a +EV play (and have read the analyzing all in thread enough times that it's vaguely starting to sink in now).

---

Just make the effort and take the time to run your hand through this analysis yourself step by step, even if the range you assign him is not very accurate. It is very worthwhile. You will soon develop an intuition based on these maths.

Post what you work out here, and we'll help you through it if you have difficulties.