Printable View
This link is a report about Amazon selling a how to Guide for pedos.
Amazon Defends Sale Of Pedophile How-To Guide
There is a comment on Boycotting Amazon.
On the Web page , there are banners and links advertising AMAZON
WTF ???!!!!
Are Amazon above the Law ?
I see the listed address as
Website: amazon.com Location:Seattle, Washington, United States Founded: 1994
Is there a Seattle / Washington / US tolerance thing that I dont know about ?
Am I missing something here?
This messes with my head.
Which law do you think they're breaking?Quote:
Originally Posted by celtic123
I don't know . I have little or no Ideas about American laws .
Freedom of speech is messed up, no? And nothing is illegal unless they tell you to go and be a pedophile.
Fair enough.Quote:
Originally Posted by dneureiter
In Uk , offices , equipment ,assets etc would be seized .
Im happy my freedom of speech has been taken from me.
FREEDOM IN SLAVERY!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by celtic123
I was just trying to make a litte dollah, didnt know it would get amazon in so much shit
This is why we had to get the fuck out of there, kick your ass in a war, and start our own mother fucking country.Quote:
Originally Posted by celtic123
HAPPY VETERANS DAY 'MERICA!
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_f3SZ5Tu916...0/pedobear.pngQuote:
Originally Posted by celtic123
:highfive:Quote:
Originally Posted by BooG690
not sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash256
i'm equally not sure how this could get through amazon's own guideline policies, though.
Amazon DTP Support : Content Guidelines
Quote:
Content Guidelines
Titles sold through the Digital Text Platform Program must follow our content policy and guidelines, detailed below. Publishers are expected to conduct proper research to ensure that the Titles sold through the Digital Text Platform Program are in compliance with all local, state, national, and international laws. If Amazon Digital Services, Inc. determines that the content of a Title is prohibited, we may summarily remove or alter it without returning any fees. Amazon Digital Services, Inc. reserves the right to make judgments about whether or not content is appropriate.Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with some examples of prohibited content:
Pornography
Pornography and hard-core material that depicts graphic sexual acts.
Offensive Material
What we deem offensive is probably about what you would expect. Amazon Digital Services, Inc. reserves the right to determine the appropriateness of Titles sold on our site.
Illegal Items
Titles sold through the Digital Text Platform Program must adhere to all applicable laws. Some Titles that may not be sold include any Titles which may lead to the production of an illegal item or illegal activity.
Stolen Goods
If Amazon Digital Services, Inc. learns that a Publisher does not have the right to license a Title to us through the Digital Text Platform Program, we will immediately remove the Title from the Program.
Items that Infringe Upon an Individual's Privacy
Amazon Digital Services, Inc. holds personal privacy in the highest regard. Therefore, Titles that infringe upon, or have potential to infringe upon, an individual's privacy – or that portray an individual in a false light - are prohibited. Additionally, Titles that are composed of marketing lists (bulk e-mail lists, direct-mail marketing lists, etc.) are prohibited.
Recopied Media
Copies, dubs, duplicates of software, images, etc., are prohibited. Likewise, you cannot sell transferred media from the Internet to any digital format--unless explicitly approved by the author.
Rights of Publicity
Celebrity images and/or celebrity names cannot be used for commercial purposes without permission of the celebrity or their management. This includes product endorsements and merchandise as well as unauthorized celebrity image collections.
Public Domain
Selling content that is in the public domain is permissible through our Program. We may request that you provide proof that your submitted material is actually in the public domain and may refuse public domain content already available through our Program or available through other retail sites.
o dat namblas at it again
Yeah, with the help of the stinking French, let's not forget. The fucking French.Quote:
Originally Posted by BooG690
pretty sure it wouldn't. under what law do you think it would?Quote:
Originally Posted by celtic123
Amazon betrayed the laaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
Why did anyone bother posting after giant pedobear? I won this thread already.
I believe in Freedom of Speech
Also Freedom to Murder Child Molesters
Everyone agrees with censorship - as long as they get to be censor.
Oh I still remember the international outcry when David Irving was imprisoned in austria for holocaust denial... people quoting Voltaire and everything. Now a little bit of child fucking propaganda gets everyone's juices flowing.
I was indifferent about the irving case for personal reasons. I was against it for political reasons. I feel very much the same about this. I think they should absolutely have the right to publish it.
nsfw fail
freedom of speech ftw
writing and publishing this book isn't and shouldn't be illegal.
the fact that it's sold on amazon is kinda surprising, and the consumers have the right to and should boycott them for peddling this crap.
^^neither of these issues are that dubious or interesting to me.
the real interesting issue is whether it'll be correct or not when this author/his publisher inevitably get sued when any given horrendous crime gets linked back to this book
wufwugy's signature is amazing. that is all.
I read an article about amazon's defense of this, and basically the book is not about sex with children, it's about the love of children, and actually discourages the sexual part. Now, they should've chosen a better title for the book for sure, but wow...
I could watch that signature for quite a long time without getting bored.
http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/am1.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by ChrisBCritter
It seems pretty clear to me it's very poor taste satire. I've got a pretty sick sense of humour, but I don't find this very funny at all.
I find this extremely funny, however...
NSFW YouTube - Paedogeddon! Brasseye Special (3 of 3) NSFW
What's satire? The book? I hate when people expect their audience to just know what 'it' is.
Hopefully you're not talking about the respnses itt. Seriously, freedom of speech, press, etc. FTMFW
Yeah the book. I thought that was obvious.
How is it obvious to others that the book is a satire?Quote:
Originally Posted by OngBonga
http://www.supertangas.com/fotos/thu...ed-kingdom.jpg
http://www.supertangas.com/fotos/thu...nda-brazil.jpg
http://www.supertangas.com/fotos/thu...ssa-greece.jpg
http://www.supertangas.com/fotos/thu...-argentina.jpg
http://www.supertangas.com/fotos/thu...dice-spain.jpg
http://www.supertangas.com/fotos/thu...ahir-italy.jpg
http://www.supertangas.com/fotos/thu...ora-france.jpg
Let's try and live up to this NSFW tag. The last one of the bitch making me a sandwich is my favorite.
Nice. I was playing it safe, but I'm not going to argue with those pics.
It isn't obvious the book is satire, I thought it was obvious I was referring to the book though. Does everything have to be spelled out? Are you having a stressful day today or something? Feign sickness, go home and smoke.
Actually, my day's been pretty good. Learn how to use the mother fucking word "it" is all I ask. Your statement was hard to break down because the book isn't "clearly a satire." Also, your avatar annoys the hell out of me. Expect me to troll your posts a shitton.Quote:
Originally Posted by OngBonga
the book isnt satire. If you'd seen the interview with the author, that would be obvious.Quote:
Originally Posted by OngBonga
I'm glad to hear you're having a good day. But I must continue to argue, since I find it fun...
"It seems pretty clear to me it's very poor taste satire."
That was my statement. I didn't say it was obvious to everyone, I said it seemed clear to me. Hey I could be wrong, maybe this really is a kiddy-fiddling guide. The "it" in question is the thread topic. On the subject of vagueness, what is FTMFW? I could mean a shit-ton. My best guess was Fuck The Motherfucking Wankers, or some shit like that. Hate it when people just expect everyone else to know what these letters mean. Waa.
"Also, your avatar annoys the hell out of me. Expect me to troll your posts a shitton."
Just right click over the pic, and block it. That's what I did with your nearly-naked man avatar.
1/ BooG doesn't speak good english, he's a terroristQuote:
Originally Posted by OngBonga
2/ I knew what you were referring to with your comment but the book is clearly serious
3/ It means For the Mother Fucking Win
4/ Don't diss the Costanza
I haven't seen that interview, and since I didn't find the content amusing in the slightest, I had no inclination to. If it's not satire, I'm not sure why any respectable business would want to provide a platform for it to be distributed, but should they be stopped from distributing it? No, but I would support anyone who wishes to boycott Amazon until they remove it off their website.Quote:
Originally Posted by Muzzard
1/ BooG doesn't speak good english, he's a terrorist
2/ I knew what you were referring to with your comment but the book is clearly serious
3/ It means For the Mother Fucking Win
4/ Don't diss the Costanza
1/fair enough
2/fair enough
3/fair enough
4/I diss what I fucking like
See, the reason your statement seemed so vague was that the book WASN'T "clearly a satire." It actually didn't make sense that ANYBODY would think it WAS a satire.Quote:
Originally Posted by OngBonga
As for the FTMFW, you're on an Internet forum. You should really learn the lingo. Yes, posters in this forum are expected to know Internet acronyms. If you don't know the acronym, there's this crazy site called Google that can help.
And really? My avatar is nearly-naked? Are you blind? He's wearing trousers, a shirt, and a fucking CAPE. He's basically as far away from naked as you can get.
That's not a Costanza; it's Frank Costanza's lawyer.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucothefish
why comment if you knew nothing about it?Quote:
Originally Posted by OngBonga
Amazon have now removed it.
Aw man you guys are just spitting blood now, I'm losing interest, it's not fun anymore. Fuck me.
"And really? My avatar is nearly-naked? Are you blind? He's wearing trousers, a shirt, and a fucking CAPE. He's basically as far away from naked as you can get."
Pedantic tosser.
You just come off as pretty dumb is all. It's like...you'll say something completely wrong and then be like "oh, well you're being nitpicky." I just don't get how my avatar is REMOTELY half-naked. You said you like to argue...pose your arguments son.Quote:
Originally Posted by OngBonga
There will be many more times I'll look dumb sir, that I can guarantee. I'm not though, I'm actually quite smart, I just talk too much and argue stupid points for the sake of it. Just like most of you guys, but with less experience I guess, you sad bunch of wankers. But, come on, your just stretching the pedant thing out now with this nakedness thing. Ok, not your avatar, your signature. You knew that though, or you're clearly dumb, dumber than I could ever dream of being. HU for ROLZ? Then we measure dicks? That the protocol from here?Quote:
Originally Posted by BooG690
Sorry. When you said avatar, I expected you meant avatar. My mind's crazy like that. I must be dumb...dumber than you could ever dream of being.Quote:
Originally Posted by OngBonga
Yes, but due to the fact you half a half-naked man as a signature, which is obviously what I was referring to (yes, really fucking obvious), it takes someone of a pedantic nature to make an issue of the fact I said avatar by mistake. You're just being mean, you're not even being funny any more. Pull your finger out, troll me good you slacker.
I actually wasn't being mean...even though it probably came out that way. I, like you, like to argue over dumb shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by OngBonga
And honestly, I forgot that my signature was that photo. That's why I thought you were talking about my avatar and was so confused. Again, I am dumber than you can ever dream of being.
I didn't forget, it's scarred my memory. I'll try and be more accurate in the future with my choice of words, though I can't make promises simply because the vast majority of the time when I'm at the computer, I'm smoking weed, and therefore my IQ levels drops alarmingly, hence the impression that I might be a bit dumb. I am after a spliff or three, dumb as the fucking dog. But not the cats though. There's the lower limit of my dreams.Quote:
Originally Posted by BooG690
okay ongbonga go away now
Who the fuck are you?Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwiMark
row row row
This man speaks the truth.Quote:
Originally Posted by b-rabbit
Why all the hate on OngBonga? Someone link me to thread that started it pls.
Quality avatar wufwugy, your last few didn't really deliver, glad to see you're back on track.
well really I should be hating on both boog and ongbonga equally for the massive shitball that got dropped all over this thread, but boog gives me cuddles at night when I'm scared and lonely
I guess I'm an easy target because I post so much crap and I'm new. It's ok though because I just spew right back at people, I can do it all day.
Commune FTMFW