25NL Stats checkup please

This is a small sample, but I think pretty much all the stats are at where they would be on a large sample. The sample is filtered for hands with more than 4 players at the table.


There are some uncommon stats in this one. "Stole" is steal success. "Fold Steal BRR" fold steal to 3bet. "3B- CBet F" is how often I Cbet my own PF 3bet. "CBFF" is fold to a raise against my cbet.

http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/7...llstats.th.png


Hopefully the custom stats in this one are more self evident.

http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/7...ats25nl.th.png

Any major problems? I felt like I was RFI'ing from the button more than this, but apparently I wasn't (it's consistent on a bigger sample). I thought 50% would be better. I'm not sure I'm 3betting quite enough, or too much, or what. Thought I might be calling too often after getting re-raised pre. Is the W$WSF high enough? Running a fair way under ev in this sample; is the WTSD way too low, and W$SD a bit too high? What's a healthier number?

I don't have the stat for it, but I turn barrel 30% of the opportunities to do so. What's optimal?

Nobody? I'm particularly interested in whether I show down thin enough.

Dumb question but I'm not familiar with your software, is "CBet F" your flop cbet stat? If so, almost 90% seems high. I'd be interested in other people's takes on W$SD% and W$WSF.

3bet seems fine for 25nl, I'm sure people get away with less. It's hard to put a figure on something that beyond the obvious value range is so situational.

Regarding calls of 3bets, we have about the same figure. I'd suggest rather than looking at the number, you filter for 3bet pots without the obvious hands and see how you're doing. I know in HEM it's just a matter of filtering PF to "raise call" and "call call", and then deselecting AA, KK, QQ, AKs and AKo.

Yeah, Cbet F is "continuation bet flop".

Post them larger and I'll bother to look. I'm very lazy you see.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Carroters

Post them larger and I'll bother to look. I'm very lazy you see.

---

Wasn't it lazier to type this than to just look?