Printable View
Its been fascinating reading some of your posts so far, just a question on your style.
It sounds like you have a very aggressive style where you get AI a fair bit more than most people, presumably on the assumption that because of your image you get paid off enough by worse hands who think you're a maniac to make up for the times you're behind. Is this tactic aimed mostly at regs who have lots of hands with you, unknowns who get unbalanced by your play, or do you think it works against both?
In my blog I actually wrote a post detailing how I play and why it works the way it does. It works against anybody who can be tilted or frustrated. It's really a lot like what Doyle advocates in super system ... He's in there stealing so many pots that when he does get it in, a lot of the time he's behind, but the equity difference isn't usually that much cuz the hands we are getting it in w/ usually have between 33-50% equity anyways.
Id recommend just going and reading my blog, the very 1st post is a decent one, then the three posts that are numbered, #2, #3, and #4 ... those are the serious ones where I really take the time to explain and give examples. Of course, the two main purposes of doing this are to help cement my own understanding of my play, and secondly, to pick up students because I really enjoy coaching, much more than playing, definitely.