bet out or c/r?

pretty down on my game lately. Because my game sucks.

Full ring, 25NL, villain is 44/22/6 shortstacked. Wondering about turn. Better to c/rai because he's aggressive, or valuebet and hope you hold?

I think c/rai is better because he'll bet more hands than he'll call with. But I also seem to be wrong on every decision i make lately.

*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to euphoricism [Kd Ah]
takesix: folds
euphoricism: raises $0.75 to $1
bubbasmithy: folds
boyzpound: folds
jonnybafc: folds
JeJeOne: calls $1
haroldpaul: folds
uranus18: folds
CaronezAizaz: folds
*** FLOP *** [6c 8h Ad]
euphoricism: bets $2.25
JeJeOne: calls $2.25 (villain has about $7 behind)
*** TURN *** [6c 8h Ad] [Ts]
euphoricism ..

take him to value town. a short stacker w/ stats like that isnt folding an A here.

is the FTR's takesix at the table?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bode-ist

take him to value town. a short stacker w/ stats like that isnt folding an A here.

---

granted youre going to run into A6/A8/AT here some, you still have to value bet all the way IMO.

You have the nuts. C/r only if you think he's more of a bluffer than a station.

And fwiw, Eupho, just keep playing, keep learning, keep manipulating your game towards conventional wisdom.

I spent about 1.5 years and 250+k hands as a losing player at small stakes, yet now I am likely beating 200nl for a nice clip. Learning to play better than good players is very hard. Just keep at it. Not being confident in your game, especially when correctly so, sucks very much.

Just keep betting and get it allin by river.