100NL QQ

I bought in short because I am just started practising 100NL.
Table was very aggressive raising and re-raising going on thats
why I just minraised at early position to lure re-raise. It worked.
Villain is tight, super-aggressive but weak showdowns 35%.

Did I play this right?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Texas Hold'em $0.50-$1 NL (real money), hand #1,040,391,685 Table Basra, 23 Sep 2006 7:15 PM ET

Seat 2: ub1811 ($192.65 in chips)
Seat 3: busoperator ($23.50 in chips)
Seat 4: tavangeri ($49.00 in chips)
Seat 5: Ericpo68 ($24.25 in chips)
Seat 6: J-Fizzy ($21.15 in chips)
Seat 7: Johnyurd ($41.00 in chips)
Seat 8: Hero [ QC,QS ] ($49.00 in chips) Seat 9: FoldnMuck ($49.50 in chips) Seat 10: wizards_lady ($144.20 in chips) ANTES/BLINDS tavangeri posts blind ($0.25), Ericpo68 posts blind ($0.50).

PRE-FLOP
J-Fizzy folds, Johnyurd folds, Hero bets $2, FoldnMuck folds, wizards_lady folds, ub1811 bets $3.50, busoperator folds, tavangeri folds,
Ericpo68 folds, Hero bets $10, ub1811 calls $8.50.

FLOP [board cards 6S,4S,2S ]
Hero bets $10, ub1811 bets $37, Hero calls $27 and is all-in.

TURN [board cards 6S,4S,2S,10H ]

RIVER [board cards 6S,4S,2S,10H,8D ]

pretty fancy. seems ok with 50bb, not recommended with a full stack.

i bet you have him beat, he realizes your a short stack, and is probably going "fuck it."

Quote:

---

Villain is tight, super-aggressive but weak showdowns 35%.

---

what does this mean. i never look at that stat, should i?

Ya I called him down he showed AdKd.

Terry I find Win@SD% very useful information.It
was my main reason here to call this aggressive guy
down.

If player is very aggressive and has W@SD% lower than 40% you can often call them down with mediocre hand and still win big pots. These kind of guys really dont want showdowns
they like to take pots down without showdowns.

Make sure you have lots of hands on an opponent before you start using Win @ Showdown % for a read. I've had 400+ hand sessions where it's been 30% and others where it's been 80%. If he's tight (seeing less than 20% of flops) and you have 400 hands on him, his post-flop stats are based on less than 80 hands. Just a warning.

I actually don't even display W@SD% on my HUD. I use Went To SD% to identify post-flop tightys vs. calling stations, but don't put too much stock in it until I have 500+ hands.

You have 40% of your stack committed on the flop before his raise. No way I am folding that. You are getting about 4:1 on that last call, right?

I probably bet flop harder than 1/2 pot and may even push given stack sizes. He does likely see a shorty and he isn't probably going away.

BTW, best part of the whole hand was the RR PF. Didn't think I would ever see that out of you, T..... :wink:

PS if this is Foldnmuck making this play on me, I don't reraise PF. Set mine against him....

Short stacked with a strong overpair and decent flush redraw this is an easy flop call.

posts blind ($0.25), Ericpo68 posts blind ($0.50).

100 NL? is something wrong here?

Sorry guys this was 50 NL. I fucked it up because I
played 100Nl and 50NL at same session. So it
was full stacks both (or quite massive stack for villain).
T.

Cardsman. Part of my tactic against superaggressive
players is to bet flop quite weak to induce raise. I
admit this particular hand was quite marginal situation
but this guy was pushing people around with his huge
stack.

When flop came I saw my opportunity here because
I had a decent redraw and made cbet-lookalike. He
swallowed the hook and raised me allin.

His raise was quite good. Flop was scary and
he had 6 live outs. I guess I would have folded
without a read. Surely If I did not have Qs.

T.