At 100NL, is rakeback worth more monthly than whoring if you play ~20k-25k hands a month? Can anyone that plays 100NL with rakeback provide any monthly #'s? I'd appreciate it.
Printable View
At 100NL, is rakeback worth more monthly than whoring if you play ~20k-25k hands a month? Can anyone that plays 100NL with rakeback provide any monthly #'s? I'd appreciate it.
http://www.getrake.com/rakebackcalc.php
I know there are 60% rakeback deals at some Prima sites (Betholdem, 123Poker). At NL100 FR, 1k hands per day the calculator says 20k/year or 1700/month. I'm pretty sure that's better than any bonus whoring.
Google "rakeback calculator" if you want to try a few different sites numbers.
rb calcs are lame and way off usually from my experience
EDIT: the one at rake rebate review seems good
Bonuses used to be way better for 100NL and probably still are.
how bout both? clear all the decent bonuses that are >80% rakeback equivalent then go to your "home" rakeback site.
im still working on clearing all the bonuses at the moment, there are enough weekly reloads to keep me busy for a while. the ongame network has ubiquitous 10x reloads, and 12x/15x are running nonstop.
Im almost positive that most bonuses under 10x are better than rakeback. Go to bonuswhores and check out how much youd make in rakeback and compare that to how much youd make with a specific bonus, it will almost always be better to bonuswhore. Im probably going to bonus whore until I get to 400-600nlQuote:
Originally Posted by Nova442
for 25k hands per month 100nl is still bonus whoring territory, just.
At 200nl id switch to rb as you are looking for good games to play in as the nuber of available games *tends* to drop on many sites
Playing 100nl for bonuses when you can play in semi-good games with rb at 200nl sucks, and not many sites that do good bonuses have good 200nl games.
Perhaps Pokerroom and its skins along with I-poker (noble etc) are the two exceptions to this