Printable View
Seems to me that if play is going to be softer at these tables, one of the reasons is that the average fish has the BBJ in the back of his mind and is going to be chasing with small PPs and SCs/SGs a lot more in an attempt to catch quads and straight flushes. Or are is that just a grossly wrong assumption? How does play change at a BBJ table or is there no difference? Discuss.
I am finding it very soft. But this is over a 2000 hands sample on a Saturday. It's hard to tell.
There is no obvious maniac quad chasing though. At leaset not at 400NL.
I'm thinking the fish factor should be a lot higher @ 200NL>...maybe.Quote:
Originally Posted by Irisheyes
aislephive was saying on AIM that he thinks the 200NL Monsters are WAY fishy. So maybe.
They are going to be softer because if a player is a fish by typical standards then they arent going to seek out the regular tables when the default are the monster tables. They may play more than they used to because of the huge jackpot counting in the bottom, but I really dont think the players themselves become "fishier" because of the BBJ, there are just higher concentrations of them.