KQ, AJ, and TT are big losers for me (full ring 25 NL)
According to PT those hands are big losers for me, however I only have like 6,000 hands. If these stats are true my resolve is this.
- fold KQ and AJ UTG and UTG +1 (Stats also show I lose a lot UTG with these hands.)
- play TT only for set value in EP and MP, raise in LP.
Fine?
Re: KQ, AJ, and TT are big losers for me.
i'm going to assume this means that you play exclusively 6-max.
Quote:
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
According to PT those hands are big losers for me, however I only have like 6,000 hands. If these stats are true my resolve is this.
- fold KQ and AJ UTG and UTG +1 (Stats also show I lose a lot UTG with these hands.)
- play TT only for set value in EP and MP, raise in LP.
Fine?
This is way too weak IMO. In a 6-max game, TT should be an auto-raise in an unraised pot. No way you should only be playing it just for set value. I also open raise KQ/AJ, but sometimes if I'm UTG or something and there's a tough player on the button, I'll fold a hand like KQo and not think twice about it.
Post-flop, these hands can be tough to play out of position, but that's just the nature of the game. :)
Re: KQ, AJ, and TT are big losers for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukie
i'm going to assume this means that you play exclusively 6-max.
I read it as
Quote:
lol no. Full ring.
meaning the exact opposite of what you said.
=)
Re: KQ, AJ, and TT are big losers for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pelion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukie
i'm going to assume this means that you play exclusively 6-max.
I read it as
Quote:
lol no. Full ring.
meaning the exact opposite of what you said.
=)
lol, no full ring
lol no, full ring
:(
Re: KQ, AJ, and TT are big losers for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukie
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pelion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukie
i'm going to assume this means that you play exclusively 6-max.
I read it as
Quote:
lol no. Full ring.
meaning the exact opposite of what you said.
=)
lol, no full ring
lol no, full ring
:(
I play full ring.
I'm going to assume your exclusively an asshole.
Re: KQ, AJ, and TT are big losers for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukie
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pelion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukie
i'm going to assume this means that you play exclusively 6-max.
I read it as
Quote:
lol no. Full ring.
meaning the exact opposite of what you said.
=)
lol, no full ring
lol no, full ring
:(
I play full ring.
I'm going to assume your exclusively an asshole.
um, ok. I was honestly confused by the way you worded it and I was trying to make a funny spin off on it.
Re: KQ, AJ, and TT are big losers for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
I'm going to assume your exclusively an asshole.
huh?
Re: KQ, AJ, and TT are big losers for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackvance
Quote:
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
I'm going to assume your exclusively an asshole.
huh?
I think my "lol, no full ring; lol no, full ring" comment was a bit over the top. :)