Printable View
$6 bets playing one hand at a time
or
$2 bets playing 3 hands at a time
Is there a difference? I would think your standard deviation is going to be lower playing more hands for less money but it might not matter. I figure it's like the coin flipping question, each hand is independant, meaning $2 bets you risk far smaller standard deviation, despite betting the same amount of money each deal.
Variance is lower with the 3-$2 hands. Many, many rounds you will lose $2 or win $2, or some other possible option.
With the $6 hand, you can only lose it all, tie, or win -- there is no half wins or 1/2 losses.
It does not affect EV. Variance is swings, risk.
Realize that the $2 bets are not independant.
Since all 3 are played against the same dealer hand, you will often win all 3 or lose all 3. For example when the dealer busts or has blackjack.
Nonetheless, your standard deviation will be lower with 3 $2 bets, but not as low as if you made single $2 bets per hand.
Are you talking betting $6? or betting $600?
From Demi's point it sounds like playing 3 - $2 hands at one time against the same dealer would be worse eV than playing one $6 hand, which is way more important than variance.
Shouldn't EV be the same regardless of bet size? It's just the variance that changes?Quote:
Originally Posted by swiggidy
Yes. EV is the same.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aces
What some people don't grasp is the role of Variance. Bet size in relation to the WR and bonus and weighted results (like video poker paying big for RF) both affect variance significantly. Increased variance increases "poor me" stories and "look at me" stories. Example -- check recent threads about Golden Palace ... "I won $300!" ... "I lost it all in 7 bets!". Increased betsize.
Yes, if you care comparing playing one $6 hand vs. 3 - $2 hands, consecutively.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aces
But, if you're playing 3 hands simultaneously against one dealer then I believe eV is different. If the dealer busts, then you win 3 hands (same as one bet), but if the dealer doesn't bust then each of your 3 hands has to beat his. All 3 won't beat the dealer every time, which would lower eV, making this betting scheme less profitable (actually more lossy).
I was trying to ask a question and make an unrelated point. I asked about the $6 vs $600 because I wondered why rubixstreub was pondering variance (i.e. What if I only had $6? Should I make 3 bets, or 1? If I have $600 what should I expect playing $6 vs $2).