|
Originally Posted by PokerStars VIP
Hi Daven,
Simple maybe, but not easy! There's currently an ongoing open discussion on this issue on another forum (focusing on ratholing, table and seat selection). Unfortunately I'm not in a position to speak authoritatively on this. If you have an opinion/feedback that you'd like to share, I'd be happy to pass it on to upper management as we are extremely interested in this topic at the moment.
Sorry I can't provide a more conclusive answer, and apologies for the tardiness of my replies. I'm now back in the frigid wastelands of Canada after a couple weeks in the Bahamas. #bitter
Thanks,
Dylan
cheers for the reply, and i hope you made the most of the tropics! start telling people you meet casually over the next few days about struggling to deal with the cold then getting to expand on the topic of the bahamas should help on the #bitter -> #loving-bahamas-memories transition
i looked over that open discussion you referenced
it starts with a stars position
'we'd like to deal with ratholing'
then it goes on a huge sidetrack about table and seat selection, neither of which are really relevant to ratholing.
could you pass on that i think that it is incredibly deceptive to try and introduce the topic of table and seat selection under the guise of 'dealing with ratholing'. They are two very discreet topics, and as such should be considered and debated/discussed separately. I mean, it is innovative of stars to try and get support for removing table and seat selection by trying to sell it as a method of dealing with ratholing. Unfortunately, providing no logic for how this would work and expecting the poker community to simply believe stars' intuitive leap (in early grad math papers i was told that you should really outline all steps in an argument, even if you think them self-apparent), especially when it seems to be purely a leap of convenience, is optimistic or naive. Cheers
|