Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,291,000 Posts!
Poker ForumPoker News, Reviews, Tools

Is Party Poker fixed?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 76 to 87 of 87
  1. #76
    Quote Originally Posted by DaNutsInYoEye
    The only thing more amusing than people complaining about a poker site being rigged is all the people that insist on proving to them that it's not.
    Damn Nuts, you took the wind out of my sails with that one. I do apologize for bumping this thread again, but I think I have something interesting and amusing and reasonable and NEW to say that will show how insane it is to think online poker is rigged. So disregard this post unless you're new and are harboring crackpot theories.
    The other day I was dealt two mid PP's, 77 and 88. You best hope is a set in this situation. Well, both times times I flopped a quad. I believe the flops were 774 and 882. No overcard, no "rigged" card. And it was tough to get a fish to bite on these. It was squeezing blood from a turnip.
    So, for each "rigged setup" that is claimed to get chips in the middle, here are two that did the exact opposite, thus negating the "rigged" profits. Flopping a set would have caused more action, an over card would have caused more action, even four to a flush would've caused more action. Stupid online poker for not taking advantage of their awesome rigging power.
    And yesterday, I limped from BB K3o I believe, three seeing the flop. A K and a 3 flop. This alone wouldve been enough to seal the pot. But the turn was 3, and the river was, guess what, another 3! The only reason THIS pot was huge was because the player limped AK and gave no thought to what I could've POSSIBLY been betting on. A fishy play. And two out of the three these times I made the joke, something like, damn, I don't need a quad to win, can't these cards be spaced out over a couple hands? If they were, that would certainly cause more action, it would be a fine rigging maneuver.
    What the conspiracy theorists fail to see is that these flops, full house flops, quad flops, flush flops, don't create more action but detract from it. The only reason it LOOKS like the opposite is that players are foolishly betting into these boards.
    Say I see the flop with KQh and the flop is A53h. The fishy fish who is seeing it with A3o (cuz Axo is a MONSTER holding) starts betting like crazy, probably never entertaing the idea that somebody else could POSSIBLY be holding two hearts, or at the very least a flush draw. And when the A's and 3's get taken down, rigged!
    If the online poker were rigged, you'd never see this, a player would any experience might slow way down seeing a board like this, and these flops are not the ones that generate the most action.
    I don't need to reiterate all the stuff about odds, and how any combination is possible, and with enough hands all possible permutations will be seen, so that is all. I hope this was moderately helpful to somebody.
  2. #77
    Renton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,863
    Location
    a little town called none of your goddamn business
    Yep, Party Poker is definitely fixed. : )


    #Game No : 3354991618
    ***** Hand History for Game 3354991618 *****
    NL Texas Hold'em $5 Buy-in + $1 Entry Fee Trny:19112916 Level:1 Blinds(10/15) - Wednesday, January 11, 20:16:46 EDT 2006
    Table Table 67185 (Real Money)
    Seat 3 is the button
    Total number of players : 10
    Seat 10: KorbenD ( $800 )
    Seat 1: luggerguy ( $800 )
    Seat 9: f175205 ( $800 )
    Seat 4: whatever1230 ( $800 )
    Seat 2: Renton555 ( $800 )
    Seat 6: Catch__22__ ( $800 )
    Seat 8: jadi01 ( $800 )
    Seat 7: tiefighter87 ( $800 )
    Seat 5: mattrow23 ( $800 )
    Seat 3: kjawz ( $800 )
    Trny:19112916 Level:1
    Blinds(10/15)
    ** Dealing down cards **
    Dealt to Renton555 [ Ks Kc ]
    Catch__22__ folds.
    tiefighter87 folds.
    jadi01 calls [15].
    f175205 folds.
    KorbenD calls [15].
    luggerguy raises [95].
    Renton555 is all-In [800]
    kjawz folds.
    whatever1230 is all-In [790]
    mattrow23 folds.
    jadi01 folds.
    KorbenD folds.
    luggerguy is all-In [705]
    ** Dealing Flop ** [ 6d, 8c, Td ]
    ** Dealing Turn ** [ 8d ]
    ** Dealing River ** [ 2c ]
    luggerguy shows [ As, Ad ] two pairs, aces and eights.
    Renton555 shows [ Ks, Kc ] two pairs, kings and eights.
    whatever1230 shows [ Ac, Ah ] two pairs, aces and eights.
    luggerguy wins 1222 chips from the main pot with two pairs, aces and eights.
    whatever1230 wins 1223 chips from the main pot with two pairs, aces and eights.
    Renton555 finished in tenth place.
    Renton555 has left the table.
    Game #3354995123 starts.
  3. #78
    Bearcat,
    your last kitten looks like a junkie. Is it lying in a pile of broken crack vials? Don't try to pin this one on Pokerdude; this was clearly a case of an overdose!
    Why did you let the kitten get hooked in the first place?
  4. #79
    Well just wanted to add my two cents worth.

    I've been recording games of PP to show, and had three in the space of two hours, i've uploaded them to Youtube if you wanna have a look.

    Just search for PartyPoker Bad Beat,

    They're there #1 #2 & #3...lemme know what you think
  5. #80
    epic bump imo
  6. #81
    wow ......a fish hit his gutshot say 1 in 5 chance and two pair boated up a 1 in 8 chance.......and the site is rigged?. jeez if you don't understand basic probablilies poker isn't the game for you.
  7. #82
    Tasha's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    303
    Location
    At the far end of the table
    Anyone who can show that it is rigged would make so much money that if were possible they would have done it already.
  8. #83
    Quote Originally Posted by Tasha View Post
    Anyone who can show that it is rigged would make so much money that if were possible they would have done it already.
    60 years ago anyone who can come up with the common technology we have now would make so much money that if it were possible they would have done it already.. get it?
  9. #84
    Tasha's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    303
    Location
    At the far end of the table
    Quote Originally Posted by Imthenewfish View Post
    60 years ago anyone who can come up with the common technology we have now would make so much money that if it were possible they would have done it already.. get it?
    No. Do you?
    If it were possible to show an inexplicable bias based on the statistics of hand results then someone would have done it already.
    In addition to which, trying to keep something like that would be nearly impossible. Someone in the know would spill the beans.
  10. #85
    Quote Originally Posted by Tasha View Post
    No. Do you?
    If it were possible to show an inexplicable bias based on the statistics of hand results then someone would have done it already.
    In addition to which, trying to keep something like that would be nearly impossible. Someone in the know would spill the beans.
    that's why we're not *in the know*
  11. #86
    Tasha's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    303
    Location
    At the far end of the table
    Quote Originally Posted by Rondavu View Post
    I hit two royals a day apart. Other than that I have no royals to speak of. It was rigged all but those two days in my opinion.
    Perhaps you should only play on those two days of the week.
  12. #87
    Ok enough, the thread is from 2004 and was bumped by a moron with one post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •