Just out of curiosity, I'm not here to argue one side or the other, I'm just curious to know how people who voted for Obama feel about the next presidential election.
Please only vote if you voted for Obama last election.
Vote for Obama again
Vote Republican
Vote Third Party
Not vote at all
10-14-2010 05:22 PM
#1
| |
Who's voting for Obama again?Just out of curiosity, I'm not here to argue one side or the other, I'm just curious to know how people who voted for Obama feel about the next presidential election. | |
| |
10-14-2010 05:26 PM
#2
| |
I just can't believe he turned out to be black. The people had a right to know before election day. | |
10-14-2010 05:37 PM
#3
| |
I would like to say that I'm going to actually wait to see who is running, but I'm quite certain that the Republican candidate (in order to draw in the conservative base) will espouse what I consider to be atrocious social policies such that I will not be able to vote for them. | |
| |
10-14-2010 05:58 PM
#4
| |
I voted for Obama and if we're considering him against a random GOP candidate, I'd vote for him again. The GOP so deeply insulted me by bringing in Sarah Palin and I still have a bad taste in my mouth from when they got me to vote for Bush 6 years back. | |
| |
10-14-2010 07:40 PM
#5
| |
|
If I lived in a swing district I would, but since I'm in a strongly blue district I will write in Russ Feingold or Elizabeth Warren. |
10-14-2010 07:47 PM
#6
| |
because, like wuf, I am deep in democrat country, I am considering making a protest vote. | |
10-14-2010 08:25 PM
#7
| |
I'd take Barry over the current republican candidates in a second. | |
10-14-2010 09:51 PM
#8
| |
who the fuck votes | |
| |
10-14-2010 10:33 PM
#9
| |
| |
10-15-2010 01:00 AM
#10
| |
my words will sound really fucked because I'm a social studies teacher, but it doesn't matter if you vote, and it doesn't matter who you vote for | |
| |
10-15-2010 11:06 AM
#11
| |
10-15-2010 11:36 AM
#12
| |
How big of a random sample would have to be taken for the sample to predict with 99% confidence who would be elected president if everyone voted? | |
| |
10-15-2010 11:40 AM
#13
| |
I'll tell you who would know the answer to your question - Nate Silver. | |
| |
10-15-2010 12:31 PM
#14
| |
So people who voted for Obama. Are you guys satisfied with his administrations policies, and performance of those policies since he has taken office? If you are not what do you wish he would do differently or what do you dislike? | |
| |
10-15-2010 12:54 PM
#15
| |
| |
10-15-2010 01:40 PM
#16
| |
|
I didn't vote for a few reasons, but I was a pretty big supporter of his during the end of his campaign and beginning of administration. Not sure if that qualifies me to answer the question, but it wouldn't change my perspective, and that's what matters |
10-15-2010 03:26 PM
#17
| |
| |
10-15-2010 05:42 PM
#18
| |
10-15-2010 06:12 PM
#19
| |
10-15-2010 06:15 PM
#20
| |
disagree. | |
10-16-2010 12:47 AM
#21
| |
Depends who the Republicans nominate. I support the Republican party in general but I voted for Obama in 2008 because Palin was so completely unqualified and McCain proved himself to be unqualified based on the fact that he selected her. If they nominate another "social conservative" retread like Palin or Huckabee then I'll probably vote for Obama again. | |
10-16-2010 11:35 AM
#22
| |
I wasn't getting into the statistics of how insignificant your vote is, but that's true too. I was getting more into how for presidential elections, it doesn't matter WHO you vote for because the outcome has already been decided.....or the outcome doesn't matter because "the powers that be" are happy with either candidate you'll end up choosing (no third party candidate has a chance). p.s. yes I wear a tinfoil hat | |
| |
10-16-2010 01:40 PM
#23
| |
|
Well, the answers to both your posts are that it depends and there are degrees. Emphatic categorical statements in either direction are false, but can be true under different relevant and known situations. |
10-16-2010 04:22 PM
#24
| |
| |
10-16-2010 04:51 PM
#25
| |
IMO UG wasn't saying Obama =McCain. | |
10-16-2010 05:09 PM
#26
| |
| |
10-16-2010 05:31 PM
#27
| |
this | |
| |
10-16-2010 07:55 PM
#28
| |
10-16-2010 08:12 PM
#29
| |
nvm, not turning this thread into the these people are our future thread. | |
Last edited by Numbr2intheWorld; 10-17-2010 at 01:29 AM.
| |
10-17-2010 01:14 AM
#30
| |
|
Obama hasn't done anything remotely radical or even unique. His policies have been very standard right of center supply-side. The only reason this is 'radical' is because Rupert, Rush, and Goldman are upset that the money they're getting isnt as free as under Bush |
10-17-2010 02:34 AM
#31
| |
|
FWIW, I wouldn't say it's spun with different language. Top-down econ policies can be beneficial in certain scenarios, yet US hasn't reflected that kind of scenario for a very long time. The difference between Obama and Bush isn't just a rebranding of top-down policy, but that Obama is focusing more on top-down investment whereas Bush focused on top-down giveaways and corruption. Where Bush gives a bunch of money to war mercenaries with terrible multiplier effects, Obama puts money into companies restructuring electrical grids which brings great multipliers. |
Last edited by wufwugy; 10-17-2010 at 02:43 AM. | |
10-17-2010 06:48 PM
#32
| |