Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,291,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

Tuition-Free College in New York State

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 76 to 112 of 112
  1. #76
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    It's a signal.

    One of my favorite economists was writing (or just finished) a book on it. I was extra excited when my favorite econ professor discussed the signalling model of education too.
    Don't know what you're talking about here, sorry. What do you mean by 'signal'?
  2. #77
    Here's a link to his book and a snippet of the description

    https://press.princeton.edu/titles/11225.html

    Bryan Caplan argues that the primary function of education is not to enhance students' skill but to certify their intelligence, work ethic, and conformity—in other words, to signal the qualities of a good employee. Learn why students hunt for easy As and casually forget most of what they learn after the final exam, why decades of growing access to education have not resulted in better jobs for the average worker but instead in runaway credential inflation, how employers reward workers for costly schooling they rarely if ever use
  3. #78
    Oh right you've quoted this argument before. Well, I disagree that people don't benefit from education in ways that are independent of the information learned.
  4. #79
    CoccoBill's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,504
    Location
    Finding my game
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaStand View Post
    Happy 4th of July mutha fuckah
    Our brains have just one scale, and we resize our experiences to fit.

  5. #80
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Oh right you've quoted this argument before. Well, I disagree that people don't benefit from education in ways that are independent of the information learned.
    I think people benefit from it. The Caplan discussion is about why people are paying such unusually high amounts of money (both employers and students) for it.

    Also the benefit isn't without opportunity costs. I think we (as a society) should have a discussion about those.
  6. #81
    Quote Originally Posted by CoccoBill View Post
    ..
  7. #82
    I'm so confused why BS's argument that good universities is the result of great schools is complete rubbish. The reason the US and UK have so many great universities is because they are research facilities with the best reputation and funding by far so they attract the best from all over the world.

    Neither the UK or US has a great education system between the ages of 5-18 but that doesn't mean that they don't have some brilliant schools, what it does mean is that they are massively failing large proportions of their schooling population.
  8. #83
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    The value of an education is not just what you learn; it's in learning HOW to learn.

    Nobody hires a college graduate because they think 'oh this person took a course on culture in Papau New Guinea. This will help them manage people and fill out forms.' It's because they know that people who've engaged their brains for 3-4 years in college are quicker to learn than people who spent the same years in their mum's basement playing video games.
    This line of argument only makes me think that university is a complete and utter waste of time and money for most people. Which isn't something I believe.
  9. #84
    Quote Originally Posted by Savy View Post
    This line of argument only makes me think that university is a complete and utter waste of time and money for most people. Which isn't something I believe.
    It believe it is.
  10. #85
    And yet you hung around and finished your degree.
  11. #86
    Quote Originally Posted by Savy View Post
    This line of argument only makes me think that university is a complete and utter waste of time and money for most people. Which isn't something I believe.
    For some people it probably is because they don't try very hard.
  12. #87
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    And yet you hung around and finished your degree.
    I would have quit about 70% through but I understood the signaling model and opportunity costs and comparative advantages.


    I would probably be much better off today if I didn't live in a culture that pushed college so intently. I'd certainly be happier, making a lot more money, and would probably have a much more developed family life.
  13. #88
    Are you planning on continuing your education or what is next for you, if you don't mind me asking.
  14. #89
    Jack Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,667
    Location
    Jack-high straight flush motherfucker
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    I would have quit about 70% through but I understood the signaling model and opportunity costs and comparative advantages.


    I would probably be much better off today if I didn't live in a culture that pushed college so intently. I'd certainly be happier, making a lot more money, and would probably have a much more developed family life.
    Well, you can move to like the Dominican Republic and be the one-eyed man
    My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...


    Cogito ergo sum

    VHS is like a book? and a book is like a stack of kindles.
    Hey, I'm in a movie!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYdwe3ArFWA
  15. #90
    Jack Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,667
    Location
    Jack-high straight flush motherfucker
    Quote Originally Posted by Savy View Post
    I'm so confused why BS's argument that good universities is the result of great schools is complete rubbish. The reason the US and UK have so many great universities is because they are research facilities with the best reputation and funding by far so they attract the best from all over the world.

    Neither the UK or US has a great education system between the ages of 5-18 but that doesn't mean that they don't have some brilliant schools, what it does mean is that they are massively failing large proportions of their schooling population.
    That's why it's a strawman
    My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...


    Cogito ergo sum

    VHS is like a book? and a book is like a stack of kindles.
    Hey, I'm in a movie!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYdwe3ArFWA
  16. #91
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    I would have quit about 70% through but I understood the signaling model and opportunity costs and comparative advantages.
    I don't really get this argument though. If it's all about signalling and nothing is gained from education, wouldn't companies who hired uneducated people save money by getting the same quality workers for a lower price, and wouldn't this make advanced education obsolete for non-specialised courses?
  17. #92
    Quote Originally Posted by Savy View Post
    what it does mean is that they are massively failing large proportions of their schooling population.
    Here's some food for thought - uneducated masses tend to vote right-wing. So, there's an incentive for certain governments to undercut basic education. The smartest will still muddle their way through and go on to succeed at higher ed, but the dumbest will just stay dumb and pliable.

    Just an idea.
  18. #93
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Are you planning on continuing your education or what is next for you, if you don't mind me asking.
    I've considered doing a doctorate in economics, but I think my motivations (mixed with my drive) would not make that wise. What I'm getting at is that I want to change what I view to be wrong directions taken by the economic academia, yet I don't have the kind of crazy right-tail distribution drive needed to succeed at that, which would turn my decision into a disaster for sure. Outside of that, unless you want to research or teach, doing a doctorate is probably a very bad idea, and I don't necessarily want to do those.

    I'm working now in the roofing industry. The scope of my work is less refined than I would like, but essentially the path forward is a mix of estimating and sales. I use the math and writing I learned in college quite a bit for it, but my experience in the field is sorta backwards. Successful estimators and salespeople are almost never people who come from college, but instead are the brighter ones who started out as roofers. The sorts of skills learned in college are a small portion of what is needed to be successful in the construction industry even if you don't build anything with your own hands. It's almost like I'm learning everything new, and it's in a sort of backwards manner because I don't have the building experience.

    There is potential for me to make good money a few years down the road, but as it is right now, I would make markedly more money doing something "easier" like driving semis.
  19. #94
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    I don't really get this argument though. If it's all about signalling and nothing is gained from education, wouldn't companies who hired uneducated people save money by getting the same quality workers for a lower price, and wouldn't this make advanced education obsolete for non-specialised courses?
    Smart people don't not go to college anymore.

    The success of people who do go to college isn't known to be due to what they learn or if it's because going-to-be-successful people choose to go to college.

    The signaling isn't just intelligence, but things like conformity. If you hire from a pool of people who don't go to college, you're hiring from the pool of people who can't do things like sit down and follow orders and do boring stuff for years on end with a smile on their face.
  20. #95
    Interesting, thanks for sharing.

    Edit: I mean about your future plans.
  21. #96
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Here's some food for thought - uneducated masses tend to vote right-wing. So, there's an incentive for certain governments to undercut basic education. The smartest will still muddle their way through and go on to succeed at higher ed, but the dumbest will just stay dumb and pliable.

    Just an idea.
    This sort of univariate analysis doesn't tell us much IMO. I can point out how economists tilt significantly more right-wing than other academics, and that's a univariate analysis that makes my ideas look better
  22. #97
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Interesting, thanks for sharing.

    Edit: I mean about your future plans.
    Sure thing
  23. #98
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    This sort of univariate analysis doesn't tell us much IMO. I can point out how economists tilt significantly more right-wing than other academics, and that's a univariate analysis that makes my ideas look better
    These things are not infallible predictors obviously. There's a lot of variance around who starts where and becomes what. But, the basic relationship between level of ed and political views is fairly well established.

    Take the anti-Vietnam movement in the 60s and 70s for example. This was largely fueled by college students, even though they were themselves (at least early on, before the lottery system was introduced) exempt from the draft. It's notable that it was less likely that the uneducated would question the war, even though they had the most to lose (at least the young men among them), but instead they were the ones who generally went along with what the gov't wanted them to do.
  24. #99
    There's something to be said for the role of education in teaching people how to think (wrongly). There was once a time where maybe educated people were more skeptical and had better understanding about stuff, but that seems to have reversed.
  25. #100
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Here's some food for thought - uneducated masses tend to vote right-wing. So, there's an incentive for certain governments to undercut basic education. The smartest will still muddle their way through and go on to succeed at higher ed, but the dumbest will just stay dumb and pliable.

    Just an idea.
    Yeah the last 30 years of poor educational policy in the UK and US has been because of that. It's much easier to say unions have had a worse effect on education.
  26. #101
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer View Post
    That's why it's a strawman
    There is an interesting point in that documentary I suggested which says schools were set up with like 15% going into academic jobs, doctors, research etc, 25% going into roles where education is needed like more office based jobs and the rest it was ok if they only picked up basic skills because they were going into more manual labour type positions.

    Then they changed the goalposts but never updated the system.
  27. #102
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    There's something to be said for the role of education in teaching people how to think (wrongly). There was once a time where maybe educated people were more skeptical and had better understanding about stuff, but that seems to have reversed.
    Really? I don't think so. I think most educated people are very skeptical. The issue is freedom of speech has completely gone and it pushes people to take lines they don't fully back because to argue against them would ruin their careers. We are in a lynch mob era like never before.
  28. #103
    Skepticism might be the wrong way to put it. What I'm getting at is along the lines of how sometimes it takes a powerful intellect to rationalize (and believe) some very dumb things.
  29. #104
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,322
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    I gotta side with Savvy a bit.

    Even mentioning that there is discrimination against whites and men in American society is a bad social move.
    Even mentioning that people whom are crying that they're oppressed are only asking for the ability to oppress is met with disdain.

    Seriously. Whom that cries inequality is actually seeking equality and not merely a reversal of privilege?

    Most feminists don't want equality. They want chivalry.
    They ignore that the whole point of chivalry was sexism saying that women need protection and privilege lest the big scary world undo them.
  30. #105
    Quote Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey View Post

    Most feminists don't want equality. They want chivalry.
    You think? I'd say try holding a door for a feminist and see how they react.
  31. #106
    It's an interesting point. I'm not sure what I think of it.

    My view as of now is that most "feminists" are really just trying to weed out weak men as well as trying to operate in the sub-optimal world where men are weak.
  32. #107
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    My view as of now is that most "feminists" are really just trying to weed out weak men as well as trying to operate in the sub-optimal world where men are weak.
    Disagree. It's important to note here that it's actually a small minority of women that identify themselves as "feminists". However, I believe for those women, feminism stems from sincere outrage over an alleged male privilege and a genuine disgust toward masculine behavior that they perceive as "toxic". They believe that the history of the human race is a story of patriarchal tyranny where men were privileged and dominant while women were enslaved and oppressed.
  33. #108
    We're talking two different crowds. I agree with that regarding the very extreme group of feminists. A wide swath of the rest who are not so extreme and are more tangentially attached to feminism fit into what I described IMO.

    The core driver is probably made up of legit thinkers (like Camille Paglia) and sour grapes man haters. My point isn't about this group, but about partial and confused adopters in a fairweather way.
  34. #109
    MadMojoMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10,322
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Yeah. It was my mistake to say "feminists" like it's a well-defined term.

    In my everyday experience, women appreciate it when you hold a door for them (men, too. It's a nice thing to do, but not super nice, just a simple acknowledgement.)
    That's not really what I was talking about.
    I think it'd be hilarious if someone got mad at me for holding a door for her, because my reasons for doing so would literally have nothing to do with her identity, only her proximity.

    An example from my daily adventures on public transit in St Louis:
    I'm talking about the puffed up jerk-wad men who get to the front of the line to board the bus, then stop and usher all the women ahead of them. The women are downright arrogant about how entitled they are to this treatment, and say shit like, "Chivalry is hard to find these days." and "None of these other guys has any respect for women." That really gets me. Do they actually not understand that guy is insulting them? I guess not.

    People are confusing as all hell.
  35. #110
    It's funny (or sad) at how much of the behavior that was integral for survival for 99.99% of human existence is frowned upon today.
  36. #111
    Quote Originally Posted by Savy View Post
    Really? I don't think so. I think most educated people are very skeptical. The issue is freedom of speech has completely gone and it pushes people to take lines they don't fully back because to argue against them would ruin their careers. We are in a lynch mob era like never before.
    Here's what I'm getting at:

    Adoption of market reforms towards freedom of choice are the most likely component responsible for unprecedented growth in well-being throughout the world in all of human history. Yet, where lies the spearhead of legitimizing opposition to this? The universities. Is that opposition due to thoughtful skepticism? Doesn't seem to be. It seems to be more ideologically and naivete driven.
    Last edited by wufwugy; 07-05-2018 at 08:23 PM.
  37. #112
    The sciences in universities have not had to deal with this a whole lot yet. The humanities have all but been taken over by it. Where I was, the more mathematical side of the social sciences, is waging a war on it right now. I saw it in real time, where the textbooks said one thing while some of the professors taught some things that don't cohere with the textbooks but DO cohere with an ideological and political view of the world.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •