Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

Randomness thread, part two.

Page 31 of 423 FirstFirst ... 2129303132334181131 ... LastLast
Results 2,251 to 2,325 of 31683
  1. #2251
    taken from the "things that make you tilt" thread


    Quote Originally Posted by Lukie
    cutting your nipple while shaving
    In college I shaved my chest one time. I've never really shaved with a blade before (thank you, babyface), so I was pretty clueless. I seriously thought that the probability was very high that I'd cut off my nipples if I shaved the hair around them, so I didn't shave my nipple hair. I thought this was normal, but my roommate's girlfriend's horrified look when she saw me told me I was wrong.

    To this day that same roommate will randomly bust out and yell, "HAAAAIRY NIPPPSSSSSS," at the most random moments.


  2. #2252
    flomo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    5,603
    Location
    mashing potatoes
    In the poll for climate change, I voted for warming. I don't like it cold.
  3. #2253
    Quote Originally Posted by Lukie
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    Quote Originally Posted by Lukie
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    after having learned almost everything a non-biologist should know about evolution, my new favorite topic is climate change

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0519134843.htm
    interesting

    somewhat interesting

    but still not lifting
    From the looks of it, MIT's current projection is very conservative given that they didn't account for several feedback loops that would cause an unknown but theoretically devastating runaway effect of warming. They mentioned the permafrost beginning to melt which hold about 100 years worth of current emissions, but probably other ones like the effects of reduced arctic ice, reduced ocean absorption of carbon, etc
    to be honest, global warning/climate change is one issue that i feel completely ignorant and uneducated on. of course that describes most people fairly well, but it doesn't stop them from starting with their conclusion (depending on if they are liberal or conservative), then googling for an article that suits their agenda.

    quick summary?
    It's a projection of global warming by 2100 based on all understood empirical data, and the projections are that warming has a 90% chance of being between 3-7 degrees C.
  4. #2254
    Quote Originally Posted by UG
    Things I've read claim global warming is the sun's fault. Our temperatures on earth have risen the past few decades. Over that same time span, the temperatures on ALL planets have risen at the same rate. That's something your mainstream media will not be reporting on in the near future.
    Yes, there are still people saying this, as there will be for a long time like there's still people saying evolution is false.

    Solar activity causing the global warming of the last 100 years has been thoroughly debunked. Here's a video explaining why. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Sf_UIQYc20 This channel is very awesome, and he puts up a new video once a week.

    Even if somebody chooses to ignore the data, the theory is solid. Certain gases like methane and carbon absorb heat and they are mega factors in regulating global temperature, these gases are being released by the assloads due to human industrial and agricultural activity (assload is the correct term given that the parts per million of carbon in the atmosphere has increased by about 80% in the last century), the extra greenhouse gases in the atmosphere cause a rise in global temperature, and the rise in global temperature causes alterations in ecosystems.

    This is honestly one of the most fascinating topics I've found. The science is very good, and the predictions made by the data are jaw dropping. This is one of the only true doomsday scenarios we have ever known, yet doomsayers are denying it like crazy. But that has to do with the fact of the phenomenon that the more credible a source is, the less likely people are to acknowledge it.
  5. #2255
    They predicted "Global Cooling" in the 1970's. Now, thirty years later, they're saying that global warming is going to be catastrophic. They've all but said, "Yeah, we were stupid. We didn't know what we were talking about in the 1970's. But now we know for sure what we're talking about, and our future looks terrible unless we do something about it right now."

    What are they going to say 20-30 years from now?


  6. #2256
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    Quote Originally Posted by UG
    They predicted "Global Cooling" in the 1970's. Now, thirty years later, they're saying that global warming is going to be catastrophic. They've all but said, "Yeah, we were stupid. We didn't know what we were talking about in the 1970's. But now we know for sure what we're talking about, and our future looks terrible unless we do something about it right now."

    What are they going to say 20-30 years from now?
    2 years ago we thought tight was right. Now as we've hatcheted deeper into the game, durr shows you theres a deeper understanding to be had.

    That's lazy man's logic.

    My highschool physics professor was on a graduate team that was sure the universe would begin to compress after hitting full expansion. Now scientists believe that the universe will expand forever. What will they say in 20-30 years?
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
  7. #2257
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    And that's not to say that you're wrong. That's just saying that if you're right, it's because you got lucky.
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
  8. #2258
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy

    It's a projection of global warming by 2100 based on all understood empirical data, and the projections are that warming has a 90% chance of being between 3-7 degrees C.
    Also, to put in perspective, 5 degree C rise in global temperature is a TON. The warming would be dramatically higher than the global average, the Arctic ice caps would have completely vanished several decades earlier, most of the Antarctic shelves would also have vanished (possibly all, I'm not sure how much warming it takes to melt the cores, but it's more than it is for the Arctics), a decent chunk of the current landmass will be under water (something like half of Florida will be submerged), the cascading feedback loops of unstoppable warming would have been triggered decades before but by now the permafrost which holds a shitload of frozen greenhouse gases would melt, etc.

    An increase in 5 degrees C would not itself mean immediate doom to the human race, even though at some time before then it is very likely for species of invaluable insects to suddenly go extinct (like bees) and we subsequently see a dramatic drop in global crop production and hundreds of millions or even billions die from famine. 5 degrees C increase in global temperature, however, will mean the eventual doom of about 95+% of the human race since the feedback loops would be so great that it could continue on for decades and centuries to come.

    Over the last century, global temperature has risen by approximately 1 degree C. This is a lot. Geologic time scale is much slower than human experience. On the scale of Earth, 1 degree C in a century is a drastic warming phase.
  9. #2259
    Quote Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
    Quote Originally Posted by UG
    They predicted "Global Cooling" in the 1970's. Now, thirty years later, they're saying that global warming is going to be catastrophic. They've all but said, "Yeah, we were stupid. We didn't know what we were talking about in the 1970's. But now we know for sure what we're talking about, and our future looks terrible unless we do something about it right now."

    What are they going to say 20-30 years from now?
    2 years ago we thought tight was right. Now as we've hatcheted deeper into the game, durr shows you theres a deeper understanding to be had.

    That's lazy man's logic.

    My highschool physics professor was on a graduate team that was sure the universe would begin to compress after hitting full expansion. Now scientists believe that the universe will expand forever. What will they say in 20-30 years?
    So what's your take on global warming?

    Part of how I feel about it: Global warming is a big deal because cnn.com says so. Is it really a big deal, or is the mainstream media latching onto a story for deeper reasons? If it were true (and it is obv true because CNN says so--they wouldn't lie), who would benefit from this thing we call global warming? The news sites that get more hits, more magazines/papers being sold, etc? Companies that like the color green? The government, if they decide to tax people/things that pollute the earth? List could go on and on but you get the point...


  10. #2260
    Quote Originally Posted by UG
    They predicted "Global Cooling" in the 1970's. Now, thirty years later, they're saying that global warming is going to be catastrophic. They've all but said, "Yeah, we were stupid. We didn't know what we were talking about in the 1970's. But now we know for sure what we're talking about, and our future looks terrible unless we do something about it right now."

    What are they going to say 20-30 years from now?
    Before I get into this post specifically, I want to point out that the theory behind climate change does not necessarily claim that it's in one direction or the other and that's why it's important, it claims that its ecosystem change itself that is important and is cause for alarm, no matter which direction it is in. We are, after all, a product of evolutionary adaptation to our ecosystems, and if those ecosystems change quickly enough we will not follow.

    Now, the 'Global Cooling' of the 70s has also been debunked. Here's the same channel, Peter Sinclair explaining why http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nTw0...e=channel_page Scientists did not advocate what the popular media claimed they did. Also, this is not the first time the popular media confuses data from peer-reviewed journals, and thus misleads the public.

    One great example of this is known as Nebraska Man. Every creationist and evolution denier on the planet will site Nebraska Man as being a great example of biologists getting it wrong. Well, without boring you with the details, the facts of the case of Nebraska Man are that zero scientists made any claims whatsoever having to do with it and evolution, yet the popular media decided to go somewhere with it, they fabricated an entire story, and the uneducated got a hold of it and called it a scientific hoax.
  11. #2261
    Climate science is solid. It's as good as the science that brings us our telecommunications, internal combustion engines, moon landings, etc.

    A scientist's analysis on climate change is one of inductively acknowledging the empirical data. Once something passes the test of the scientific method it's pretty much here for keeps.

    One important aspect of lay people like us evaluating scientific matters is understanding the difference between the media and peer-reviewed journals.
  12. #2262
    Thanks for the link. I'm still on the fence, but that blows my "omg they said this in 70's and now this in 2009" argument right to hell.


  13. #2263
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    Quote Originally Posted by UG
    Quote Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
    Quote Originally Posted by UG
    They predicted "Global Cooling" in the 1970's. Now, thirty years later, they're saying that global warming is going to be catastrophic. They've all but said, "Yeah, we were stupid. We didn't know what we were talking about in the 1970's. But now we know for sure what we're talking about, and our future looks terrible unless we do something about it right now."

    What are they going to say 20-30 years from now?
    2 years ago we thought tight was right. Now as we've hatcheted deeper into the game, durr shows you theres a deeper understanding to be had.

    That's lazy man's logic.

    My highschool physics professor was on a graduate team that was sure the universe would begin to compress after hitting full expansion. Now scientists believe that the universe will expand forever. What will they say in 20-30 years?
    So what's your take on global warming?

    Part of how I feel about it: Global warming is a big deal because cnn.com says so. Is it really a big deal, or is the mainstream media latching onto a story for deeper reasons? If it were true (and it is obv true because CNN says so--they wouldn't lie), who would benefit from this thing we call global warming? The news sites that get more hits, more magazines/papers being sold, etc? Companies that like the color green? The government, if they decide to tax people/things that pollute the earth? List could go on and on but you get the point...
    peoples who's opinions i highly respect tell me theres no question. People who's opinions ive begun to laugh at (my father and brother (geologist with a masters degree in hunting for fossil fuels) tell me its liberal bs, (in addition to: obama is the worst president in history, socialism is at our door and being gay might be the highest offense to lord jesus christ,) tell me that it's all a hoax.

    I dont know anything on the subject, but ive become conditioned to believe its way true.
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
  14. #2264
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    also, for a senior project in a spacecraft engineering class, one class gave a 35 minute presentation on how green house gases could revitalize mars by warming its surface by 8 degrees or something like that.

    and its a powerful thought to think about the volume of the atomosphere. Even looking at pictures of Earth, the atomosphere looks tiny from outerspace. No way it can be an infinite dump for anything we pump into it as much as idealize thermo textbooks problems would hope it to be.
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
  15. #2265
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    I have surprisingly more opinions on the subject than i realized.
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
  16. #2266
    So I waxed part of my legs today. It didn't hurt hardly at all. Just dealing with the damn wax getting everywhere was annoying.
    I will destroy you with sunshine and kittens.
  17. #2267
    Quote Originally Posted by UG
    Thanks for the link. I'm still on the fence, but that blows my "omg they said this in 70's and now this in 2009" argument right to hell.
    I was on the fence for about a year. Also on the fence between Christianity and atheism for about six years, between creation and evolution for about two years, between several political policies for about a year. It takes some diligent motivation and research is all.

    If you or aboogorilla or others are interested, the best forum information I've found on climate science is on Richard Dawkins forum. Won't link them here cuz I hope to not piss anybody off, but just a couple searches and you'll find the two threads (they allow only three climate threads on the whole site, one is a denier thread). One is in his science forum and it has nothing but a ton of current publications on climate science, and the other is in the politics forum and it's for discussion. They're both super, super long, but they're extremely informative
  18. #2268
    I've taken so much geology and chemistry with climate change topics in it, and so my education tells me it's way true. It sure is hard to ignore the correlation between increased CO2 and increased temperature. I'd add more but I'm way too lazy.
    Quote Originally Posted by Fnord View Post
    Why poker fucks with our heads: it's the master that beats you for bringing in the paper, then gives you a milkbone for peeing on the carpet.

    blog: http://donkeybrainspoker.com/


    Watch me stream $200 hyper HU and $100 Spins on Twitch!
  19. #2269
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    aboogorilla, ha
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
  20. #2270
    did this forum change its text recently? when i first got here the numbers were in such a way and the 'lb' confuses the eye so that it looked to me like aboogorilla
  21. #2271
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    Quote Originally Posted by UG
    I teach American History. It's supposed to be 1865-present, but because of standards and testing bullshit it was 1900-present this year.

    I am also the assistant varsity baseball coach (played through college) and head bowling coach (easiest job in the world)...
    thats alright, nothing really happened between 1865 and 1900 anyway, no worries.
  22. #2272
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    did this forum change its text recently? when i first got here the numbers were in such a way and the 'lb' confuses the eye so that it looked to me like aboogorilla
    hahah

    The forum changed its text a few months ago I think. I dunno what the old font was called, but it definitely was different (it's verdana now I think).
    Quote Originally Posted by Fnord View Post
    Why poker fucks with our heads: it's the master that beats you for bringing in the paper, then gives you a milkbone for peeing on the carpet.

    blog: http://donkeybrainspoker.com/


    Watch me stream $200 hyper HU and $100 Spins on Twitch!
  23. #2273
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    global warming is just a cyclical event that keeps repeating throughout history is kind of what i have come to believe, but its def. a topic i want to research more.
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  24. #2274
    Quote Originally Posted by UG
    Quote Originally Posted by kingnat
    Quote Originally Posted by UG
    I teach American History. It's supposed to be 1865-present, but because of standards and testing bullshit it was 1900-present this year.

    I am also the assistant varsity baseball coach (played through college) and head bowling coach (easiest job in the world)...
    Which esteemed college is able to claim you as it's alum?
    Missouri Western State, D-II, nothing huge
    The only reason I ask was that I went to CMSU! (now UCM i guess).. my brother played for the team for two years, though he's older than I am so I doubt there was any overlap. Go Mules!
    So you click their picture and then you get their money?
  25. #2275
    Quote Originally Posted by kingnat
    Quote Originally Posted by UG
    Quote Originally Posted by kingnat
    Quote Originally Posted by UG
    I teach American History. It's supposed to be 1865-present, but because of standards and testing bullshit it was 1900-present this year.

    I am also the assistant varsity baseball coach (played through college) and head bowling coach (easiest job in the world)...
    Which esteemed college is able to claim you as it's alum?
    Missouri Western State, D-II, nothing huge
    The only reason I ask was that I went to CMSU! (now UCM i guess).. my brother played for the team for two years, though he's older than I am so I doubt there was any overlap. Go Mules!
    Fuck CMSU (now UCM). Damn they were good. My senior year (2002) they had a first-team all-conference player at every position except RF, and possibly catcher. I was second-team all-conference at first base that year, even though I had slightly better statistics than the first team guy (he was national player of the year a season before that so he had the name).

    They were/are badass in baseball, we were 0-6 combined while I was there (I played at a JuCo before going to MWSU).

    I guess I root for them now, though. I've coached one kid that's on the team now and have coached against a few others in their program that are pretty damn good.


  26. #2276
    Quote Originally Posted by bode
    global warming is just a cyclical event that keeps repeating throughout history is kind of what i have come to believe, but its def. a topic i want to research more.
    The primary source that climate deniers give for why they think this is the 'Medieval Warming Period'. Well, this also has been debunked, by the same guy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrKfz8NjEzU

    It is true that there is some degree of cyclical aspects on climate, but that is virtually irrelevant because a dramatic enough shift will destroy the ecosystem in which homo sapiens evolved, we will be selected out of the gene pool, and the science doesn't back it up in the first place.

    The global warming we have been seeing for the last 100 years is extremely rapid on geologic scales (in fact, it may be the fastest heating period in the history of the planet), it correlates completely with human emissions of greenhouse gases, doesn't correlate with anything else (like solar activity as the first video I posted explained), and the theory about how greenhouse gases cause climate shifts is solid.

    Look at it this way, there is enough carbon in the fossil fuels we use to return Earth to the time when there was no ice, like it was about 50 million years ago. If we burned enough fuel, we would all die, no question. But this doesn't account for many other huge greenhouse emissions that have nothing to do with fossil fuels like livestock methane (livestock is responsible for more greenhouse gases than transport) and deforestation
  27. #2277
    Check it

    For the last 650k years, atmospheric levels of carbon never topped 280 parts per million (ppm), but in the last century we have seen this rise to 385 ppm. Projections are that in the near future we will reach 450 ppm, and the long term goal among climate activists/scientists is to reduce down to 350 ppm. Some data claims that we're already at the effective 455 ppm given the levels of methane, hydrofluorocarbons, and nitrous in the atmosphere.

    Why is this important?

    At 1000 ppm, scientists believe it is very likely that we will trigger an anoxic event which, throughout prehistory, is thought to be responsible for numerous mass extinction events. Anoxic events essentially are very rapid oceanic and atmospheric changes in toxicity that poisons nearly all species of plant and animal

    But it's 1000 ppm, it's a ways off, right? Well, not necessarily; this is because of environmental feedback loops that cause greater and greater natural emissions of greenhouse gases.

    We don't know everything about these feedback loops because we are essentially conducting the first experiment ever, but we do know many of the numbers, and they suggest that it may be likely that once we hit great enough feedback loops we will have gone beyond a point of no return, and the globe will just continue to warm rapidly despite our ability to reduce greenhouse emissions.

    These feedback loops are things like the more ice melts the less heat that gets reflected back into space and thus the faster the Earth heats and melts even more ice, the hotter it gets the more wildfires and thus the fewer carbon sequestering as well as higher levels of carbon emitted due to the plant burn, permafrost melting and thus creating a ginormous feedback loop of released methane which would probably be enough by itself to shoot us up to 1000 ppm or something, etc. There are many feedback loops, they're not well understood, but they are widely considered to be a major cause for alarm
  28. #2278
    that's some scary shit


  29. #2279
    http://www.green.tv/6_degrees

    Short video of what will likely happen between now and 2100 if the world isn't gung ho about behemoth amounts of gh gas emission reduction soon
  30. #2280
    hmmm
  31. #2281
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    So why do people still have to tell me "I just dont believe that carbon should be considered a pollutant"?
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
  32. #2282
    Jack Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,668
    Location
    Jack-high straight flush motherfucker
    "believe" being the key word in the entire issue
    My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...


    Cogito ergo sum

    VHS is like a book? and a book is like a stack of kindles.
    Hey, I'm in a movie!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYdwe3ArFWA
  33. #2283
    ha, thats funny we normally just only made it up til WWII if we were lucky... its like, they knew we werent going to make it all the way, but they just started where the curriculum started anyways...
    You-- yes, you-- you're a cunt.
  34. #2284
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    Quote Originally Posted by boost
    ha, thats funny we normally just only made it up til WWII if we were lucky... its like, they knew we werent going to make it all the way, but they just started where the curriculum started anyways...
    that's alright.. you didn't miss a whole lot either. in fact, not a whole lot happened in the world until 1985 or so, give or take. so again, no worries.
  35. #2285
    Its laughable that people try to deny global warming.

    In other random news, I am driving 2K miles from NYC to New Mexico starting Friday.
  36. #2286
    Quote Originally Posted by yourfather
    Its laughable that people try to deny global warming.

    In other random news, I am driving 2K miles from NYC to New Mexico starting Friday.
    how ironic
  37. #2287
    Quote Originally Posted by Warpe
    Quote Originally Posted by yourfather
    Its laughable that people try to deny global warming.

    In other random news, I am driving 2K miles from NYC to New Mexico starting Friday.
    how ironic
    Maybe he's driving a hydrogen car.
  38. #2288
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    would it be worse if he was hearding methane producing cattle the same distance?
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
  39. #2289
    Quote Originally Posted by UG
    Quote Originally Posted by kingnat
    Quote Originally Posted by UG
    Quote Originally Posted by kingnat
    Quote Originally Posted by UG
    I teach American History. It's supposed to be 1865-present, but because of standards and testing bullshit it was 1900-present this year.

    I am also the assistant varsity baseball coach (played through college) and head bowling coach (easiest job in the world)...
    Which esteemed college is able to claim you as it's alum?
    Missouri Western State, D-II, nothing huge
    The only reason I ask was that I went to CMSU! (now UCM i guess).. my brother played for the team for two years, though he's older than I am so I doubt there was any overlap. Go Mules!
    Fuck CMSU (now UCM). Damn they were good. My senior year (2002) they had a first-team all-conference player at every position except RF, and possibly catcher. I was second-team all-conference at first base that year, even though I had slightly better statistics than the first team guy (he was national player of the year a season before that so he had the name).

    They were/are badass in baseball, we were 0-6 combined while I was there (I played at a JuCo before going to MWSU).

    I guess I root for them now, though. I've coached one kid that's on the team now and have coached against a few others in their program that are pretty damn good.
    Nice!.. Yeah, i was down in Montgomery, AL for the D2 CWS in '97.. Mules only got 5th that year, and something my brother will likely never get over because he missed a game-winning bomb that fell 5 ft short of the wall the day after he had badly injured his thumb...
    So you click their picture and then you get their money?
  40. #2290
    Quote Originally Posted by Warpe
    Quote Originally Posted by yourfather
    Its laughable that people try to deny global warming.

    In other random news, I am driving 2K miles from NYC to New Mexico starting Friday.
    how ironic
    Ha yeah I guess, didn't think about that. Whatever I am not walking and will unplug all my appliances so I am all good with mother nature!!!

    Also leaving the cattle in my apartment.
  41. #2291
    short except from a lecture on feedback loops of climate change

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_iBGkSqFAw
  42. #2292
    swiggidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    7,876
    Location
    Waiting in the shadows ...
    Quote Originally Posted by UG
    wow he fell hard apparently?
    I'll be in Vegas
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")
  43. #2293
    Wat?

  44. #2294
  45. #2295
    i burp like a man.
    I will destroy you with sunshine and kittens.
  46. #2296
    OP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    477
    Location
    Iso'ing Iso's
    I was doing some "paper work in my office" *wink wink nudge nudge* when i came across this random interesting tidbit in Maxim's May issue

    Chelle's post in the Word Association thread reminded me of it.

    "Clinginess", the scourge of non-doting boyfriends everywhere, is a toxic brew of jealousy, neediness, dependency and insecurity. In short, homegirl has separation anxiety. She desperately wants to be your number one priority, and she'll drown your new puppy if he gets in the way. "While men tend to be jealous of potential sexual rivals, women tend to be jealous of time and attention," says Charles T. Hill, professor of psychology at Whittier College. So devote every waking moment to this needy nutjob or dump her and move on, right? Hold your horny horses sheriff-it could be more scientific than that. A recent, and totally awesome University of Washington study found that certain proteins are transferred to women during sex. On a hormonal level, these sly proteins may dampen her interest in other males while heightening her attraction, and possibly psychotic neediness for you. It's like sperm hypnosis.
  47. #2297
    Quote Originally Posted by BennyLaRue
    Wat?

    Yeah, that dog has eyebrows.
  48. #2298
    swiggidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    7,876
    Location
    Waiting in the shadows ...
    I won the disc design again this year. W00t!!

    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")
  49. #2299
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    what a strange looking vagina
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
  50. #2300
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    Don Cheadle rocking some cap 1/2nl right now
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  51. #2301
    Stacks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,015
    Location
    Im opedipus bitch, the original balla.
    Rippytyde sitting at my $27.50 document table. Search XxStacks60xX on stars if you want to hassle
  52. #2302
    Stacks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,015
    Location
    Im opedipus bitch, the original balla.
    with a guest appearance from Radashack.. He's railing rippy and sucking on his $27 ballsack.
  53. #2303
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    Quote Originally Posted by XxStacksxX
    with a guest appearance from Radashack.. He's railing rippy and sucking on his $27 ballsack.
    the girl in your avatar can suck my ballsack

    no money necessary
  54. #2304
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    lol youve gotta be kidding. Rada and rippy together?
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
  55. #2305
    I bought a nail gun today. I feel extremely powerful, like I can fasten anything to anything.
  56. #2306
    Quote Originally Posted by BennyLaRue
    I bought a nail gun today. I feel extremely powerful, like I can fasten anything to anything.
    pics
    So you click their picture and then you get their money?
  57. #2307
    Quote Originally Posted by kingnat
    Quote Originally Posted by BennyLaRue
    I bought a nail gun today. I feel extremely powerful, like I can fasten anything to anything.
    pics
    Bah. That requires effort.
  58. #2308
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    Quote Originally Posted by BennyLaRue
    Quote Originally Posted by kingnat
    Quote Originally Posted by BennyLaRue
    I bought a nail gun today. I feel extremely powerful, like I can fasten anything to anything.
    pics
    Bah. That requires effort.
    shoot your nail gun right

    H E [ o ] R E
  59. #2309
    Quote Originally Posted by BennyLaRue
    I bought a nail gun today. I feel extremely powerful, like I can fasten anything to anything.

  60. #2310
    first pic in need of tr
  61. #2311
    wow that's nuts
  62. #2312
    Fallon's been trying to reunite the Saved by the Bell crew, awesome

    http://www.hulu.com/watch/76560/late...union-update-3
  63. #2313
    actually that might need it's own thread, will let Lukie decide
  64. #2314
    saved by the bell is and always was stupid
  65. #2315
    Quote Originally Posted by givememyleg
    I am and always will be a communist sympathizer and a homosexual.
    So you click their picture and then you get their money?
  66. #2316
    Quote Originally Posted by givememyleg
    saved by the bell is and always was stupid
    This is unacceptable.
  67. #2317
    Galapogos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    6,876
    Location
    The Loser's Lounge
    Quote Originally Posted by wesrman
    Quote Originally Posted by givememyleg
    saved by the bell is and always was stupid
    This is unacceptable.
    qft!


    Quote Originally Posted by sauce123
    I don't get why you insist on stacking off with like jack high all the time.
  68. #2318
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    Quote Originally Posted by givememyleg
    saved by the bell is and always was stupid
    saying something like this should be a ban-able offense.
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  69. #2319
    No, guys, he's right. The problem is that he's saying it like it's a bad thing.
  70. #2320
    bigred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    15,437
    Location
    Nest of Douchebags
    GMMBAN
    LOL OPERATIONS
  71. #2321
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    Quote Originally Posted by bigspenda73
    actually that might need it's own thread, will let Lukie decide
    here's the way i look at it. it could have gotten it's own thread. it just as easily could have gone in here.

    it would have been a pretty bad thread though.. think along the lines of maybe 2/10 or something. what this thread does is take 100 of those threads and adds them together, which is how this thread gets rated a 200 or so on the standard 1-10 scale.

    hope that helps.
  72. #2322
    OP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    477
    Location
    Iso'ing Iso's
    Quote Originally Posted by bigspenda73
    Fallon's been trying to reunite the Saved by the Bell crew, awesome

    http://www.hulu.com/watch/76560/late...union-update-3
    God this makes me feel old
  73. #2323
    i never watched it growing up, only an episode here and there, what makes/made it so special. just seemed like an absolute mess of a cliche high school circle jerk.
  74. #2324
    Quote Originally Posted by givememyleg
    i never watched it growing up, only an episode here and there, what makes/made it so special. just seemed like an absolute mess of a cliche high school circle jerk.
    there's no real way to explain it, but it's just awesome

    I think I watched that show every day after school from like 4th-8th grade or something, and even in high school a little.


  75. #2325
    ya if you watch the 4 clips from Fallon someone says it "people woke up Saturday morning and saved by the ball was on and when they came home from school in the afternoon saved by the ball was on"

    we grew up with the characters, and........

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •