|
Spoon, zZzzZzzz
Wuf, yeah, ok that's essentially what I was getting at, and I think this is the discussion that needs to be had. I think there is a very real danger in having these surface level charges against the deep state. Bureaucrats who don't instantly fall into lock step with the newly elected is not the same as secret society hell bent on disenfranchising the electorate and bringing about a new world order. I agree that the deep state can certainly get out of control, and knowing when that has happened is tough. But to my eyes the deep state appears to be a deeply conservative (small c) institution (in so much as it can be thought of as a single institution) that puts a check on the whims of the masses being exercised via elected officials.
It should be expected that the deep state lags behind the about faces of a new elected official. It should be expected that this is even more pronounced the more radical (no value here) the elected official. Conservative (small c) entities act as damping forces on radical entities. This is a good thing, so long as balance is maintained. However, we may be seeing the start of a trend in which radical forces can come to power, then cow the damping forces present through the same accusations which are being used right now against the deep state.
Just a thought: the fact that the deep state is coming under such heavy open attacks may serve as testimony to the fact that they haven't actually assumed the power their attackers claim they have.
|