Thought this might make an interesting debate.
07-20-2004 05:18 AM
#1
| |
Pot Limit or No LimitThought this might make an interesting debate. | |
| |
07-20-2004 08:22 AM
#2
| |
Ummm... not really. Pot limit makes the game considerably more interesting pre-flop. | |
| |
07-20-2004 08:49 AM
#3
| |
More of a discussion about NL versus limit than NL versus PL... | |
| |
07-20-2004 10:36 AM
#4
| |
I read that a lot of government agencies say that poker, as in 1 hand, in gambling, but poker tournaments often is a game of skill, not luck. | |
| |
07-20-2004 10:39 AM
#5
| |
I agree it deff reduces showdown poker... | |
| |
07-21-2004 01:02 AM
#6
| |
One thing to consider though is that once the blinds get big enough in a PL tourney, it basically plays almost exactly like a NL tourney. You can still bet a ton of chips, and a small stack can still go all in at any time. | |
07-21-2004 01:41 AM
#7
| |
|
PL makes multiplayer situations a little more difficult. Where in NL you can throw out a big bet to isolate the field, PL requires creative ways to protect vulnerable hands. |
07-21-2004 02:53 AM
#8
| |
TJ Cloutier compares the two in his Championship No-Limit and Pot-Limit Hold'em book. Here is what he has to say. | |
07-21-2004 04:09 AM
#9
| |
Great read, Eric, even if its only small clips of the book. | |
07-21-2004 04:17 AM
#10
| |
| |
| |
07-21-2004 11:19 PM
#11
| |
I think poker in general is hard to master at any limit. Each limit has its own nuances and strategies for success. I think No Limit takes a little more skill than Pot Limit due to the fact that you cal lose it all considerably faster than the other two limits. | |
| |
07-22-2004 01:22 PM
#12
| |
personally, i feel "limited" in pot limit, because i like to play fairly aggressively preflop when i have a hand. | |
| |
07-22-2004 01:33 PM
#13
| |
| |
| |