Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,291,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

*** Official Politics Shitposting Thread ***

Page 38 of 39 FirstFirst ... 2836373839 LastLast
Results 2,776 to 2,850 of 2871
  1. #2776
    Do either of you actually know who bombed those churches in Sri Lanka?

    Didn't think so.

    Do either of you know who's been attacking churces in France?

    Didn't think so.


    But you sure are worried that some ex-president and someone who lives in the woods failed to use a redundant word in their statements. Lol, get a life.
  2. #2777
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    Yep me too, but I have to admit, this is paranoia at this stage.
    Yeah well it's not any dumber than believing that a massive stone building that's stood, completely unbothered for almost a thousand years could suddenly become a pile of ashes overnight because some stupid contractor left some wires exposed.

    I think that story deserves some healthy skepticism.
  3. #2778
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Do either of you actually know who bombed those churches in Sri Lanka?
    Has it not been widely reported that muslim extremists have taken credit??

    That's really not a fact that's in dispute.
  4. #2779
    Do either of you actually know who bombed those churches in Sri Lanka?
    Yes, I have a very good idea who it was. Let me guess, you want me to do your googling for you?
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  5. #2780
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    How does this not infuriate the Christian vote?
    Because most of them aren't imagining conspiracies based on nothing the way you are.


    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    Christians are amongst, if not the, most oppressed people on the planet. You can't pretend otherwise, especially if you're a person of high influence. Doing so makes you seem insincere and even somewhat sinister.
    Who is pretending Christians aren't oppressed in large parts of world? Everyone knows this. Failing to say "Christian Easter Catholic worshippers" is not a sign of complicity in attacks on Christians. Unwrap the tinfoil from your head for a minute and think.


    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    I don't understand why people are so quick to jump on Trump's dumb comments, while completely ignoring the agenda driven comments form the people they prefer to be in power.
    Because his comments are dumb and inappropriate, whereas these are wholly appropriate responses to a tragedy.
  6. #2781
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSpoonald View Post
    Has it not been widely reported that muslim extremists have taken credit??

    That's really not a fact that's in dispute.
    The group allegedly responsible has been named. The Sri Lankan authorities were aware they posed a threat, but grossly underestimate the level of threat.

    They are yet to claim responsibility though.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  7. #2782
    Relevant info, including the group affiliation of the attackers, begins at the 6 minute mark.

    the facts are NOT in dispute

  8. #2783
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    Yes, I have a very good idea who it was.
    Having a 'very good idea' suggests you don't know.

    When you find out for sure, please let us all know. I'll do the same.
  9. #2784
    Who is pretending Christians aren't oppressed in large parts of world?
    Those who refuse to use the 'C' word.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  10. #2785
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Having a 'very good idea' suggests you don't know.

    When you find out for sure, please let us all know. I'll do the same.
    You can be a right idiot when you want to be, you know that, don't you?

    Read the fucking news.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  11. #2786
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSpoonald View Post
    All we know from this is who FN wants you to think did it. I wonder who that could be?
  12. #2787
    Because his comments are dumb and inappropriate, whereas these are wholly appropriate responses to a tragedy.
    So if I tweet "religious people" instead of "Muslims" when offering condolences because I consider "Muslim" to be a dirty word, I'm still acting appropriately? Because I offered condolences?

    Fuck off.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  13. #2788
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    All we know from this is who FN wants you to think did it. I wonder who that could be?
    "Sri Lankan authorities say the attackers were affiliated with a local terror group. The attackers were radical muslims"

    Are you really claiming that was completely fabricated by Fox News because they're blatant racists and want to slander and demonize Islam?

    Is that really the level of discourse today?
  14. #2789
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    You can be a right idiot when you want to be, you know that, don't you?

    Read the fucking news.
    No group has yet claimed responsibility.
    That news?


    Oh wait, the US knows who did it!

    ISIS
    That's funny, 'cause ISIS is always quick to take credit for any bombings it does, and even some it doesn't do.
  15. #2790
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    All we know from this is who FN wants you to think did it. I wonder who that could be?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation...eth_Jama%27ath
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  16. #2791
    I'm not saying it couldn't have been ISIS, or some other Muslim group. I'm saying until someone is caught and/or some group claims responsibility, jumping to a conclusion is a bit premature.
  17. #2792
    no one is jumping to conclusions except Sri Lankan law enforcement

    They a have reported that they know who did it, and they know they are muslims.

    That's not in dispute by anyone except you poop
  18. #2793
    and it wasn't ISIS. They're done.
  19. #2794
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSpoonald View Post
    What did he say?
    Oh this ought to be good...
  20. #2795
    Who's jumping to conclusions? The Sri Lankan authorities? I'm not.

    I said "allegedly" and "I have a very good idea", because it's only likely at the moment, not definite. But I'm not jumping to conclusion, because my comments are based on the premise that no one has yet claimed responsibility. I am basing my opinion off what I've read, not paranoia or intolerance of Islam.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  21. #2796
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSpoonald View Post
    no one is jumping to conclusions except Sri Lankan law enforcement

    They a have reported that they know who did it, and they know they are muslims.

    That's not in dispute by anyone except you poop
    "Dispute" suggests I'm pointing the finger at someone else. I'm not. I'm saying being accused and being convicted are not the same thing.

    Anyways, it doesn't really matter to me. If it was Muslims, well not a big surprise.

    What's strange to me is how you guys extrapolate from standard messages of condolensces by certain people that there's some mass conspiracy to promote Islam in the West by our leaders. That's just lol.
  22. #2797
    If I were blaming Muslims for Notre Dame, that would be jumping to conclusions.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  23. #2798
    standard messages of condolensces
    Idiot.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  24. #2799
    Wait! Trump's in on it! It's worse than I thought!

    138 people have been killed in Sri Lanka, with more that 600 badly injured, in a terrorist attack on churches and hotels. The United States offers heartfelt condolences to the great people of Sri Lanka. We stand ready to help!
  25. #2800
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    Idiot.
    Ban.
  26. #2801
  27. #2802
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Ban.
    ha nope. I don't even know if mojo can ban me, but he won't, and he's the only one who might be able to. Other than gmml, who also won't. Suck it.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  28. #2803
    You are being an idiot though, I'm only using insults when appropriate.

    "Easter worshippers" is not "standard", especially when coordinated with others.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  29. #2804
    It seems Pompeo's in on the C-word conspiracy too. It's almost as if omitting a redundant word or two is part of a master plan to promote Islam.

    'Attacks on innocent people gathering in a place of worship or enjoying a holiday meal are affronts to the universal values and freedoms that we hold dear, and demonstrate yet again the brutal nature of radical terrorists whose sole aim is to threaten peace and security.'
  30. #2805
    I have never heard the phrase "easter worshipers" before yesterday. Never, not once, not ever.
  31. #2806
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    You are being an idiot though, I'm only using insults when appropriate.

    "Easter worshippers" is not "standard", especially when coordinated with others.
    You are paranoid. Seriously. Lay off the weed.
  32. #2807
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSpoonald View Post
    I have never heard the phrase "easter worshipers" before yesterday. Never, not once, not ever.
    Hope this helps.

    The term is more descriptive than “Christians,” because it conveys the additional fact that the victims were actively celebrating Easter when they were killed. They are worshippers, and it is Easter. If it helps, try putting the emphasis on worshippers in the phrase: It's Easter worshippers, not Easter-worshippers.
  33. #2808
    "Christian" is a fucking redundant word when they are attacked by terrorists?

    You really are a lost cause.

    And yes, this might not be just the Dems. But it's clear that at least some people are conspiring, and so far they are Dems.

    "Easter worshippers" is a dead giveaway.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  34. #2809
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    You are paranoid. Seriously. Lay off the weed.
    What's the opposite of paranoia? That's you. Deluded trust, there must be a word for that.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  35. #2810
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    It seems Pompeo's in on the C-word conspiracy too. It's almost as if omitting a redundant word or two is part of a master plan to promote Islam.
    If there was a master plan....the US Secretary of State would be in on it.

    Tucker explained this to you already. The US state department sends billions in aid to countries where conversion to christianity is a criminal offense.
  36. #2811
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    What's the opposite of paranoia?
    Being reasonable.
  37. #2812
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSpoonald View Post
    If there was a master plan....the US Secretary of State would be in on it.

    Tucker explained this to you already. The US state department sends billions in aid to countries where conversion to christianity is a criminal offense.
    Lol I don't need Tucker 'explaining' anything to me. I can come to my own conclusions.
  38. #2813
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Lol I don't need Tucker 'explaining' anything to me. I can come to my own conclusions.
    Paranoia
  39. #2814
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Being reasonable.
    If only it were that simple. Your problem here is that you are being "reasonable" when it comes to your political allies, while being the opposite when it comes to your opponents.

    I don't think "reasonable" is the word we're looking for.
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy View Post
    ongies gonna ong
  40. #2815
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSpoonald View Post
    Paranoia
    Autonomy.
  41. #2816
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    If only it were that simple. Your problem here is that you are being "reasonable" when it comes to your political allies, while being the opposite when it comes to your opponents.

    I don't think "reasonable" is the word we're looking for.

    Both Trump and Pompeo also failed to use the C-word. So no I'm not just sticking up for Obama (who is ok) and Hillary (who I don't even like).

    So yeah you need a different word. Or something.
  42. #2817
    To me this C-word stuff is just a typical day on the internet. People over-reacting to supremely minor things and trying to blow them up into major scandals.

    The level of outrage on the internet about everything is making it so nothing actually matters anymore, because everything, however minor and/or innocuous, is treated as a matter of life and death.
  43. #2818
    Jesus, it started a long time ago. Why didn't anybody notice it then?

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/89...-midnight-mass
  44. #2819
    Even the Catholics have been in on it. Look, they used the word 'parishioners' in the title rather than 'Catholic parisioners'

    https://cruxnow.com/church-in-the-us...ter-christmas/
  45. #2820
    Can you please just be smarter? This isn't very fun.
  46. #2821
    You mean agree with your paranoid fantasy? No sorry I can't.
  47. #2822
    Omfg. There's a counter-conspiracy too!

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-40343485
  48. #2823
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    You mean agree with your paranoid fantasy? No sorry I can't.
    https://www.foxnews.com/world/isis-c...oll-passes-300

    They know who did it. The fucking guy's face is on camera.

    In fact, there are also widely circulating reports that the Sri Lankan government was warned ahead of time. So someone knows for sure who did it.

    If you're trying to say that it's not an islamic terror group inside Sri Lanka, or that it might be something other than exactly what's been reported...then it's YOU who has the paranoid fantasy.
  49. #2824
    That just went up, you twat. Sorry I'm not permanently linked to Fox News like you are.

    Anyways I was talking (obviously) about the paranoid fantasy of people not using the C-word as a way to promote Islam in the West.
  50. #2825
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSpoonald View Post
    and it wasn't ISIS. They're done.
    Care to rephrase this?
  51. #2826
    Jesus, next time read past the headline before you post something.

    The international terror group – despite not producing evidence to prove their involvement – tweeted via its propaganda wing that the violence was carried out by “fighters of the Islamic State,” reports said.
    Like I said, this happens a lot.



    But Sri Lanka's government has not produced evidence directly linking the attacks to the massacre in New Zealand, or to National Thowfeek Jamaath
    Hmmm....


    Anyways, I don't really imagine it was anyone but Muslims. What I object to is the idea that not using the word "Christian" or "Catholic" in reference to churces, easter, christmas, or whatever, is a deliberate attempt to promote Islam.
  52. #2827
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    What I object to is the idea that not using the word "Christian" or "Catholic" in reference to churces, easter, christmas, or whatever, is a deliberate attempt to promote Islam.
    Who said it's to promote Islam?

    The identity politics ideology on the political left and the media has crafted a narrative that very clearly defines who is oppressed, and who is the oppressor. Muslims are just one of the oppressed. Christians are just one of the oppressors.

    An incident where the oppressed oppresses the oppressor doesn't really fit the narrative. So there is an effort by those on the left, and in the media to steer the narrative back on course.

    Everyone connected to the DNC is simultaneously using the phrase "easter worshipers" today when that phrase didn't even exist yesterday.

    There's no way that's an accident. Noticing that is not paranoid
  53. #2828
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSpoonald View Post
    Who said it's to promote Islam?

    The identity politics ideology on the political left and the media has crafted a narrative that very clearly defines who is oppressed, and who is the oppressor. Muslims are just one of the oppressed. Christians are just one of the oppressors.

    An incident where the oppressed oppresses the oppressor doesn't really fit the narrative. So there is an effort by those on the left, and in the media to steer the narrative back on course.

    Everyone connected to the DNC is simultaneously using the phrase "easter worshipers" today when that phrase didn't even exist yesterday.

    There's no way that's an accident. Noticing that is not paranoid

    Ya i get the argument, I was just using shorthand rather than typing all that out.

    And it's not 'everyone in the DNC' either, is it?

    Someone noticed a coincidence in phrasing between two prominent people who happened to be in the D party, put 2 and 2 together, and got 5.

    You may well have a point about identity politics and victimisation narratives. This just isn't good evidence for it, as I've pointed out using examples.
  54. #2829
    I mean if they're really trying to promote such a narrative, why be so subtle about it that only paranoids will notice?

    Why not just come out and say 'this attack on some people somewhere is bad, but nowhere near as bad as all those Muslims who got killed in NZ. They're the real victims.'

    You know why they don't say that? Because they don't actually think it.

    DJT on the other hand, would say something like 'good people on both sides' and 'blame on both sides' because that's what he actually believes.
  55. #2830
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    DJT on the other hand, would say something like 'good people on both sides' and 'blame on both sides' because that's what he actually believes.
    I really wish you were smarter.
  56. #2831
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSpoonald View Post
    I really wish you were smarter.
    Sure whatever.
  57. #2832
    Well come on man...if your'e going to invoke Trumps comments on Charlottesville, at least get the full quote

    I'm not seeing how it's relevant, but it will be fun to watch your head explode when you fact check yourself and see what trump *actually* said.
  58. #2833
    oooh I can't wait. Here it is.

    bolded emphasis added

    You had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. … You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, — to them — a very, very important statute and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name. George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down statutes to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think about Thomas Jefferson? Do you like him? Are we going to take down his statute? Because he was a major slave-owner. Now are we going to take down his statute? You’re changing history. You’re changing culture, and you had people — and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally — but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly
    CNN took that and said that Trump equates vehicular homicide with anti-hate protesters.

    And they get pissed at Trump when he says that they are the enemy of the people.
  59. #2834
    It really is outrageous that whenever someone is challenged to explain why they think Trump is a racist....the first thing they go to is Charlottesville.

    Yet the "Charlotesville showcases Trump's racism" narrative is a TOTAL HOAX. All anyone has to do is listen to Trumps quote for more than the first three seconds and it's overwhelmingly obvious what he is talking about.

    Oskar, are you paying attention to this? Because this applies to you and Poop. Your belief that Trump is a racist is the result of a coordinated propaganda campaign across the mainstream media. Your whole value judgement about the man is based on a ruse that you bought hook line and sinker because "ORANGE MAN BAD!!"
  60. #2835
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSpoonald View Post
    oooh I can't wait. Here it is.

    bolded emphasis added



    CNN took that and said that Trump equates vehicular homicide with anti-hate protesters.

    And they get pissed at Trump when he says that they are the enemy of the people.

    So you're mad they reacted to this, but it makes sense that calling Christians "Easter Worshippers" is some kind of code for "non-victims".

    Also, you're right Trump isn't racist. He just says racist things and gets support from racists. Not the same thing at all.
  61. #2836
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    So you're mad they reacted to this, but it makes sense that calling Christians "Easter Worshippers" is some kind of code for "non-victims".
    I'm not seeing the connection. You invoked Trump's racism based on the comment about "very fine people" on both sides. I'm merely pointing out that is a complete hoax.

    Also, you're right Trump isn't racist. He just says racist things and gets support from racists. Not the same thing at all.
    Holy crap. You are beyond help. You just found out that the foundation of one of your core beliefs about the POTUS was a con job perpetrated against YOU. A normal person would be mad about that. A normal person would be kind of offended. A normal person would start to doubt every other thing the fake news told him. A normal person would start to challenge his belief that Trump is a racist.

    Instead, cognitive dissonance hurts too much, and you'll just cling to some other fake news hoax about Trump being a closet nazi.
  62. #2837
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSpoonald View Post
    I'm not seeing the connection. You invoked Trump's racism based on the comment about "very fine people" on both sides. I'm merely pointing out that is a complete hoax.


    Holy crap. You are beyond help. You just found out that the foundation of one of your core beliefs about the POTUS was a con job perpetrated against YOU. A normal person would be mad about that. A normal person would be kind of offended. A normal person would start to doubt every other thing the fake news told him. A normal person would start to challenge his belief that Trump is a racist.

    Instead, cognitive dissonance hurts too much, and you'll just cling to some other fake news hoax about Trump being a closet nazi.
    lol you're the master of cognitive dissonance. As soon as you start to lose an argument you either start hurling insults or change the subject.
  63. #2838
    Wasn't that quote you referred to there Trump's second try at acting presidential. What did he say the first time again? I forget.
  64. #2839
    Oh, and who was that guy that got sued in NY for being unwilling to rent to black people? Some non-racist I'm sure....
  65. #2840
    How big a pile of evidence do you want?

    I'm not saying everything on this list is blatantly racist, some of it is just stupid. But some of it definitely is.

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...mp-racist.html
  66. #2841
    btw, all of Gardner, Grassley and Rubio (all Rs) openly challenged Trump's remarks.

    At best what he said was stupidly inappropriate; at worst he was openly pandering to white supremacists.

    But...but...omfg "Easter Worshippers??????"


    ONG-ANA.jpg
  67. #2842
    oskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    6,914
    Location
    in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial...f_Donald_Trump

    This is never going to get resolved, because you think that black people are inferior ""culturally"" but you don't think you're a white supremacist. So Trump can say immigrants are "not people... animals" - and yes, I know the context, and if you paid attention you'd see that he's talking about immigrants. This is not an isolated incident. See above.

    ... The double-think involved in believing it's ok to permanently separate parents from their children after they've asked for asylum at a port of entry, but at the same time losing your shit over Obama referring to people who worship on easter "easter worshippers" instead of listing all the denominations that celebrate easter in some form (#5 will shock you)

    Also eversince yesterday - the way you talked about the impossibility of getting over walls, I now think of you as a literal bowling ball with ant legs. I am seriously out of wits how you're both: able to form sentences and spell correctly, but at the same time not understand basic ladder/wall interaction.
    The strengh of a hero is defined by the weakness of his villains.
  68. #2843
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    I'm not saying everything on this list is blatantly racist, some of it is just stupid. But some of it definitely is.
    I think there is a lot of wishful interpretation on behalf of the author in about 70% of those statements. Others are really old news. How many politicians got in hot water recently for wearing blackface in college? They all get a pass. But stuff Trump said in the 80's must not be forgotten?? WTF?

    Trump did say that a judge could not properly rule on his case because he has hispanic heritage. He said that, and there's no excuse for it that I can see. If you wanna make a check mark in the minus-column for that one, go ahead.

    But you can't find one single thing Trump has DONE that advances any kind of government or social policy that subverts, marginalizes, or disempowers any racial or cultural minority in America. Not a single thing.

    So you really just *want* him to be a racist. Which is something I just don't get.
  69. #2844
    Projecting again. It is YOU who wants him to be NOT racist. I actually would prefer he's not racist too; but I have the evidence before my eyes.
  70. #2845
    Quote Originally Posted by oskar View Post
    This is never going to get resolved, because you think that black people are inferior ""culturally"" but you don't think you're a white supremacist
    WHOA! Careful son. I never said anything like that. I just read data.

    So Trump can say immigrants are "not people... animals" - and yes, I know the context,
    Apparently you don't.

    ... The double-think involved in believing it's ok to permanently separate parents from their children after they've asked for asylum at a port of entry, but at the same time losing your shit over Obama referring to people who worship on easter "easter worshippers" instead of listing all the denominations that celebrate easter in some form (#5 will shock you)
    You've CNN'd yourself here. Calm down and talk about one thing at a time, ok? The family separation shit is another fake news hoax. And I don't have a problem with Obama saying "easter worshipers". I am suspicious of an obviously coordinated communications campaign that seeks to avoid using certain language. I ask myself "why don't they want to say the c-word?"

    Also eversince yesterday - the way you talked about the impossibility of getting over walls, I now think of you as a literal bowling ball with ant legs. I am seriously out of wits how you're both: able to form sentences and spell correctly, but at the same time not understand basic ladder/wall interaction.
    I don't see what's so hard to understand. Climbing over a wall with a ladder takes a lot more time, energy, and risk than simply walking through open land. That obstacle drastically increases the chances of apprehension. What are you missing?

    And with regards to the 30 foot prototypes for a new border wall, I also don't understand your confusion. People who very much understand wall/ladder interaction tried for 3 weeks to get over the wall, and they could not do so. That's not the ranting misunderstanding of a bowling ball with ant legs. That's the documented result of a weeks long US military exercise.

    And just for your own understanding of wall/ladder interaction. If you climb to the top of a wall, you have to get down the other side. IF the wall is 30 feet tall, you can't jump. You can't climb down, the wall has a sheer face that prevents it. The bars start lower down. You'll die if you jump. So you will have to perch yourself on top of the wall, lift the ladder over, and use it to climb down the other side. But the wall is built with apparatus at the top that prevents you from safely perching yourself at the top.

    Again, people highly trained in wall/ladder interaction couldn't do it. So what makes you think it's so easy?
  71. #2846
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    I actually would prefer he's not racist too; but I have the evidence before my eyes.
    You call it 'evidence', but it's a coordinated media hoax meant to fool you.
    Last edited by TheSpoonald; 04-23-2019 at 11:57 AM.
  72. #2847
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSpoonald View Post

    But you can't find one single thing Trump has DONE that advances any kind of government or social policy that subverts, marginalizes, or disempowers any racial or cultural minority in America. Not a single thing.
    Even Captain Retard knows he can't pass blatantly racist legislation. So saying , 'hey he's never changed a law to make it more racist' is kinda irrelevant.
  73. #2848
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSpoonald View Post
    You call it 'evidence', but it's a coordinated media hoax.
    You call it a 'coordinated media hoax', but it's really evidence.
  74. #2849
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Even Captain Retard knows he can't pass blatantly racist legislation. So saying , 'hey he's never changed a law to make it more racist' is kinda irrelevant.
    Then why would it even matter if he's racist?
  75. #2850
    Quote Originally Posted by TheSpoonald View Post
    Then why would it even matter if he's racist?
    Why do you insist he isn't if it doesn't matter?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •