|
I'm not arguing. If you disagree with me, cool. I just wanted to make sure you know these views. If you wish to respond, I'll let you have the last word.
Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer
I could support him if he'd stop lying, stopped with his xenophobic and extremely divisive rhetoric,
Lies from Fake News. When they do that, who is actually responsible for divisiveness?
stopped with his ironic draining the swamp statements,
Different definitions of "swamp" are being used. One is that the "swamp" is rich people while shitty corrupt politicians/bureaucrats are actually amazing; the other is that the "swamp" is shitty corrupt politicians/bureaucrats.
stop appointing the absolute worse possible candidates (kiss your net neutrality and internet as a utility goodbye, and say hello to the data meter everywhere)
Keep this view on record. Make predictions about what things would look like in either scenario. Revisit at later date.
stop claiming credit for the work of others,stop shifting blame towards others
Like what?
, actually stopped war like he promised in his campaigns (and yet is somehow actually gearing for war, increased defense spending with record amounts),
This decreases war. First-order logic and ignorance of history thinks pacifism works. Higher-order logic and understanding of history acknowledges that pacifism is incredibly destructive.
stopped nickle-and-diming education
You mean the beyond bloated, shit-tier results, propaganda institutions? How about we have less adoration for the government that brings us Vault 7, a populace that can't personal-finance its way out of a paper bag, and totally incorrect views on many important other things, and instead have more adoration for proven methods.
and research budgets, and more stuff like that.
Some research, sure, I guess. Crowds out, though. Probably results in lower positive results overall, but the loss isn't big enough to complain about. Other research, >50% of published results are bullshit.
|