Zero Dark Thirty - Rotten Tomatoes looks good.
12-14-2012 05:00 PM
#601
| |
Zero Dark Thirty - Rotten Tomatoes looks good. | |
12-14-2012 05:15 PM
#602
| |
You're just getting older and have seen too many movies, so nothing is original anymore. | |
12-14-2012 05:15 PM
#603
| |
|
It seems that maybe the way to do it is to not watch any movies made by directors "on their way up" when the studio starts seeing their greatness. Guys like Cameron and Scorsese are so big now that the studio doesn't mess with them and so what they make still has its integrity. The same applies to directors near the bottom. But it's when they reach the Nolan stage where the studios want to use their talents but the directors aren't big enough to not have to do what they're told. So maybe the real great movies are ones below and above a certain region where the studio tries to take the most control. |
12-14-2012 05:18 PM
#604
| |
Look at wufwugy thinking too much again. | |
| |
12-14-2012 05:24 PM
#605
| |
|
I'm using really ambiguous language here because I don't consider directors like the Coens who use Hollywood infrastructure as Hollywoodized like Michael Bay. |
12-14-2012 05:33 PM
#606
| |
I haven't seen TDKR yet, but I will probably enjoy it now that my expectations are lower. | |
12-14-2012 05:57 PM
#607
| |
12-14-2012 06:12 PM
#608
| |
|
It certainly seems that way but I'm trying to use it as a level of involvement by the studios. The contrast is that the studios are companies and companies are run by lawyers and accountants and they are pretty much never responsible for good art and are often responsible for crushing it. Joe Rogan used to talk a lot about how he's seen tons of great shows and staffs destroyed by the studios acting like they know art. |
12-15-2012 07:07 AM
#609
| |
Favorite movie all time is Frequency. Great story with great actors / actresses. Pretty far fetched stuff but they made it seem so believable. Also great music especially the song by Garth Brooks at the end. | |
| |
12-15-2012 02:57 PM
#610
| |
A movie staring Denis Quaid? The trolling is strong with you, sir. | |
12-15-2012 08:16 PM
#611
| |
Ya, pretty much any move with Randy Quaid is better. hehe | |
01-07-2013 01:39 AM
#612
| |
|
Django is legit as fuck and Tarantino is easily the best director there ever was. He had some hard stepping earlier in his career, but both Basterds and Django are as good as it gets |
01-07-2013 03:12 AM
#613
| |
With seven films under his belt to date, his first three are Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, and Jackie Brown. Where is the "hard stepping?" | |
01-07-2013 03:37 AM
#614
| |
Lars von Trier's Dancer in the Dark and Melencholia are p good imo | |
01-07-2013 05:35 AM
#615
| |
Something about a wall flower was pretty good too. | |
| |
01-07-2013 07:20 AM
#616
| |
01-07-2013 12:12 PM
#617
| |
| |
01-07-2013 05:31 PM
#618
| |
|
I guess I can't comment because I didn't like some of those as much as other people, but I'd have to go back and watch them again to be sure. It seems Jackie Brown was never that big of a hit either. My point had to do more with I see a refining of his style in Basterds and Django that I didn't see in any of the others. His style is so unorthodox that not getting it just right can feel a little odd. I remember feeling Kill Bill tried to be unique in many ways but didn't quite pull it off to perfection, but in Basterds and Django, it was pulled off about as well as possible |
01-07-2013 05:50 PM
#619
| |
Shame was pretty good as well IMO but i find i am one of the rare few people who agree with that in either of my film circles | |
01-07-2013 06:30 PM
#620
| |
| |
01-07-2013 10:35 PM
#621
| |
Yeah, Jackie Brown improves on second viewing. It's a really solid movie. I hesitantly agree with you, wuf, on KB. I remember really liking it, but for some reason it didn't click with me the same way the rest of his movies did. I haven't seen them in years though, so I might have to check them out again. But nonetheless they are top tier films by any reasonable standard. | |
01-07-2013 10:40 PM
#622
| |
01-07-2013 10:45 PM
#623
| |
Death Proof was a solid movie imo, I think a lot of people just didn't get it. It was Tarantino pretending to be a B movie maker in the 80's. But it was cool, because it was a B movie that self referenced B movies. And people opened their mouths in the movie while releasing vibrations from their vocal box which represented dialogue Tarantino had written in a script. | |
01-07-2013 10:59 PM
#624
| |
Planet Terror did a better job with the homage. Death Proof was character driven with the characters not revealed through action but through the shitty dialogue you mentioned. Not sure I recall any 80s B movies that were character driven to the same depth Tarantino tried to go. Can you think of one? | |
01-07-2013 11:41 PM
#625
| |
| |
01-08-2013 12:44 AM
#626
| |
|
I'll have to watch Death Proof again, but I remember thinking it was excellent. Had something to do with how the twist was set up and its level of believability. |
01-08-2013 12:55 AM
#627
| |
I still haven't seen Django, and I never watched Death Proof. I don't understand why Jackie doesn't get more love. It's probably my favorite Tarantino movie to watch just because its such a fresh and sorely needed departure from his other work. I'd like to see him take a step back and adapt another book. | |
01-08-2013 01:15 AM
#628
| |
|
BTW when I said "hard stepping" I had put some other stuff like From Dusk Till Dawn on him. I've never really been a connoisseur of Tarantino so I never looked into it, but I'd heard lots of people say that he did a bunch of partnership directions with Robert Rodriquez or that it was even his pseudonym |
01-08-2013 03:29 AM
#629
| |
Dusk till Dawn was a fun movie, natural born killers was great but very little Tarantino was left at that point. True Romance was cumdump. Even Tarantino cannot add flavor to the insipidity of Tony Scott. | |
01-08-2013 10:08 AM
#630
| |
01-08-2013 10:18 AM
#631
| |
I still think Reservoir Dogs and especially Pulp Fiction are his best movies. Kill Bill and Jackie Brown were good, but lacking here and there. I see that there is a DVD screener of Django out, so I'll be watching that later today. | |
| |
01-08-2013 01:03 PM
#632
| |
Looper and Girl with the Dragon tattoo are on deck for me this week. | |
| |
01-08-2013 02:32 PM
#633
| |
| |
01-08-2013 03:49 PM
#634
| |
01-08-2013 04:27 PM
#635
| |
I've heard great things about the books, and all the movies are really good. Good stuff. | |
| |
01-09-2013 05:44 PM
#636
| |
i rewatched the pianist today. holy fk that was a good movie | |
01-10-2013 04:58 PM
#637
| |
Django is the worst quentin written/directed movie i've yet seen (I haven't seen death proof). That said, I enjoyed it quite a bit. | |
01-10-2013 05:10 PM
#638
| |
|
I can see "worst written" because it may actually be, but I found the direction better than anything else he's done. |
01-10-2013 06:12 PM
#639
| |
01-10-2013 06:19 PM
#640
| |
| |
01-11-2013 12:37 AM
#641
| |
I just thought it was too close to pure parody and even thought some of the jokes fell flat. It was closer imo to a blaxploitation parody than a spaghetti western homage. If it was a shred more serious I would have liked it a lot more. I also didn't really like the ending much. | |
01-11-2013 01:05 AM
#642
| |
|
It appears the humor and frivolity was for the purpose of lessening the inevitable backlash from those who get upset when they hear the word "nigger". The movie had a bunch of really subtle parts meant to counter any appearance of blacksploitation as well, like the half a second shot of Django's huge bulge in his pant leg and the fact that the only words he couldn't pronounce were "gang" and another similar one I don't remember. Also, the purpose of many of the jokes was just to make the whites look idiotic. |
01-11-2013 01:27 AM
#643
| |
Saw Déjà vu by Tony Scott yesterday and however badly it was written and directed, I enjoyed it from start to finish just because the story was pretty fresh. DW is always easy to watch. | |
| |
01-11-2013 01:28 AM
#644
| |
| |
01-11-2013 09:49 AM
#645
| |
| |
01-11-2013 09:55 AM
#646
| |
It does | |
01-11-2013 11:08 AM
#647
| |
The end was stupid yeah but I really enjoyed the rest of the movie. Not Tarantino's best. | |
| |
01-11-2013 01:12 PM
#648
| |
Movies in theaters right now that are must see: | |
01-11-2013 01:18 PM
#649
| |
Is Hobbit good? Haven't seen it yet | |
01-11-2013 02:31 PM
#650
| |
I've recently seen: | |
01-11-2013 05:01 PM
#651
| |
|
I think the ending is great |
01-12-2013 12:27 AM
#652
| |
Cloud atlas is simply epic. | |
| |
01-12-2013 02:07 AM
#653
| |
Cloud Atlas was a weird concept but fun to watch. My fav part was the credits. | |
01-13-2013 04:12 AM
#654
| |
Django is a lock for Best Picture. Among many awards, such as props and shit. | |
Last edited by Jack Sawyer; 01-13-2013 at 05:17 AM.
| |
01-13-2013 05:20 AM
#655
| |
Waltz was great, Di Caprio was fine but not spectacular imo. | |
Last edited by rong; 01-13-2013 at 05:28 AM.
| |
01-13-2013 09:15 AM
#656
| |
Tarantino does a lot of things very well. Django doesn't even seem that difficult to make and I have to believe that's entirely on the back of Tarryteens talents. | |
| |
01-16-2013 10:23 PM
#657
| |
|
lollllllllllllllllll |
01-19-2013 03:09 AM
#658
| |
Anyone seen Gangster Squad? Is it anything to look forward to when it reaches us over here? | |
| |
01-26-2013 04:28 PM
#659
| |
Flight is worth watching for the crash scene alone. | |
| |
01-26-2013 05:00 PM
#660
| |
See Cloud Atlas, but for all that is sacred - read the novel first if you like reading. It is a masterpiece. Unfortunately, seeing the movie first will without a doubt take away from the experience. | |
| |
01-27-2013 05:30 AM
#661
| |
| |
01-27-2013 08:33 AM
#662
| |
Watched The Hobbit a few days ago. A great watch but my main problem was that you had no affinity with many of the dwarves, the dwarven king also looked too human and Bilbo coulda been cast been better (just compare him with the convincing hobbits from LOTR) - there's 2 more parts in which he can redeem himself to me though. But, once they reached the Goblin King and everything that followed, that was just super. | |
| |
01-27-2013 12:46 PM
#663
| |
|
I read Hobbit twice and hated it both times, partly because I felt no affinity to any of the dwarves. I think I'll try the movie though |
01-27-2013 01:28 PM
#664
| |
03-29-2013 08:03 PM
#665
| |
Wreck it Ralph was good. | |
| |
05-19-2013 12:37 PM
#666
| |
I just started finishing Enter the Void by Gaspar Noé. | |
Last edited by oskar; 05-19-2013 at 12:46 PM.
| |
05-19-2013 02:06 PM
#667
| |
I started Enter the Void, and I just couldn't do it. Maybe I'll try again sometime, but it was just too abstract. | |
05-19-2013 06:55 PM
#668
| |
BANNED
|
|
05-19-2013 10:50 PM
#669
| |
I've read the Hobbit now several times. I'm on the second time through reading it out loud (two kid #2). I would agree it's difficult to draw affinity to the dwarves. There are too many to create characters for each, and they only ones you really get to know are the fat one and Fili, one of the younger ones, none of the others really do jack shit. It's very reminiscent of the movie 13th Warrior, where you have this pack of supposed bad asses, but you never learn shit about any of them. | |
Last edited by kingnat; 05-19-2013 at 10:55 PM.
| |
05-19-2013 11:33 PM
#670
| |
Since Kingnat started quoting old Hobbit posts I'll do the same. I watched the Hobbit the other night and really wasn't impressed at all. It took nearly an hour to get things rolling with nothing really being established in that first bit and some scenes that I assume were thrown in there because they look cool in 3d (see: ridiculous circus scene in Bilbo's residence). | |
| |
05-20-2013 07:40 AM
#671
| |
Yay, you can't just watch it any time. A couple of weeks back I watched Last Action Hero in an Arnie marathon and thought how awesome it is that they would use | |
Last edited by oskar; 05-20-2013 at 03:53 PM.
| |
05-20-2013 02:57 PM
#672
| |
BANNED
|
|
05-20-2013 03:52 PM
#673
| |
Jamie Lee Curtis was great in this! | |
| |
05-20-2013 09:11 PM
#674
| |
BANNED
|
You won't regret it. Great Movie. |
05-21-2013 03:35 PM
#675
| |
I watched it last week and I wouldn't recommend it. The movie is riddled with clichés which makes it annoying and predictable, and the main character is just delivering his lines, not even acting, showing no commitment to the story or what is going in. Me and my friend just resorted to laughing at the movie to have some fun with it. Constantly predicting what is going to happen can be fun too, just makes me wonder what kind of crowd would genuinly like this movie. | |
| |