And what is Trump's campaign message going to be? I mean I'm sure he'll come up with a nickname for his opponent, but other than that what's his brag? The economy hasn't tanked yet?
04-22-2019 06:29 PM
#4501
| |
And what is Trump's campaign message going to be? I mean I'm sure he'll come up with a nickname for his opponent, but other than that what's his brag? The economy hasn't tanked yet? | |
04-22-2019 06:32 PM
#4502
| |
Oh I know "Trump in 2020 - No collusion!" | |
04-22-2019 06:36 PM
#4503
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
04-22-2019 06:37 PM
#4504
| |
04-22-2019 06:40 PM
#4505
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
04-22-2019 06:40 PM
#4506
| |
Even Biden could beat him I think. President Touchy Feely. | |
04-22-2019 06:40 PM
#4507
| |
04-22-2019 06:49 PM
#4508
| |
![]() ![]()
|
You think the country is up for another Obama term? After 8 years of that, the country was mad enough to elect Trump. Does not compute. |
04-23-2019 11:21 AM
#4509
| |
You're not putting enough weight on the fact that Mueller holds the opinion that a sitting president cannot be indicted. Under NO circumstances could he say the president had committed any crime, given that premise. | |
| |
04-23-2019 11:32 AM
#4510
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Spare me the legalese nuances please. It doesn't matter. The guy was the subject of the most relentless investigation of all time, and he came out ahead! |
Last edited by TheSpoonald; 04-23-2019 at 11:35 AM. | |
04-23-2019 11:46 AM
#4511
| |
| |
04-23-2019 12:03 PM
#4512
| |
So you have so much cognitive dissonance about the implications of the answer to my question that you can't even answer the question? | |
Last edited by MadMojoMonkey; 04-23-2019 at 12:06 PM.
| |
04-23-2019 12:20 PM
#4513
| |
Mueller DID say what happened, he just didn't express an opinion about the guilt of the POTUS in regards to it. That's not the same as an exoneration for reasons that myself, Mojo Oskar, and probably everyone who isn't on Fox News have tried to explain to you. | |
04-23-2019 12:30 PM
#4514
| |
| |
04-23-2019 12:36 PM
#4515
| |
It could. They won't get it through the senate but that didn't stop them from impeaching Clinton. | |
04-23-2019 01:00 PM
#4516
| |
"I guarantee you [impeachment] is not the first item on anybody's agenda that would be chairing these committees." is the final word in the article. | |
| |
04-23-2019 01:18 PM
#4517
| |
Well, their main focus is on beating him in 2020. If they think impeachment will help them do that then they will. | |
04-23-2019 01:25 PM
#4518
| |
![]() ![]()
|
First of all, I want to point out that Republicans have been screaming that it's unconstitutional to induct a sitting president for two years now. And in response, every leftist mouthpiece trotted out a legal expert who claimed "au contraire mon frere....you totally can" |
04-23-2019 01:36 PM
#4519
| |
![]() ![]()
|
MMM explain to me why Mueller gave us so much info....including kinda shameless innuendos.....on obstruction of justice. If anyone wanted to accuse Trump of OOJ, they have all the evidence they're ever gonna get. |
04-23-2019 01:39 PM
#4520
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Just so we are clear, I want to reiterate that if a presidential candidate had an explicit quid pro quo arrangement with the Russian government, that is *not* at crime. |
04-23-2019 01:48 PM
#4521
| |
Wow you're really talking yourself in circles here. | |
04-23-2019 01:55 PM
#4522
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Your inability to grasp straight-line logic doesn't mean it's circular. |
04-23-2019 02:01 PM
#4523
| |
I'm afraid you don't actually understand anything about what the Mueller Investigation's purpose was. It wasn't to try to frame Trump for treason, despite what Tucker Carlson might want you to think. It was to investigate Russian interference. | |
04-23-2019 02:03 PM
#4524
| |
04-23-2019 02:08 PM
#4525
| |
Don't forget that Trump tried to obstruct an investigation that was going to clear him of treason. You can draw two possible conclusions from this: | |
04-23-2019 02:13 PM
#4526
| |
I wouldn't be so sure. Not going to happen immediately. Not going to go through the senate, but it would be a good idea politically. I think a lot of people don't really understand how serious the Mueller report is. Understandably because William Barr repeatedly lied about it. | |
| |
04-23-2019 02:14 PM
#4527
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Wrong. |
04-23-2019 02:15 PM
#4528
| |
Banana, I'd still love for you to tell me in your own words what you think the Mueller investigation investigated. | |
| |
04-23-2019 02:15 PM
#4529
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
04-23-2019 02:17 PM
#4530
| |
Same reason he didn't get Mexico to pay for the wall he's not building. | |
| |
04-23-2019 02:17 PM
#4531
| |
04-23-2019 02:17 PM
#4532
| |
Non-sequitur. | |
| |
04-23-2019 02:18 PM
#4533
| |
04-23-2019 02:18 PM
#4534
| |
![]() ![]()
|
The authorizing document for the special counsel investigation lists three purposes of the investigation. |
04-23-2019 02:31 PM
#4535
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Yes. I get it. You can stop trying to walk me through this like I'm a 3 year old. I understand that Mueller found Trump to be "not not guilty" or whatever bullshit legalese term just got invented this week. |
04-23-2019 02:32 PM
#4536
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
04-23-2019 02:34 PM
#4537
| |
| |
| |
04-23-2019 02:35 PM
#4538
| |
As fun as it would be to see Trump testifying before Congress, it's probably too close to election time for an impeachment. I do hope they televise his trials after the new president gets inaugurated though. | |
04-23-2019 02:42 PM
#4539
| |
04-23-2019 02:43 PM
#4540
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Care to elaborate? Because it's not unreasonable for a Presidential campaign, a transition team, or an incoming administration to have contacts with all sorts of foreign dignitaries. Did they find any links between the Trump campaign and Canada? What about Mexico? What about Poland? What about Japan? Was Trump colluding with all of those countries too? |
04-23-2019 02:44 PM
#4541
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
04-23-2019 02:48 PM
#4542
| |
04-23-2019 02:52 PM
#4543
| |
Ok can you show me when Trump acknowledged that election interference happened? | |
| |
04-23-2019 02:54 PM
#4544
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
04-23-2019 02:55 PM
#4545
| |
Oh, your breitbart article links back to itself. They cite old breitbart articles as proof that those allegations were false, when they have been corroborated by the mueller report. | |
| |
04-23-2019 02:56 PM
#4546
| |
![]() ![]()
|
It was the next goddamn day!! Don't you think the fake news should have told you that?? |
04-23-2019 02:59 PM
#4547
| |
![]() ![]()
|
I'm glad we got to the bottom of two major hoaxes that poop and Oskar believe. |
04-23-2019 02:59 PM
#4548
| |
"invented this week" | |
| |
04-23-2019 03:02 PM
#4549
| |
04-23-2019 03:03 PM
#4550
| |
Saying you have “full faith and support for America's intelligence agencies" is not the same as saying you understand that russia interfered in the election to help you and hurt your opponent. | |
| |
04-23-2019 03:07 PM
#4551
| |
Trump also said, in Finland, that Putin strongly denied it and he (Trump) believed him (in so many words). | |
04-23-2019 03:09 PM
#4552
| |
... and I don't think he ever walked it back. His press team put out that ridiculous statement that Trump meant to double negate, but that was about it. | |
| |
04-23-2019 03:12 PM
#4553
| |
Ya, but Trump's only being picked on by all the orangemanbad people when he gets criticism for saying whacko shit like that, don't forget. They should be more understanding. | |
04-23-2019 03:13 PM
#4554
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Great. Show me one time that term appears anywhere else before this week. I've heard "guilty" and "innocent" a billion times. This is the first time I've ever heard "not not guilty" |
04-23-2019 03:14 PM
#4555
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
04-23-2019 03:15 PM
#4556
| |
04-23-2019 03:19 PM
#4557
| |
^^ | |
04-23-2019 03:19 PM
#4558
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
04-23-2019 03:21 PM
#4559
| |
04-23-2019 03:25 PM
#4560
| |
In case that's still too complicated for you, let me explain it a different way. | |
04-23-2019 03:29 PM
#4561
| |
So can you concede that: | |
| |
04-23-2019 04:00 PM
#4562
| |
![]() ![]()
|
No. First, define "interfered". If you mean "bought facebook ads" I'm just not there with ya man. |
Last edited by TheSpoonald; 04-23-2019 at 04:28 PM. | |
04-23-2019 04:32 PM
#4563
| |
![]() ![]()
|
I'm wondering why you presume to read the mind of an experienced prosecutor. |
04-23-2019 04:43 PM
#4564
| |
I do find it piss funny that people are outraged at the mere idea that Russia "interfered" with the USA election, considering it's what USA has been doing to other nations for as long as USA has been a country. | |
| |
04-23-2019 04:46 PM
#4565
| |
@spoon | |
| |
04-23-2019 04:47 PM
#4566
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
04-23-2019 04:49 PM
#4567
| |
Let's not call him "spoon". He's not spoon, that's the misogynist with two girlfriends (so he says). | |
| |
04-23-2019 04:55 PM
#4568
| |
Yeah they should be outraged about other things. | |
04-23-2019 04:56 PM
#4569
| |
04-23-2019 04:58 PM
#4570
| |
Also, someone should dig up that picture of spoon with his fat ugly harem. That was pretty funny. | |
04-23-2019 05:44 PM
#4571
| |
I'm wondering why you wonder that when you're perfectly willing to presume to understand him better than I do. | |
04-23-2019 06:05 PM
#4572
| |
![]() ![]()
|
MMM. I'm not going to respond in snippets anymore, it's too long now. Let me just see if I can rephrase your argument exactly as I understand it, and demonstrate to you how silly it is. Instead of legalese, we will use scientific terms that I'm sure you understand. |
Last edited by TheSpoonald; 04-23-2019 at 06:11 PM. | |
04-23-2019 06:16 PM
#4573
| |
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/23/u...es-of-war.html | |
| |
04-23-2019 06:18 PM
#4574
| |
![]() ![]()
|
You'll have to be more specific. I'm not saying I don't do this. I'm sure it happens alot so I need to know what exactly you're referring to. I frequently use "you" when I'm not actually addressing you, MMM, specifically. |
Last edited by TheSpoonald; 04-23-2019 at 06:22 PM. | |
04-23-2019 06:18 PM
#4575
| |
| |