|
I don't need to argue against the points you're making. You'er doing a fine job burying yourself. I'm just calling out the contradiction in your points and asking you to explain it.
How is a custom painting desecrating muhammed different than a custom cake celebrating gay marriage?
How are you making a distinction unless you're drawing some arbitrary line between the two defining the borderline between what is offensive and what isn't.
And if that's what you're doing, what gives you the right?
What gives the government the right?
|