*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[wufwugy]

I haven't watched the whole thing yet. I probably should.

Wuf. I know you're going to watch it. Just as a goof: Could you timestamp me a bit where you thought the president sounded coherent.

That would be tough for me to do since I don't like listening to his conversational style and because he always jumps from pseudo-non-sequitur to pseudo-non-sequitur.

If the claim "he's incoherent" derives from the observation "he clucks like a hen" then it's a good observation. If the same claim derives from the statement "I can't understand him," I'd say the claim is user error.

[wufwugy]

[Poopadoop]

If the claim "he's incoherent" derives from the observation "he clucks like a hen" then it's a good observation.

No-one says that afaik.

If the same claim derives from the statement "I can't understand him,"

It's not that he slurs his words. You can understand individual words and phrases. It's that there's no clear train of thought behind his words and phrases, and that much of it is apropos of nothing. E.g., he spoke (again) about the electoral college and how he wasn't supposed to win the election. First, no-one asked him about that. Second, the election was 18 months ago ffs, there's more important things going on today.

he always jumps from pseudo-non-sequitur to pseudo-non-sequitur.

Pretty much nails it.

[BananaStand]

It's not that he slurs his words. You can understand individual words and phrases. It's that there's no clear train of thought behind his words and phrases, and that much of it is apropos of nothing. E.g., he spoke (again) about the electoral college and how he wasn't supposed to win the election. First, no-one asked him about that. Second, the election was 18 months ago ffs, there's more important things going on today.

Why does this bother you so much?

[wufwugy]

It's not that he slurs his words. You can understand individual words and phrases. It's that there's no clear train of thought behind his words and phrases, and that much of it is apropos of nothing. E.g., he spoke (again) about the electoral college and how he wasn't supposed to win the election. First, no-one asked him about that. Second, the election was 18 months ago ffs, there's more important things going on today

Can you understand his points in spite of how he phrases them?

[oskar]

Can you understand his points in spite of how he phrases them?

Maybe you could watch the Fox & Friends interview and write us a synopsis.

[Poopadoop]

Maybe you could watch the Fox & Friends interview and write us a synopsis.

Oh I can do that.

It was about 2 or 3 things that are relevant to anything, the rest just jabbering nonsense and/or repeating things he's said before.