03-18-2018 09:00 AM
#1801
| |
03-18-2018 09:06 AM
#1802
| |
| |
| |
03-18-2018 09:14 AM
#1803
| |
Perhaps the bias you're perceiving is due to your own bias the other way. | |
03-18-2018 09:23 AM
#1804
| |
No it's just "he has I'm guilty stamped all over him" perfectly demonstrates the inherent bias. This should be eivdent even to those who agree with you. | |
| |
03-18-2018 09:33 AM
#1805
| |
I disagree. If I come home to find the sofa chewed up and my dog greets my at the door by grovelling at my feet, I'd say 'he has guilty stamped all over him', and that's an accurate description of his behaviour. It doesn't mean he is guilty, just that he acts guilty. | |
03-18-2018 09:40 AM
#1806
| |
|
Stamped by CNN, lol |
03-18-2018 09:42 AM
#1807
| |
| |
03-18-2018 09:45 AM
#1808
| |
|
this is completely unsubstantiated, unproven, and without any degree of credible merit. It's completely made up. |
03-18-2018 10:36 AM
#1809
| |
There's questionable unproven evidence that Trump has done something. | |
| |
03-18-2018 10:46 AM
#1810
| |
| |
03-18-2018 11:02 AM
#1811
| |
| |
03-18-2018 11:06 AM
#1812
| |
James Comey on twitter: | |
03-18-2018 11:07 AM
#1813
| |
|
But clearly you don't. You just blue-pilled yourself into believing it because you don't like Trump. |
Last edited by BananaStand; 03-18-2018 at 11:12 AM. | |
03-18-2018 11:08 AM
#1814
| |
Trump's tweet which led to Comey's response | |
03-18-2018 11:10 AM
#1815
| |
| |
03-18-2018 11:10 AM
#1816
| |
Because no-one has alleged any. Because none of his campaign team had shady business dealings with Finland. Because no-one lied about talking to Finns. Because the president never conspired to make up a story about why they were talking to Finns. | |
03-18-2018 11:12 AM
#1817
| |
03-18-2018 11:13 AM
#1818
| |
| |
03-18-2018 11:18 AM
#1819
| |
03-18-2018 11:29 AM
#1820
| |
|
Shouldn't we first investigate the credibility of the person making the allegations. If they have an obvious reason to have a heavily biased perceptions of events....are their allegations credible?? |
03-18-2018 11:36 AM
#1821
| |
03-18-2018 11:36 AM
#1822
| |
Cute. I just said I don't "believe" them, I just think there's enough to warrant an investigation. You on the other hand have decided to believe without a doubt they're false, without any tangible proof. | |
| |
03-18-2018 11:37 AM
#1823
| |
03-18-2018 11:42 AM
#1824
| |
03-18-2018 11:43 AM
#1825
| |
|
That's just a legal magic trick. They can't get an obstruction charge without proving intent. And since intent can't be proven...that should be the end of the investigation. Instead, people like you have blue-pilled themselves to try and prove intent by showing that the Russia stuff is true. |
03-18-2018 11:46 AM
#1826
| |
03-18-2018 02:02 PM
#1827
| |
|
i didnt say you, i said people like you and that includes my congressperson |
03-18-2018 05:21 PM
#1828
| |
|
When Trump tweets about something he thinks has happened, it is likely that he already knows it happened. This has revealed several times in the past. Like when he tweeted about being illegal spied on by the Obama administration, he already knew he was because of his clearance. The media called him a stupid liar but then months later after reports were released by Congress that confirmed what Trump said, mum's the word. |
03-18-2018 05:35 PM
#1829
| |
|
Apparently just before Mueller was appointed, he was working for the same firm that represented Manafort. |
03-19-2018 04:33 PM
#1830
| |
|
I just watched AirForce one arrive for Trump's scheduled visit to NH. My office window is about 20 inches from the runway so I got a first hand view of the operation. |
03-20-2018 11:57 AM
#1831
| |
|
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/03/20...-confirms.html |
Last edited by BananaStand; 03-20-2018 at 01:53 PM. | |
03-20-2018 12:21 PM
#1832
| |
Since we have already established that it costs exactly zero dollarinos to put armed officers in every school, I don't see why not. The more shootings there are, the more officers you put in place. Thus solving the problem once and for all. You have made a great case and I must concede my point. I don't even know why we don't just gift guns to mentally unstable people since it will create jobs and cost zero lives. | |
| |
03-20-2018 12:31 PM
#1833
| |
I have no argument therefore allow me to be absurd. | |
| |
03-20-2018 01:25 PM
#1834
| |
Banana said exactly that. It costs literally no money, but also: Trump lives vicariously so there's infinite money for everything anyway. I'll just go with that. You want me to seriously argue against that? I feel more productive licking a window. | |
Last edited by oskar; 03-20-2018 at 01:49 PM.
| |
03-20-2018 01:51 PM
#1835
| |
| |
03-20-2018 01:52 PM
#1836
| |
If banana was arguing that training teachers will cost nothing, then that is indeed absurd. However, as I recall, he was talking about guards (even you said officers, not teachers), who already undergo training, therefore the additional cost of training guards should be zero because they should already be being trained to a high standard. What extra cost is there? The extra cost is the salary of the guard. | |
| |
03-20-2018 02:01 PM
#1837
| |
|
Even you have been deluded by the propaganda man. Fortunately though, you're not hopelessly lost like some others. |
03-20-2018 02:10 PM
#1838
| |
|
More details rolling in now. The shooter was indeed engaged by an armed officer. He did fire, and so did the shooter. Though it's not clear if the officer killed the shooter, or if the shooter killed himself. Either way, it was the engagement with the officer that ended the shooting and the shooter. |
03-20-2018 02:28 PM
#1839
| |
So let me break this down again: | |
Last edited by oskar; 03-20-2018 at 02:30 PM.
| |
03-20-2018 02:39 PM
#1840
| |
| |
| |
03-20-2018 02:54 PM
#1841
| |
Because it's the epitome of symptomatic problem solving. Europe has had school shootings. Not anymore. You just recently ran into one of the consequences. | |
| |
03-20-2018 02:55 PM
#1842
| |
| |
03-20-2018 03:02 PM
#1843
| |
You already answered this. Any nutjob can purchase a gun legally. | |
03-20-2018 03:04 PM
#1844
| |
|
Yes please, let's do that. |
03-20-2018 03:06 PM
#1845
| |
| |
03-20-2018 03:08 PM
#1846
| |
|
who decides who is a "nutjob" and who isn't? |
03-20-2018 03:18 PM
#1847
| |
03-20-2018 03:21 PM
#1848
| |
I'm not running in circles with you. I've already explained why these statistics aren't useful when wuf posted them. | |
Last edited by oskar; 03-20-2018 at 03:23 PM.
| |
03-20-2018 03:26 PM
#1849
| |
|
You mean, you have no defense of your incorrect, statistically disproved, claims. Gothcya |
03-20-2018 03:31 PM
#1850
| |
|
Who then? |
Last edited by BananaStand; 03-20-2018 at 03:33 PM. | |
03-20-2018 03:34 PM
#1851
| |
So, Ong. You understand why I didn't want to waste the effort. This is a lost cause. | |
| |
03-20-2018 03:38 PM
#1852
| |
|
You call it a "waste of effort" but what you're really saying is that you're incapable. |
03-20-2018 03:52 PM
#1853
| |
Some people think shouting "You're wrong you *!(&!*!" over and over till you get sick of it and leave means they won the 'argument'. | |
03-20-2018 03:55 PM
#1854
| |
| |
03-20-2018 05:33 PM
#1855
| |
| |
03-20-2018 05:39 PM
#1856
| |
Yes. Gun control is too contentious an issue in USA and any effort to curb the widespread ownership of guns will simply cause friction between political opponents while ensuring the bad guy to good guy ratio is shifting ever more in favour of the bad guy. | |
| |
03-20-2018 05:40 PM
#1857
| |
And why should that not be changed for people with severe mental disorders or people who have made terroristic threats? The TSC can put people on no-fly lists for way less. That's arguably a bigger encroachment on a persons freedom than their right to purchase a firearm. | |
| |
03-20-2018 05:43 PM
#1858
| |
I agree with oskar on that point. | |
| |
03-20-2018 05:47 PM
#1859
| |
| |
03-20-2018 05:54 PM
#1860
| |
|
Which mental disorders...specifically? |
03-20-2018 05:54 PM
#1861
| |
| |
03-20-2018 05:56 PM
#1862
| |
| |
| |
03-20-2018 05:58 PM
#1863
| |
| |
| |
03-20-2018 05:59 PM
#1864
| |
| |
03-20-2018 06:01 PM
#1865
| |
It's not very specific tho, is it? There's nothing in the constitution that the 2nd amendment does not apply to convicted criminals. Neither does it specify the types of arms a well regulated militia might bear. Why not fully automatic weapons? Explosives? Bio-chemical weapons? Anti personnel mines? Why should you not be allowed to own an anti-personnel mine as a convicted felon when that right is clearly codified into law. | |
| |
03-20-2018 06:04 PM
#1866
| |
| |
03-20-2018 06:06 PM
#1867
| |
Ok perhaps a better question to ask is... | |
| |
03-20-2018 06:08 PM
#1868
| |
| |
03-20-2018 06:09 PM
#1869
| |
|
It sounds like you're saying that bad laws are an excuse for more bad laws. |
03-20-2018 06:10 PM
#1870
| |
03-20-2018 06:10 PM
#1871
| |
|
It's already been demonstrated that process is broken in a way that is very much corrupt. |
03-20-2018 06:12 PM
#1872
| |
| |
| |
03-20-2018 06:12 PM
#1873
| |
| |
03-20-2018 06:13 PM
#1874
| |
| |
03-20-2018 06:14 PM
#1875
| |
| |