01-14-2018 05:54 PM
#901
| |
| |
01-14-2018 05:57 PM
#902
| |
Do you mean 'context cues'? Why yes they do. That's why I pointed out it would be strange to say "I would..." and then not qualify it. | |
01-14-2018 06:03 PM
#903
| |
01-14-2018 06:12 PM
#904
| |
| |
01-14-2018 06:13 PM
#905
| |
The mainstream media in the United States regularly makes up complete and utter bullshit for their stories. It's because of the advertising model they use and the fact that there's nothing holding them accountable. So yes, I do not put it past them to suggest he was talking about A when he was obviously talking about B. | |
| |
01-14-2018 06:24 PM
#906
| |
|
Stephen Miller: Let me tell you the truth about Trump that I see. |
01-14-2018 06:33 PM
#907
| |
| |
| |
01-14-2018 06:43 PM
#908
| |
01-14-2018 06:44 PM
#909
| |
01-14-2018 06:49 PM
#910
| |
In case you skipped over it, when you search for context cues, the first result is context clues. | |
Last edited by spoonitnow; 01-14-2018 at 06:56 PM. | |
01-14-2018 06:51 PM
#911
| |
01-14-2018 06:57 PM
#912
| |
At some point as a mod and all, I think I'm supposed to suggest people not call each other insulting names or issue warnings or some shit like that. | |
| |
01-14-2018 07:03 PM
#913
| |
Sounds like something a cuck would do. Not that I'm calling you that. | |
01-14-2018 07:07 PM
#914
| |
The Associated Press Stylebook gives context clues. | |
| |
01-14-2018 07:21 PM
#915
| |
Just admit that you heard it somewhere and ran with it and leave it at that. | |
01-14-2018 07:45 PM
#916
| |
| |
01-14-2018 07:52 PM
#917
| |
|
The reason O'Reilly would do that? To boast himself with "I'm always fair" or whatever I've seen him do before. Regardless, it might be case that a person telling something O'Reilly disagrees with might have gotten more voice than Tapper gives to somebody he disagrees with. |
01-14-2018 08:03 PM
#918
| |
I haven't watched enough of Tapper to form a solid opinion, but he was a bit dickish in that interview with Mueller I agree. O'Reilly (again my relatively inexperienced judgement) was a counter-puncher and wanted to hear your side so he could attack it. Tucker whatshisface (again not a big watcher) seems to be more like Tapper in that he'll cut you off and badger you. Other interviewers just nod politely at everything. So they all have their own style I guess. | |
01-14-2018 08:11 PM
#919
| |
Last edited by spoonitnow; 01-14-2018 at 08:22 PM. | |
01-14-2018 08:28 PM
#920
| |
|
On "I" vs. "I'd", sounds like "I" to me. |
01-14-2018 08:34 PM
#921
| |
01-14-2018 09:05 PM
#922
| |
Scholars don't use google for research. Students and laypeople do. | |
01-14-2018 09:10 PM
#923
| |
This shows a complete lack of understanding of how Google Scholar works or what its purpose is. | |
Last edited by spoonitnow; 01-14-2018 at 09:13 PM. | |
01-14-2018 09:12 PM
#924
| |
| |
01-14-2018 09:16 PM
#925
| |
| |
01-14-2018 09:18 PM
#926
| |
| |
| |
01-14-2018 09:21 PM
#927
| |
I wouldn't know cause i don't use it. And the only people I do know who use it are people who don't know any better. | |
01-14-2018 09:52 PM
#928
| |
Back to our regularly scheduled MAGA: | |
| |
01-14-2018 09:55 PM
#929
| |
|
hotties for trump you say |
Last edited by spoonitnow; 01-14-2018 at 09:57 PM. Reason: Spoiler tags to keep it nsfw | |
01-14-2018 09:58 PM
#930
| |
I threw in a spoiler tag since the thread isn't posted as NSFW just to make sure that the non-liberals (aka people who work) don't lose their jobs over some fine, white ass. | |
| |
01-14-2018 10:02 PM
#931
| |
|
omg i just said "speaking of hotties for trump" after you posted pic of his hot daughter (that he totally wants to bang). omg the freud. |
01-14-2018 10:03 PM
#932
| |
| |
Last edited by wufwugy; 01-14-2018 at 10:24 PM. | |
01-14-2018 10:03 PM
#933
| |
Last edited by spoonitnow; 01-14-2018 at 10:06 PM. | |
01-14-2018 10:18 PM
#934
| |
|
|
01-14-2018 10:25 PM
#935
| |
I'm not playing when I say she's my favorite first daughter. | |
| |
01-14-2018 10:42 PM
#936
| |
|
i wonder if trump ever calls melania "ivania" on accident (during secks ofc) becuase he's thinking of his dawghter. |
01-14-2018 10:54 PM
#937
| |
| |
01-14-2018 11:09 PM
#938
| |
|
are his daughters porn stars? otherwise, fake news |
01-14-2018 11:21 PM
#939
| |
|
I'm looking forward to the Lifetime drama "Kushner and Kim." A radioactive romp where Jared confesses of his napalmic love to a power-hungry dictator with a heart of uranium one. |
01-15-2018 01:23 AM
#940
| |
"MLK's Niece: 'Outrageous' That Critics Are 'Unjustly' Calling Trump Racist" | |
| |
01-15-2018 01:24 AM
#941
| |
kek <--- this one | |
| |
01-15-2018 01:57 AM
#942
| |
Michael Wolff Source: He Printed A Third-Hand Story I Told Him That I Got From Someone On A Beach | |
| |
01-15-2018 12:40 PM
#943
| |
|
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...n-address.html |
01-15-2018 12:42 PM
#944
| |
|
Sheilas and blokes, we have a new GOAT |
01-15-2018 12:43 PM
#945
| |
| |
01-15-2018 03:28 PM
#946
| |
| |
01-15-2018 03:42 PM
#947
| |
| |
| |
01-16-2018 12:52 PM
#948
| |
|
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/01/16...sex-abuse.html |
01-16-2018 01:14 PM
#949
| |
| |
01-16-2018 01:22 PM
#950
| |
| |
01-16-2018 02:55 PM
#951
| |
01-16-2018 03:46 PM
#952
| |
| |
01-16-2018 04:53 PM
#953
| |
|
The results of Trump's physical are in... |
01-16-2018 05:26 PM
#954
| |
|
Antagonists thinking you are insane when you are actually sane is a powerful position to be in. |
01-16-2018 05:28 PM
#955
| |
| |
01-16-2018 05:51 PM
#956
| |
| |
| |
01-16-2018 06:02 PM
#957
| |
San Francisco is a confirmed shithole. | |
| |
01-16-2018 06:28 PM
#958
| |
|
Now that's smart |
01-17-2018 10:04 AM
#959
| |
|
I'm gonna do a Trump impression here and parrot what I just saw on Fox & Friends. |
01-17-2018 10:35 AM
#960
| |
I'm of the opinion that the above is common sense, and it completely boggles my mind how many people cannot see that. | |
Last edited by spoonitnow; 01-17-2018 at 10:39 AM. | |
01-17-2018 11:20 AM
#961
| |
What's your endgame, spoon? I mean... assuming all production can be automated at some point, and that no manual labor will be needed in any industry, only skilled labor. | |
01-17-2018 11:21 AM
#962
| |
Even if you abolish minimum wages, it's not going to fix the underlying problem. People are just not going to work for the wages you'd have to settle for if you want to compete with a touch screen at McDonalds or a self driving truck, because that wouldn't be $11 an hour. Try a week. | |
| |
01-17-2018 11:45 AM
#963
| |
|
You've just touched on why all the paranoia about greedy corporations is overblown. |
01-17-2018 11:49 AM
#964
| |
|
My name's not spoon, but I'm chiming in anyway. Short answer: there is no endgame. |
01-17-2018 12:52 PM
#965
| |
01-17-2018 12:55 PM
#966
| |
Automation has always happened but never at the scale it's happening at today. You can't try to look at the past when you are going to have machines that will be capable of doing virtually every single job humans are doing today. And that's not just driving, warehouse work and miscellaneous manual labor. Stock traders are being replaced by machines. Surgeons are already largely working with robotics. One highly specialized surgeon can do the job of 10 surgeons by working around the globe through a screen. It probably won't be that long until you can replace that one guy with a machine. It's not like there will be less jobs. There will be no jobs. And that should be a great thing! But I don't see how it's going to work without some type of redistribution system like universal income. | |
| |
01-17-2018 12:59 PM
#967
| |
|
If that was to happen, it would mean that humans no longer have a comparative advantage over machines. In that case, it may be that jobs are the last thing we should worry about since it would likely mean AI would be more advanced than humans. Your premise would also mean that humans aren't consuming. |
01-17-2018 12:59 PM
#968
| |
| |
01-17-2018 01:05 PM
#969
| |
|
I can tell you're thinking about this. |
01-17-2018 01:12 PM
#970
| |
| |
01-17-2018 01:17 PM
#971
| |
| |
01-17-2018 01:19 PM
#972
| |
01-17-2018 01:22 PM
#973
| |
| |
01-17-2018 01:26 PM
#974
| |
AI is more advanced than humans in many sectors. It is much worse than humans in many others. But that really doesn't matter. When I say AI or automation, I don't talk about a general AI, I just mean the level of AI necessary to do certain specialized tasks. | |
| |
01-17-2018 01:28 PM
#975
| |
|
I should rephrase this. A comparative advantage is something you have with yourself. It's where you are better at one activity than you are another activity. Comparative advantages relate to each other. That's why countries trade. Even if one country can make more of two different goods than another country, they each specialize in their comparative advantages and end up with more total resources by doing so. |