|
|
 Originally Posted by boost
But this is not amorality, this is a-universal-morality, no? Insisting it is amorality forces us to throw up our hands, while taking the stance that there is no universal morality, or that it is unknowable (certainly by way of their book), allows us to explore the issue further. Claiming amorality just seems lazy here.
I'm not sure what you're asking
I don't think I was trying to use amorality as an explanation. It's my response to the anti-abortion movement that believes, without any concrete reasons, that there is universal morality (God's morality) and this means that they can be and are right about abortion. I don't know what else to say to that mentality other than to point out how god isn't real, the universe doesn't care, and they're simply just imposing their ideals onto others even when it hurts people
It was a side comment too. Nobody here made this anti-abortion case. Also I guess I thought surviva's claim that amorality doesn't exist is strange, so we went further into it
|