|
|
 Originally Posted by ensign_lee
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
Originally Posted by ensign_lee
and actually, it'd be more like 17 years ago...(9 months pregnancy...HELLO? :P)
That's assuming he's exactly 16 and not 16 and 6 months or 16 and 9 months.
Check and mate. :P
-'rilla
ah, but the majority of the time (75%), it WILL have been 17 years instead of 16. I am going on the majority, as it gives me the positive expected value to be right. neeeneer neeener neener. :P
If he's 16 and 6 months and older, You should round it to 16 years ago for reasons of brevity. If it's younger, then you should round it up to 17. So it's 50/50 for reasons of ball parking.
And my 16 comment leaves less confusion about his actualy age vrs your 17 since it requires the explination of accounting for pregnancy.
I win. :P
-'rilla
|
Reply With Quote