|
all i can say on the media narrative around carson is that it has been wrong every step of the way and is likely to be wrong about its predictions now.
for example, even now as several in the conservative media are beginning to see that carson does have some presidential abilities with things like strong campaign organizational skills, they're still saying "yeah but this other thing over here, he's bad at that. ignore the fact that we have been continually wrong about carson and are continually having to say so".
now they're saying that the real problem of carson is that he doesn't have policy depth and he'll get eaten alive in the debates when they get smaller. the irony is that what the media thinks is policy depth actually isn't policy depth. soundbites and explaining things in establishment-speak is not policy depth. i wouldnt be surprised if carson has even more real policy depth than anybody on the stage. one way of seeing this is that the way he talks about issues shows that his beliefs are rooted in philosophical understanding. contrast this to rubio, who's all over the place philosophically. rubio sounds like a well-oiled machine on policy, but his real understanding of it is likely less than appearances. of course this harkens back to the fact that many in the media themselves are philosophically inconsistent on policy, so they don't know what policy depth looks like.
carson may not do well with establishment-speak, but he kills it in conservative-speak. it's a unique talent that you will almost never hear the media point out (ive seen it only once). to those who understand conservative-speak, carson's rise was never a surprise.
carson's humility and demeanor are such an incredible strength that they could propel him to an actual, true landslide where where he wins everything the gop wins as well as michigan, pennsylvania, wisconsin, and minnesota. all the while the media will be baffled that this happened. they'll have forgotten that the media is culturally new yorkian and coastal californian, and the rest of the country doesn't think the way they do. carson is the type of candidate who can bring the silent majority back. a large majority of voters find great virtue in a man who walks the walk even if he can't talk the talk. but carson does talk the talk. he just doesn't bluster, so the media thinks he's no good.
TLDR: the media says hillary would crush carson in the debates. what would really happen is her team would come away high-fiving each other at how brilliant and dominant she was, but then two days later their jaws would hit floor when the polls came back showing that people are not impressed by an elitist's snazzy rhetorical attempts to undress a man of great accomplishment and even greater humility.
|