|
Originally Posted by pocketfours
Reality check.
The main reason for buying an SLR is that you get to use different lenses, filters and external flashes etc. If you aren't going to get into that (like most people who buy an SLR), then what you have is a very bulky and expensive point and shoot.
With a kit zoom lens the quality isn't significantly better than what you get with a good point and shoot. Prime lenses is the way to go anyway imo.
Yes, the best point-and-shoots nowadays have very equal quality to most DSLRs, the main differences are speed (shooting anything that moves) and the ability to change lenses for different purposes. The Nikon kit lenses such as the 18-55 VR are excellent for 80% of anyone's outdoor shots, portraits, closeups, etc. and will produce professional quality photos. The lens is useless indoors though, and the 35mm f/1.8 is for that, and even better for portraits etc. If you need a telephoto for shooting sports or birds or your neighbor in the shower, go for it, but pretty much everything else can be covered with the 2 lenses I mentioned. At least for me, the point of a DSLR is to have a versatile camera that can do anything, not to lug around dozens of lenses just because I can. If the kit lens does a great job I see no reason to not use it out of some principle. The OP asked for a package of $600 to start photography with, a single "prime lens" easily costs that alone.
|