01-08-2010 10:08 PM
#1
| |
| |
01-08-2010 10:18 PM
#2
| |
|
Move up to where people respect your raises. |
01-08-2010 10:29 PM
#3
| |
|
But then that means I haven't actually beaten 2NL, which is the aim. |
| |
01-08-2010 11:57 PM
#4
| |
For she smaller ones (88,99) it really depends on the table situation and your position. For TT+, I would be hard pressed to think of a case where I would not raise (unless you start trying to trap with your big hands). | |
| |
01-09-2010 01:46 AM
#5
| |
| |
| |
01-09-2010 02:23 AM
#6
| |
No no no. Not SYS-TEM. RAN-GES. | |
01-09-2010 02:34 AM
#7
| |
|
Noted. |
| |
01-09-2010 04:52 AM
#8
| |
|
Depends on a whole bunch of things. At 2nl with anything under TT i would just call in ep and raise limpers in LP. If it's raised before it gets to me then i have a few things to think about. |
01-09-2010 07:11 AM
#9
| |
| |
| |
01-09-2010 07:35 AM
#10
| |
|
|
01-09-2010 10:01 AM
#11
| |
I find that cbets are typically more effective against tighter players who limp pf from EP. | |
| |
01-09-2010 10:20 AM
#12
| |
| |
01-09-2010 11:55 AM
#13
| |
|
|
01-09-2010 12:27 PM
#14
| |
01-09-2010 12:32 PM
#15
| |
| |
01-09-2010 12:57 PM
#16
| |
01-09-2010 01:03 PM
#17
| |
Re: playing pocket pairs 88+
| |
01-09-2010 01:16 PM
#18
| |
parasurama pwned me. i was all like, i cant find a good way to say it so ill try to get the other guys to do it...and then para just swoops in and is like BAM MOTHA FUCKA. | |
01-09-2010 01:16 PM
#19
| |
| |
01-09-2010 01:23 PM
#20
| |
| |
| |
01-09-2010 01:35 PM
#21
| |
jesus you're playing 10bb stacks at 2NL? This accomplishes nothing. You're not making money, you're not learning how to make money, you're probably not even going to learn a good shortstacking strategy. | |
01-09-2010 09:04 PM
#22
| |
| |
01-09-2010 09:13 PM
#23
| |
bb = big blinds not buy ins, just a heads up. | |
01-09-2010 09:15 PM
#24
| |
|
I know that. |
01-09-2010 09:19 PM
#25
| |
then yes, its pretty obvious u should be shoving 88 and lol at ever limping anything ever with 10bbs | |
01-09-2010 09:53 PM
#26
| |
Serious breakdown of communication going on here | |
| |
01-09-2010 10:28 PM
#27
| |
|
|
01-09-2010 11:05 PM
#28
| |
| |
01-09-2010 11:11 PM
#29
| |
Easy, it arose from your incorrect use of "bb" instead of "bi". I'm sure you knew what you meant, but from an outside point of view it can seem a little unclear. To clarify... | |
| |
01-09-2010 11:16 PM
#30
| |
|
|
01-09-2010 11:18 PM
#31
| |
| |
| |
01-09-2010 11:24 PM
#32
| |
| |
01-09-2010 11:25 PM
#33
| |
hahaha I apologize. You said you were playing with 10bb, which led me to believe you were playing shortstacked (buying in for 20 cents at 2NL) but actually you're playing deepstacked (250bb). I would suggest buying in for only 100bb, especially since you only have 10 buy-ins, or perhaps 9 now. What's your sn? I'll ship you $4 if you want, pm if you don't want it public. | |
01-09-2010 11:28 PM
#34
| |
|
Nah it's ok, but thanks so much. |
| |
01-09-2010 11:43 PM
#35
| |
OP is extremely results oriented. this is not how you win at poker. | |
01-09-2010 11:46 PM
#36
| |
|
|
01-09-2010 11:48 PM
#37
| |
Dont listen to anything i say, because i have no idea what you're talking about. Idk, maybe we're not on the same wavelength but it seems you and i just dont know what the other is saying. My mistake. | |
01-09-2010 11:49 PM
#38
| |
OP might be less results oriented if each win/loss didn't result in a huge gain/loss in his bankroll | |
| |
01-09-2010 11:52 PM
#39
| |
|
|
01-09-2010 11:59 PM
#40
| |
|
|
01-10-2010 12:32 AM
#41
| |
|
Easy , Have you watched ant of the videos on this site? |
01-10-2010 12:37 AM
#42
| |
|
|
01-10-2010 01:16 AM
#43
| |
| |
01-10-2010 12:01 PM
#44
| |
Did I read right? OP is a 2nl shortstacker and limps JJ? | |
01-10-2010 12:19 PM
#45
| |
| |
01-10-2010 12:23 PM
#46
| |
| |
01-10-2010 12:24 PM
#47
| |
| |
| |
01-10-2010 12:28 PM
#48
| |
| |
01-10-2010 12:35 PM
#49
| |
|
Ok, thanks very much. |
| |