Guys,
don´t bother "balancing" your ranges anywhere below 200NL and even there you should only do it vs a person who can read your hand (those are few!)
The idea of balancing simply means to have a
range made up of different kinds of hands, for the sake of being less "readable" and to gain from a game-theory pov (if u haven´t yet, read
this)
This whole balancing thing plays on the second
level, so as long the
villain is only concerned about his cards and which
button to click on, you´ll actually
own urself. Also note, that it´s all about, what the
villain perceives to be your
range, so u could
flip it upside down and
exploit a
villain who perceives u to be balanced by being not.
For example, I 3bet a 20/16 CO´s
open in position. On
level one, I´d 3bet all those hands, which happen to have 50%
equity+ vs his
range when called. "Balancing" would mean, that I add hands like A4s or 56s to that
range, which
don´t play particularly
well vs his continuing
range, but are part of a
range which is perceived to be at least moderately strong and can gain a profit from folding
equity. After 1k hands vs me he looks at his
HUD and thinks "OMG hes 3ballin me 10%
in position, thats not that strong a
range" and has to adjust his former
call 3bet/4ball ranges. Until he properly adjusts, we gained a lot from the mistakes he made, due to us being balanced, ie not calling a hand like KQs or AQo, not 4balling
JJ or whatever it may be.
"Merging" a
range refers to having ur
range made up of hands, that are located on a steady interval over ur pot
equity (??) {88+,KQo, KJs+, AQ, AK} would be a merged
range to say 3bet from the blinds, opposed to a "polarized"
range, which looks like {
QQ+, AK, 22-44, A2s-A5s}.
We merge our
range, to have more hands for value, we polarize a
range to gain folding
equity on the weak part and stimulate
action for the stronger ones in that
range.