hand 1) your bet sizing sucks. it sucks even more in the
light of hand #3, where the board is practically the same, but you have a better hand. do you always choose to bet smaller when you have better hands? hand 1 is an easy 1/2 pot bet for a couple reasons - 1) in this
case, youre bluffing with your muffin, so itll save you the largest amount of money when your opp hits. 2) it represents a really big hand. its like shouting to your opponent that you want first and foremost to keep them in a growing pot. the cool thing is that you can easily
balance this with your total bluffs, and make $$$. keep in mind that there are just so many different hands that hit this
flop, that you can generally just 1/2 pot the
flop, and then re-evaluate on the
turn, where you should generally valuehouse, because when you make bigger bets on the
turn with your nut-type hands, your opp will be making a much bigger mistake by calling
hand 2) csb.
hand 3) bet sizing sucks again, and you have spewy postflop leaks. it would be really helpful here if you had any
reads at all on opp besides his
stats. against a station, id say go closer to pot size bet on this
flop, because there are just so many hands that will pay you off. did i ever mention that
notes on opp would be great here? he c/cs the
flop oop. what kind of
range do you put him on here?
Turn play is awful. you get minraised on a dangerous
flop, and you decide to put your
stack in. oh, my bad, you didnt just get minraised, you got CHECKminraised.
after seeing these hands, my
notes on your opp say "slowplays/minr nutty hands,
passive station with mid holdings"
my
notes on you say "inverse strong weak bet sizing
tell, plays hyperagg to weak
aggression"
but if you REALLY want to get good at poker, you need to fix your biggest
leak in this
post, namely "but it appears
2b broken" thats gonna end up costing you a lot.