David Sklansky's Tournament Poker For Advanced Players
Inside Sklansky's Tournament Poker For Advanced Players
David Sklansky explains Expected Value early in this book.
Sklansky uses a coin flip as an example, "if someone stupidly offered you $300 for $200 on a flip of a coin,
you have an expected value of positive $50." 
A key concept with tournaments is that it may not always be right to make the play with higher
expected value, "it turns out that in a tournament it is not always right to choose the play with the slightly higher EV.
This is because the higher EV bet may be more likely to lose." 
From a tournament perspective, it is more important to stay alive.
Slow-playing in tournaments can be dangerous,
"Unless you have a 'monster' hand, slowplaying, while often making you more when it works,
entails an extra risk of losing the pot. This risk is often worth taking in a regular game,
but not in a tournament." 
Sklansky also discuess 'The Gap Concept' early in the book -
"There is a very important general principle understood by all good poker players.
That is, you need a better hand to play against someone who has already opened the
betting than you would need to open yourself." 
The size of the gap depends on how your opponents are playing,
"If your opponents are quite loose, there may be no gap at all." [27-28]
The gap concept is consistent with tournament strategy,
"You avoid confrontations with those who have already shown strength, and you take advantage of those
who are trying to preserve their chips." 
The author clarifies that the gap concept does not apply when someone just limps in ahead of you
instead of raising before you act. He goes on to say that limping is generally not a good idea in tournaments,
"In general, you should rarely limp in in a limit hold'em tournament.
There is simply too great a chance that you will steal the blinds with a raise." 
Strategies change with chip counts, "I have often heard it said that, if your stack is short,
you must take chances now because you will not have enough chips to play with once the stakes go up.
That is totally wrong. In fact, if anything, the reverse is true." 
All-in situations are frequent in tournaments and the author runs through some scenarios.
"Suppose you are playing limit hold'em and are in the big blind, and all you have left is
just enough to call a raise. All fold to the small blind, who raises without looking at his cards.
You have 32. Should you call? Yes because a trey-deuce has a 32 percent chance of beating two random cards,
and you are getting 3-to-1 on this call." The footnote explains that "trey-deuce is the
worst possible hand played against two random cards 'hot and cold', i.e. no betting." 
The author makes it clear that one should not raise in no limit hold'em unless the reaction from a reraise is obvious, "So again, do not raise in no limit hold'em, especially tournaments, if there is a reasonable chance that a reraise will make you throw up." 
AK is a solid hand in no-limit hold'em and it is often best played by moving all in, "moving in before the flop with ace-king is often the best way to play that hand. It is important to understand, however, that it is a lot better to be the bettor when you put your money in, rather than calling someone else's all-in bet." 
The author has a system for beginner no limit tournament players. He taught it to a female player as follows:
1. If someone else has raised in front of you, move in all your chips with aces, kings, or ace-king suited. Otherwise fold.
2. If not one else has raised in front of you, move in all your chips with any pair, any ace-other suited, ace-king(suited or offsuit), or two suited connected cards, except for four-trey or trey-deuce. 
He goes on to elaborate, "Notice that the hands that she was to move in with(again, when no one raised in front of her) comprised about 13 percent of all the two card cominations.(If you don't know how I got that, stop reading this book right now. You are not ready for it. You don't know enough about poker. And, you deserve to lose.)" 
David Sklansky's Tournament Poker For Advanced Players Reviews
to post your thoughts and review David Sklansky's Tournament Poker For Advanced Players!
Please use your registered FTR Poker Forum handle
when posting your review.
You may click here to register.
| “Sklansky's Advanced Tournament Review” by drhoenikker, 18 Jan 2005
Limit: No Limit: Tournament: Other Highlights: Overall Rating:
The ambiguity in the name of this book
is something that confuses a lot of
people, including some reviewers. The
target audience of this book is ADVANCED
poker players who have NOT played much
in tournaments. Experienced tournament
players might get something out of it
too, or use it as reference, but they
are NOT who the author had in mind. So,
if you are looking for advanced
tournament tips, skip this one, save
some money and aggravation, and drop me
a "thank you" note. :-)
This said, the book accomplishes what it
is set to do rather well. There is a
large number of very solid poker players
who almost never play in tournaments
simply because the price of learning
tournament basics through first-hand
experience is rather high. On the other
hand, explaining tournament basics to an
advanced player is easy, or at least
Sklansky makes it seem this way. If you
are a good player thinking of playing
tournaments, read this book -- it has
answers to most of your questions.
Have you ever come across a confusing poker term? Our poker dictionary has 1224 definitions!
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Would you like to submit your own poker article to be featured on FTR? You can by clicking here - Submit a Poker Article!