Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,291,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

100NL: Over-ambitious blind defense?

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1

    Default 100NL: Over-ambitious blind defense?

    Weak read of "positionally aware tagg with high steal%"

    I should probably only do this preflop with a better read, eh?

    PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

    Hero ($97.50)
    BB ($132.35)
    UTG ($97.50)
    MP ($83.30)
    CO ($54.10)
    Button ($101)

    Preflop: Hero is SB with K, Q.
    3 folds, Button raises to $4, Hero raises to $12, 1 fold, Button calls $8.

    Flop: ($25) 7, 3, 8 (2 players)
    Hero bets $18, Button calls $18.

    Turn: ($61) K (2 players)
    Hero..... crai?
  2. #2
    Fnord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    19,388
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    We could talk about pre-flop, but meh.

    Yeah, check/bomb the turn.
  3. #3
    Preflop is fine/standard unless you have a read that he folds way too often to 3-bets in which case calling might be better. Most people who steal too much are also too ambitious defending against 3-bets. This is a great hand to 3-bet him with because he'll probably 4-bet the stuff that has you dominated and call with some stuff you dominate and then you can stack him when you both make top pair.

    As played I'd just jam. This is a spot where you want to make him hate life if he has TT/JJ (which NEVER bet the turn if you check). Checking is only better if you think he's floating super often with gutshots and stuff.
  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by mcatdog
    As played I'd just jam.
    Agree. I'm amazed by what looks me up when I shove here (at least at higher stakes).
  5. #5
    I wish I'd started a poll now...
  6. #6
    pankfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    854
    Location
    On Tony Romo's nuts
    I don't see many hands you dominate calling you except QJ suited sometimes. Just calling keeps in all K's and Q's you have dominated. I think you are chasing a ton of value out of the hand when you 3 bet.
    <Staxalax> I want everyone to put my quote in their sigs
  7. #7
    pankfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    854
    Location
    On Tony Romo's nuts
    Quote Originally Posted by mcatdog
    As played I'd just jam. This is a spot where you want to make him hate life if he has TT/JJ (which NEVER bet the turn if you check). Checking is only better if you think he's floating super often with gutshots and stuff.
    Do you think that shoving here has the most value vs TT/JJ? Shouldn't there be more value in betting river if he checks behind, bombing if he bets? I don't understand why we are interested in making life difficult for marginal hands that we beat.
    <Staxalax> I want everyone to put my quote in their sigs

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •